One is the newer desert tan with a warm XPL-HI U4-7A and 7135 x 8. The other is a grey $6.99 bargain that I bought to modify. That one has a cold white XML2 U2 1B and 7135 x 6.
I was surprised how different they are. The build quality is similar. Both have good fit and finish, for the price. Both use the same UI with two modes. Iâve put both of them into the no strobe mode for now.
Now for the differences:
PWM on the grey one is audible. I canât hear the tan one but I have high frequency hearing loss.
The $12.99 desert tan light came in a sturdy box with cut foam. The bargain came is a flimsy box with a bit of bubble wrap.
The desert tan light has a more elaborate lanyard. At first glance, Iâm not sure which one is better. We shall see. It also has a clip while the grey one does not. The clip is black powder coated and looks functional. It is in the box photo above but doesnât show up.
The tan (brown?) host is about 1mm longer. The heads are different.
âŚ.
I was expecting the tail switches to be different. The grey switch is much like my L6.
Nice, I have been considering a tan one.
Someone at Convoy needs to get their machinery/settings adjusted though - those âConvoyâ logoâs are very crooked, annoyingly so when all stood up!
Unfortunately my eyes get easily drawn to stuff like that, and then itâs all I see! must be ocd or something lol!
Nice The Convoy collection is growing
Do you mind to take a beamshot comparison between these new two S2+? Iâve been thinking about the 7A tint and how it looks!
I thank you in advance AndâŚlet us see the mods youâll perform :smiling_imp:
BTW, just to confirm, the Desert Tan version was the only one of my 5 S2+ that arrived in that neat box
And I had one if the with the âoldâ driver, but I donât remember hearing it! I then replaced that driver for a Biscotti one and I must say I prefer it (no trouble when going through the modes )
Thanks, and no problem with the time
I just found it funny because I have at least 5 different tints from LEDs bought on Convoy store (XML2 U2-1A, XML2 T6-3B, XML2 T6-4C, XPL-HI U6-3A and XPL-HI U6-4C) but I have none of those 2 you have, so I am just curious to see how they look
When you have the time and tools, no worries Thanks in advance!!!
Usually the types without rubber switchcover come with the luxurious box, other lanyard and clip. The drivers are the same, the head of the tan is different due to the extra mount for the clip, so you can reverse it.
Plus, the tail of the S2+ is slightly longer due to the internal structure for the metal switch, although this difference doesnât seem to register on the other S2+ with metal buttons!!
I have a xml-2 7A3 tint and itâs very close to a tungsten light. Nice warm yellowish tone. On lower settings itâs very pleasant. On higher settings it seems a bit dimmer. Then again mine is driven only to 0.9 amp.
Same here, my Sand and Blue models ordered from Simon at the end of Nov. look straight to me (but i guess my eyes could be crooked lol). I think the way the logo is designed can play some tricks too. The combo of italics, different size letters, and the first letter sitting on top of the tail of the last letter might skew the brainâs idea of parallel lines.
That said, my magnets fit the Sand perfectly (goes in a little then friction fits the rest of the way). But the same magnets can go in and out of the tail of the Blue S2+ without even touching. When i sent Simon a message wondering if this was within his tolerances or not he simply said âthe oxide layer has errorâ.
So who knows, maybe they do need to make adjustments and these lights will look crooked beside later S2+âs. I think they are still worth getting even if the logo was super jacked, but i can understand how seeing something that doesnât look right can make one wonder about the other aspects of the product. Also might be of note (as others have already stated) that the Sandâs head is uniqueâŚread new⌠even compared to the other metal switch models, so maybe the tolerances are closer to original on that model (all tolerances can vary somewhat even on the most expensive equipment due to age, wear, environmental conditions, or my favorite like Goose said calibration, etcâŚ).
Also if you decide to get a Sand S2+, i believe the Biscotti firmware in a stock light is only available from Simon.
The S2+ Sand colored is considered a bit more premium and hence costs double even while in discount.
As for the audible PWM, itâs most probably due to bad grounding.
Try to improve the soldering of the driver to the pill and tighten the tail retaining ring after cleaning the tailâs inner threads first.
Quick beam shots in my office. Far from ideal but should give a general idea. Camera is a Panasonic Lumix GF2. 100 ASA 1/60 sec f/3.5
I do like U4-7A a lot more than the U2-1B which I find cold and harsh.
U4-7A is close to the same colour as tungsten but has an odd âyellowâ feel to it. If you have 80 CRI 2500 or 3000k LEDs at home you may know what I mean. It is very similar.
The photos are close to what the beam patterns look like to my eyes. Camera is too close to get the edges. Iâll try and get some outdoor shots when I can. Colours is close but doesnât accurately reflect the slight oddness of the U4-7A.
Andrew_Debbie, thank you very much for taking the time to take these beamshots!! :+1:
Indeed, the 7A is much more âyellowishâ than my taste actually allows to use! But, it is not bad, just not my preference
The XML2 T6-4C is not so warm and seems to be less âoddâ !
The 1B seems to be a mix of Neutral and Cold white, right?
If I had to make a comparison, it is not so blue as the XML2 U2-1A, but maybe not so neutral as the XML2 T6-3B (for what can be seen from the images)!
Thank you once again for taking the photos
Best regards!! :+1:
Yes, itâs not as good as incandescent light, but itâs the only âbudgetâ light I know of that sells a stock ~3000K emitter. It makes a great tail-stand light when watching a movie.