Lumileds Luxeon V, test of a 4000K 70CRI emitter

:+1: PM sent. I will do a new Luxeon V test on this boards and am really curious how much different it is. My guess: slightly better performance but way easier reflow!!

Have you tried a Luxeon V in a flashlight yet and if so, what is your experience?

Will that be for sale on your website soon? Looks good! Really want to see this emitters potential on a properly sized board.

Thank you very much Sir!

Another test that saved my wallet…

I plan to use this LED to my DIY host zoommy, because It has almost round LED.

@djozz

I'll build Convoy S2+ with LD-A4 this weekend

@Jensen567

Yes, I'll put boards on my web page very soon.

Hey Neven,
Nice board!
Will you have the LEDs for sale too?

Hope that the boards and a high bin Luxeon V will be available in your shop. Can not wait to do a Q8 mod with this leds on DTP boards!

Nobody dedomed it yet?
I’m really interested in whether it throws better than SST-40…

As mentioned in the OP, my predictions for the luminance gain after dedoming (if at all it works) are not good, this being a flip-chip design.

I think it could be interesting in triples and quads, though it depends on the actual die size.

Finally added PCBs (and LEDs:) to webshop:

Luxeon V: link

L4P 4040 DTP 16mm for Luxeon V : link

Note: since I'm on vacation until next Friday, orders will be processed and shipped after 13th October.

:+1: :+1: :+1:

Wouldn’t this LED be a good choice for FET driven 3x AA lights (e. g. Convoy X3, powered by Eneloop cells)?

That is a good price for the DTP board for a Luxeon V.

I got my led4power 4040 boards in (thanks!) and did test the Luxeon V on this dedicated board, I will try to crush the numbers this weekend and post the result. In short: I found hardly a performance gain (very slightly though), but the ease of reflow makes this board well worth using. I expect the reliability to be higher as well.

I did one not so great mod with the Luxeon V, I put one in a Olight S15 (AA) flashlight and hoped that the low Vf, and thus less voltage difference to boost, would increase the current and output compared to the stock XM-L2. But it is apparently not that simple, instead, I found just 180 lumen with the Luxeon V, compared to the ~250 lumen of the stock XM-L2. It must be something measured different in the electronics that makes it get less current.

The VG10 with the direct driver and Luxeon V is still one h*ll of a light, great beam, great tint and with a half-drained 30Q it still puts out 1700 lumen (at still 6.5A current, 75lm/W flashlight efficiency).

Edit: some numbers corrected and added

With these leds available for well over a month (now at RS-online as well), are there more experiences out there using these in flashlights?

I found a similar effect with putting red 660nm and yellow 585nm LEDs in SF-348 lights.
They get less warm too.

Apparently there’s things about boost drivers that are counter-intuitive.

Isn’t it that the driver is just constant current and the only benefit from low Vf is longer regulation and (if present) higher efficiency?

At least that would be some crazy efficient 180 lumens. Will be placing an order for the boards and emitters soon.

I’m not totally impressed by the efficiency, I measure 2.4A at the tail, an Eneloop runs at 2.4A at around 1.25V, so that is 3W of power and thus 60lm/W. For a light that needs boosting from a NiMh cell that may be alright actually, but at least some of my flashlights with li-ion cells go over 100lm/W.