Haikelite MT09R Test/Review Beam video footage.

+1

From the emails and basically no one seems to know anything I do believe it is lost or destroyed.

This much later it really does not matter that much now as I will have a shipment of 70.2's arriving tomorrow I believe and sometime in the next week a second shipment which will have both 70.2 versions as well as 35 High versions... And I will still try as best I can to make sure footage gets posted as fast a possible,

Some of you may have your own by that time but if by chance they have not arrived I will be posting footage ass soon as that second shipment arrives.

I should have also said that once that first shipment arrives and I get them all inventoried into the system and each one is inspected and tested they will be available for sale on the stores website.


No, I don’t think my XHP35hi is 7500lumens. This is a comparison of ceiling bounce with my Emisar D4.

Pretty sure I just explained that.

The lights shipping now will hit the mark...

Do you have a MT09R 35 high?

I'm asking because if you do we need to find where it came from.

The only lights sent out with the driver that is not pushing enough power were samples... and very very few.

Oh, I got it directly from a china supplier. Maybe that explains why. And the tint looks cool white to me, the box says otherwise (5000k) .



Thanks for the shots, the beam looks pretty tight. Any chance for a shot in a darker environment? We are all eagerly waiting for some images of the 35 hi…

Thank you!

That’s a tight hotspot! :+1:

The sun has not set :smiley:

The hotspot size is as big as my Olight M31. But the brightness from the hotspot to the end of the spill is more gradual.

Like I mentioned only 5 MT09R's in 35 high left the factory with that driver and those still had a light output of 5k lumen...

And the chances of 2 of those 5 lights ending up suddenly being talked about on tje same day in just a couple of hours of each other.

The first one has no means of testing anything but still somehow named a lumen output. Which is pretty close to the 5k that particular driver was pushing out. The secobd one we are not seeing and those must be some close and shiny cillings.

I will wait a few more days and get one from the production run and test it with actual measuring equimpment and see how well it performs.

All sarcasm aside. If you have an MT09R 35 high Dale has asked where they were acquired from.

The 5 samples should not be easily available and they want to locate them so they can have the correct driver installed.

If you will contact Dale he will arrange for tthe driver replacment.

Thanks very much

yeah hot spot look tight.

i wonder how much throw compare to MT07

https://i.imgur.com/rBPoGfk.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/g69nHtb.jpg

I got it from a China supplier and they are sending me another one with updated drivers. Thanks for clarifying.

[quote=Nicolicous]
yeah hot spot look tight. i wonder how much throw compare to MT07[/quote

With the corrected driver it should throw about 400 meters more...

I'm still trying to figure out where these came from..

I don't even have any yet and I have a lot more than 1 ordered.

Contact Dale... Haikelite Original is his username on here and he will get that driver swapped out.

Care is required when doing a ceiling bounce test for output measurement. The D4 is a significantly floodier light than the MT09R XHP35, which could result in non linear relation between lux reading and lumen output.

I think this should be “HaikeLite Official”. :beer:

Thanks for the video Jason! :+1: You’ve got an amazing view there! :smiley:
… And yeah, that hotspot is tight! :beer:

Taken from smart phone auto mode.
.
MT07 CW sliced dome 4S version

.
.
.
MT09R 3 x XHP35 Hi CW

^ Looks pretty much identical to me (unfortunately).

Hold on:

Is this OK? Shouldn’t you have fixed settings for both shots? With auto mode your camera is going to correct for the brighter light (if it’s brighter).