Oh, I don’t know of a video specific to this light, but the concept is the same. Do you already know where the sense resistors are on the UT02 driver? If not, I can hunt for a picture for you. [EDIT: Look at post 131 in this thread for the location.]
2:15 to 3:00
General videos
I recommend a tiny drop of super glue to hold the resistor on top or use a hemostat, if you have one, to hold it still. It likes to move around on you. Lol
I like the technique in those general videos. I might need some magnifying goggles to better see the tiny parts, though.
So does the 50% step-down, mean after 90s it’s output is limited to 325lm(650lm/2) ?
Is there anyway to lower the bleeder resistor and increase output?
Despite the issues, it’s still difficult to find a thrower at $30 that has a built in charger.
I agree 325lm is pretty bad for a XHP35, it has all the right stuff going for it why didn’t they just improve the driver.
Which Convoy C8 are you comparing to, XPL with 8 drivers? Or XPL with a FET?
How then me and Dale got 950 lumens for NW, and 1090 on CW? Not that I am discrediting yor measurements, but we had same Amperage on tail as you do 2,4- 2,5A and 0,7A on led
….
I use mine on 10 minute walks pretty much weekly, taking the trash down to the road for collection in the morning. It makes nice light and doesn’t step down like what you’re saying yours does. I tested it side by side with a Manker U21 and liked the UT02 better.
Just pulled mine off the shelf, well rested, and it does 1070.2 lumens for 2 minutes then takes 30 seconds to ramp down to 745.2 lumens where it sits stable for over a minute and I cut it off, the head is warm to the touch.
There is a step down after 3 min but from 950 to 640 lumens with my NW but you can’t actually see it with bare eyes. Anyway if you dont like it just go to secret mode and switch to turbo and it will stay in turbo until battery can handle it, also it will get hot after 10 minutes
When Peter and I pm'ed, I forgot the standard tail amps on these things is 2.3-2.5A amps now. Used to be over 5A when they did a true 1,300 lumens, like the Manker U21 did in my review: https://budgetlightforum.com/t/-/40242.
So the new 2.4A version does about 1,000 lumens. With Peter's doing ~650 lumens, I'd suspect the LED, LED mount, and/or optics, but could still be a driver problem I suppose.
He's right though - they downgraded the light but never downgraded the specs, but if the measurements are good, his is performing below par of even the downgraded model, but the amps drawn from the cell is not producing the same output.
“Just pulled mine off the shelf, well rested, and it does 1070.2 lumens for 2 minutes then takes 30 seconds to ramp down to 745.2 lumens where it sits stable for over a minute and I cut it off, the head is warm to the touch.”
I may not be a mathematical genius but even I can garner that 1070 well rested lumens is much more than half of 1300 ANSI rated lumens. The well rested cell in question is an OLD Moli 26700 sitting at 4.02V.
Edit: For the record, my UT02 with a Sanyo 20700B cell at 4.15V makes 1107.45 lumens. As tested moments ago before plugging the light in for charging.
Edit II: With the 20700B cell charged in the light, it makes 1111 lumens.
FWIW, without the lens mine is making 1159.2 lumens, so there is some 48 lumens blocked via the lens… which actually speaks very well for the lens of choice they put in this one!
Confused now, sure thought it was the UT02 that had a 3A built in charger… now I can’t find if there’s one I have that does or if I just got it wrong. Thanks Giorgo.
But of course, with most USB outlets having a 2A max. Seems there was a light that had more than one USB charging port that could be used simultaneously to charge faster although that’s not where I got the 3A figure, must’ve just made that one up. Sick and tired of being sick and tired…