Yes,good thinking,already contemplated by wolfdog.
Robert Mazur
11:57 PM (12 hours ago)
to sales
Hi Henry,
The Band width was running out on original email!
I thought of another important question!
Will the NEWLY PLANNED NEXT GENERATION CHARGER Terminate at 2.8v? Or 3.1v like the BT-C3400 that “rdana” has?
I prefer 2.8v because it will give more accurate capacity results according to HKJ our Battery/Charger Guru.
Thank you,Robert
sales@opus-instrument.com
2:34 AM (9 hours ago)
to me
Hi, Robert
we are flexible. But for different people, their persfective is not same:
For those with not protected, discharge until 2.8v is fine. But for those with protected batteries, discharge to 2.8v will trigger a depletion protection.
So what I am thinking is that we should make it as ” with discharge loading, the battery should be discharged until 2.7v”. this might be able to satisfy both types of batteries.
How do you think?
regards
henry
_
Robert Mazur <capolini1226@gmail.com>
8:57 AM (3 hours ago)
to sales
Hi Henry,
I am not sure exactly what you mean? I may have misinterpreted it.
If you are concerned that protected batteries trip at 2.8v then why would you make the cutoff at 2.7v?
In 3 months I have discharged around 300 protected batteries on my Three Opus BT-C3100 2.2. Only One [1] battery tripped.That has never been an issue for me.
The issues for me that were already discussed were:
1.STOPPAGES due to inadequate fan [batteries too hot/sensor activated] resulting in inaccurate capacity tests. Hopefully resolved w/ my Delta fan 12v/0.12a/1.44w.
2.RESET-Due to inadequate SMPS[Power Supply].Resolved w/ TOP TIER Lite-On 12V/5.5A/66W SMPS
Like you said, we All have our preferences. 2.8V is fine with me. IF you were to change it, then 2.7v would certainly be my choice over 3.1v[3400 V3.1]
Thanks,Robert
See u in a day or two when “More will be revealed”