need more beamshots
enough of this shipping talk 
Haha Mr.Scott, it is such a gift you decided to do the sorting and make mass PMs easier with SB
It takes away a lot of hunen error possibility , very useful in this strange GT situation that is rather complex and where errors could lead to very unhappy people, can’t thank you enough 
I would not feel comfortable dedoming an XHP35, and am glad there is the hi version to be used.
I take my hat of to those who dare do it 
how about some beamshots or updates about changes in the carriers or photos of the new reflector instead of the money, shipping, taxes talk?
Yes when definite things are known we will post it ASAP
I just had a thought that worried me, what if there is a problem or glitch with the PM system and some people on the list don’t get the payment request message and miss their opportunity to send their down-payment on time… 
Can I ask that when you start sending the mass PM’s that you update the list so we all know what members in the list have been sent the payment request, and who has already paid?
What do you all think?
we are about to test the mass pm sending.
of course a list of people paid will be kept
And yes it seems smart to post the nicknames of those to whom the pm is send to, good idea
So is entry still possible?
Would be awesome if my name was on the List
AMEN brother ! :+1:
Yes will do!
@TheMiller:
I asked to be on the list for one GT but don’t see my name on it.
See post 4336 on page 145.
Oh dang that needs correcting!
Sorry will do.
Please check if you are on the list as you want, I might have missed things.
Apologies if so, it will be corrected.
… Thank you Mr. Scott!!!
I love that “simple answer”…… :+1:
.
Hi, please could you erase my second unit? It was for a friend but he isn’t interested now… so I’m still interested in my first unit
Anthon 129 331
Could you please take me off the list for my second light. #415 on the main list.
I still want one, but only 1.
Thanks!
New beam-shot. I swapped out the prototype’s cool-ish LED with a 3A-bin neutral white (the production units will also come with neutral white emitters):
Original LED:
Both shots were done using 5 s exposure, manual white balance, ISO100. Distance to tree is 150 m / 500 ft.
At first I wasn’t sure I agreed with calling it “Giggles”… but looking at Giggles next to other lights I think you’re right. That’s it’s name: The BLF Giggle Thrower, or Giggles for short.
I think you’re probably right, and it likely doesn’t need more than it already has… but I could probably patch in more detailed thermal regulation (copy/paste from the D4 v2 code) if it’s needed, or you could too.
With the GT’s mass-to-power ratio though, it’s probably fine.
what are we looking at for the final numbers
1.1 ? 1.2 ?
sure hoping its more than that on the finished product
theres modded tn42s running around out there ,with over a mill lux, and at half the size of the gt to boot
Isn’t it possible to put CW leds in several lights?I think there are enough members who prefer those leds.
Well it is really interesting, CW gives higher numbers but in all but the ideal circumstances NW shows more to the user.
It is well known that the NW tints are preferred by most who have seen it side by side with CW.
Yet of course “most” =/= “all”