You get those silly petals in the spill too, when you cut away parts of it.
Or more and in tact, like 7, with smaller die LEDs.
For basic consistency it must have the same way to turn OFF in all groups. And fast click is preferable.
Interested to do a review, compare it with Meteor. Can do it on Fonarevka.
+1 on jerommels idea. Change the outer tube design to not look like any cheap SRK clone. Make it a big block knurling or big diamond shape but not the SRK.
Info updated 
Suggestions people have made that I find golden:
- Nichia option, specially the 90+ CRI 5000k that is starting to show up
- TIR optics, specially to get it on the throwier side of SRKs
- A BLF driver to get it closer to the community (andúril compatible, of course)
PS: there is and extra “n” in my name in the suggestion and review-interest list
Name corrected, sorry :person_facepalming:
no problem
That’s why I suggest eliminating the reflectors and using Carclo optics like the Emisar D4 has, although to fit it’d have to be the 16mm 3 emitter version like in the Convoy S2/S3 triples. Other than parts, all it needs is a spacer, and the machining on that could be kept very simple.
I think Sofirn adding a larger light into their lineup is a good idea.
That said, I think differentiating it from the Q8 is a wise idea.
I love my Q8 lights and use them every chance I get but they’re on the large size. If Sofirn chose a slightly smaller (3x18650) size, it might be just that much more easily carried.
To piggyback on other’s ideas, I like something different in the led department, with a warmer to neutral tint with a nice balance of flood and throw. How that is done is up to them or others with more experience than I have.
Ramping would be great, but I personally wouldn’t need all the bells and whistles that the Q8 has. I leave it in ramping and love it that way.
All said, I’d love something a little different than the Q8, perhaps a little smaller and simplified for an even more affordable cost. Not sure if Sofirn is looking that way, but that’s my $0.02.
I’d also like to be considered for testing out a prototype.
In 6 LEDs there is no practical sense. Blinds close. In the distance it shines badly.
I agree with the proposal to make a normal deep reflector for 3 LEDs. If you want a very large power - put XHP50.2
Need 3-5mm base with a direct heatsink to the case.
Do not do another skyrayking. There are already so many of them on aliexpress.
Make a cartridge for 4 batteries, buck driver for xhp50.2@12v
Look at Niwalker MM20EB
You dont need any spacer. Maybe just solid central rod with thin tube for 21700.
Yes, I dont have decision for negative end springs. So let it be 3x21700.
I would like to see another successful triple design from Sofirn. IMHO, they did a solid job on the C8F. I think a Q8-inspired, C8F hybrid has a good potential, provided the design is nailed right. I think a triple design would make a good sweet spot. Plus, the cost–performance ratio would be desirable, as far as Sofirn is concerned, which means better pricing for the K6. By triple design, I mean three (3) strong LED emitters that can really deliver. As suggested above, XHP 50.2 makes sense considering the cost. The only problem, I think, is containing the heat. Maybe three (3) XHP 50.2 in 6-volt configuration at half of their max forward current?
Also, it would be superb if they could make the K6 host available for sale, in the same spirit and continuing the tradition of their C8 versions.
Suggestions above added!
BTW, seeing some suggestions, I remind that Sofirn has a 3x18650 / XHP50 flashlight, reviewed here by Lexel .
Maybe this helps on thinking the design/functions of the K6 as well
Interested I want 3 xhp70.2 emitter and 4×18650
Suggestion added
Interested I want 3 xhp70.2 emitter and 4×18650.
Suggestions added!
BUT:
PLEASE NOTE that this is NOT a groupbuy !
This is a discussion thread about the possible specs of the new Sofirn model!
I listed your names (suratyu and Andybibbville) under the interest list for reviewers/testers, not for a “group buy!!
I had forgotten about that.
After re-reading the review, it might be a worthy venture for Sofirn to address the shortcomings and produce a great performing light, even if they go with a different platform (4x18650 and different emitter setup).
I wonder what pricepoint they’re going after. If it’s going to be less expensive than a Q8 or similar 4x18650 lights that have been released recently, what options are they willing to lose? Simpler UI? Less machining? Less involved emitter setup? No spring bypass?
I’d say that dealing with heat and having an up to date UI are the most important features. Ramping is popular right now and I’ve got four lights with it and don’t really want anything else. I love my D4, but it makes me a bit nervous with the amount of heat on tap and the risk of melting/burning something (especially me!). XHP70 emitters put out a lot of lumens, but dang they get hot! I know practicality isn’t on everyone’s agenda, but I’d rather have a light that put out a good amount of lumens with a good balance of throw and flood instead of a hot rod. Making it moddable (no glue!) would satisfy those who want to tweak it and still keep it usable and safe for those who don’t.
Since Sofirn came on the market as a budget priced light, are they going to follow that model or is this going to be in the $80-$100+ price range? If it’s going to be less expensive, drop any ideas of changing ports and box candy. A few extra o-rings should do it.
Comments and questions added
NOTE
To the members that have already posted and that may post from now on, please do not update your previous posts if I already added the given suggestions.
You can “quote” yourselves on a new post and add the information there!
Or, if you want to update/edit the posts, please make a “EDIT” note so that I can easily spot what you’ve written recently!!
The only posts I wanted to be continuously updated/edited are posts #1 , #2 and #3, where emerging information is being added from the member’s posts or from other relevant things for the discussion/organization!
Sorry folks, but it is better for me to follow your suggestions this way! I hope you understand! 
Thank you :nerd_face: