Q8, PMS SEND TO THOSE WITH ISSUES BLF soda can light

Thank you @DB Custom for the easy to understand explanation :smiley:

I think it all boils down to this: Do we want to wait another 1-3 months to get such a board made, tested, and approved (or rejected and redesigned, re-tested, and approved) or do we just go forward now, knowing that somebody will develop a board for other emitter footprints soon enough once the light gets produced? Somebody will surely make such boards given the hearty interest which a few folks have exhibited over them :wink:

And I’m sensing something else here too. It seems that TF and the Q8 team are somewhat weary after all the effort which has been expended, which has been a huge effort and time commitment on numerous people’s parts. It’s been a long race and the finish line is in sight; let’s not move it further away now . Let everyone wrap up the last detail or two and take a well-deserved break while TF kicks it into their production schedule.

Everybody here is a winner with this light, even those whose ideas didn’t get adopted, because all of those things were well discussed making it easier to implement them into something else later on in a better way. Every original design goal has been exceeded, sometimes hugely and sometimes only by 50% (Only? When has another BLF special done that even in just one area? ). More has been added far beyond the original design and we’re still talking the same price we started with- now that is all simply amazing to me :sunglasses:

The wine is mature and nearly ready to be enjoyed which is the whole point of all the effort :+1:

Phil

Okay, okay, I give in. Please put me on the list for 1 unit.

Thanks.

(I know, list will be updated soon)

First of all let me make it crystal clear I am NOT one that is pushing for, suggesting, or advocating a dual footprint MCPCB.

I simply want/would like to know what the “design difference” is between a single & dual footprint board. That is all.

Some people are saying it would be no problem designing & making a dual footprint board.

Others are saying the exact opposite.

This leaves the mentally challenged, such as myself; confused…. to say the least. :person_facepalming:

Both groups can’t be right…. I don’ think anyway. :open_mouth:

Which group is correct??

Heck… just leave the Q8 out of it.

  • Is it harder to design & make a dual footprint board than a single footprint board??

That is ALL I really want to know. :slight_smile:

They both are correct because the question was not clearly defined.

Is it easy to change the design of the mcpcb to a dual footprint board? Yes

Is it easy for Thorfire to change the mcpcb to a dual footprint board? No

The Miller elaborated on the many reasons it’s not easy for Thorfire to do this.

I think anyone who said it would be easy for Thorfire to switch designs were purely speculating. I would have to defer to The Miller’s answer.

Thanks Jason, that answers what I wanted to know. :+1:

AFAIAC the rest of it is a mute point.

The explanation djozz gave several post back as to why it was a very bad idea to change anything about the MCPCB made perfect sense.
Perfect sense in that it could lead to untold Q8 misery with what TF might come up with. :smiley:

Nobody wants that possibility to be introduced any more than it already is. :wink:

And that is by far the best summary of the situation I’ve read so far! You are clearly enlightened. :slight_smile:

^ This too ^ :wink:

Phil

So it’s just down to locating new springs and dealing with board delamination, right?

I’m crossing my fingers both can be addressed soon.

Yes, that is right

Springs
Board
Narsil latest version
Manual (4 pages 1 general manual and 3 on par with Narsil)

Pretty close now

and

Flag these to be elaborated for a “lessons learned” reconsideration, once this is all over.

Now cue the ominous background music.

“What are they doing over there? It’s quiet. TOO quiet ….”

Somewhere out there, a bean-counting cheese-paring businessman is nibbling away at a design specification to make a little more profit on each piece.
https://www.google.com/search?q=scorpion+frog

You know things have gone a little too far when even Doctor Frankendale thinks it’s dangerous. :smiley:

I finally did some testing, now that I’m back from Asgard and have a working computer again. Not sure how much Tom will have time to change, or how much he wants to change. There don’t seem to be any important firmware issues, but there might be some small things to fix or some small improvements to add.

… and hopefully it won’t turn out like the X6v2, where the units shipped with old firmware. That was unfortunate.

+1, yes it is! Simple, factual, to the point.

Three great words…… :smiley:

Aside — has someone checked how “phosphor bronze” translates?

There’s been so much confusion because copper, brass, and bronze all seem to translate poorly to Chinese.

It would be good for them to know how Djozz’s phosphor springs made in Netherlands were specified — alloy? unique identification numbers?

Googling the term, there’s a wide range of variation:

I’m very pleased that the Q8 has a tripod mount, and I’ll credit myself for being the first to suggest it waaaaay back in post #25! :smiley:

The Noctigon Meteor doesn’t have a tripod mount, so I made one out of a quick-release ‘truss clamp’ used in concert and theater lighting.

This type of mount is rock-solid for attaching the Meteor to a bicycle, ATV, or anything that can have a screw or bolt fitted to it.

I’m hoping the clamp will fit the Q8, too.

Can someone with the latest Q8 prototype share the diameter at the center of the battery tube?

I realize the diameter may change slightly for final production, but the truss clamp works from about 1-7/8” to 2-1/8”.

Can I give measurements in mm? Inches are so strange to me.

Of course! I speak metric as well as imperial. :smiley:

BTW, 1 inch = exactly 25.4 mm.

Ha how tired I am, the caliper has a button to switch so I can give both, tomorrow, the Q8 is next to the bed and I know I just don’t want to bring it from there before I slept a little :wink:

Ah and yeah thanks for giving us a hard time making that tripod hole a part :smiley:
No joking, it is an awesome part, really thanks :wink:

The diameter in the middle of the battery tube, away from the flat bits is 50.0 mm.