There is no step down on the prototype and Utorch was asked to leave it that way on the next prototype/sample. So you will need to turn it down yourself when you think it’s getting too hot.
SS flat bezel is my idea, I feel that is more inline with modern lights design like X7, TN36 or MM25MB. SS bezel is much more durable and practical at the same time. After all, we are no creating a "tactical" class light here
X7R will be including a distance/ proximity sensor as a safety feature. Will be sick if they are able to incorporate such feature in UT03.
it is probably because of the BLF Q8 for most member either this or Q8 well i am simple person i take both
I hope we still get good deal even below 500.
What is the idea of the proximity sensor? Is that just a safety feature in case it gets set down while on a high mode? I could honestly do without that myself, but I’ve never seen it before in other lights.
XHP70 has more of the doughnut hole correct? The 70.2 fixes that but it has an inconsistent beam? I don’t actually know what I’m talking about. My only preferences on this thing would be something more neutral white, but I’m interested in the light either way. Still a great deal on a light that puts out around 10k lumens.
It still has the donut hole. I tried a xhp50.2 in my L6 with SMO reflector and got a noticable donut hole. I’m sure the 70.2 will be the same. I’ll be trying it out soon. Maybe it will be a bit less noticable? You have to find a good compromise between sharp focus (and a donut hole) or a less focused, but nicer looking beam.
You’d getter higher output if the light used a fet driver, but this one doesn’t. Are you planning to swap a fet driver in?
Do you mean better performance as in the higher forward voltage of the 70.2 allows for better efficiency at the same output the xhp70?
I like better runtimes, but it’s not high on my priority list when it comes to a light like this.