Cool, that’s about 35% less than their 3,000 lumen rating. Is yours CW or NW? Usually the CW will read a bit higher than NW.
Newlumen: JasonWW: klrman:Is it safe to assume the MT35 Plus will have around 30% less lumens than advertised just like the MF02?
The latest MF02 seem to be pulling 2.5A to 3A at the emitter. I guess it was recently bumped up to this. I don’t think you can get any more out of the xhp35-HI. 3A might even be too much. I think this is about 2,000 to 2,200 otf. Somewhere around there.
I would expect the MF04 to match this. It can’t be any higher and I doubt they would dial it lower.
So that’s about 27% to 33% less than 3,000 lumen. So yes, about 30% less.
If you look at the ads for the MT35 Plus, you will see they list it at 2700 lumen. That’s still exaggerated. Actual output should be about 18% to 26% less for that advertised spec.
Still, we won’t know for sure until it’s actually measured.
Hey jason, i measured 1930 lumen with my TA lumen tube… i used sony vtc6.
1970 with sony vtc5d…
This light can take unprotected flat top…
Cool, that’s about 35% less than their 3,000 lumen rating. Is yours CW or NW? Usually the CW will read a bit higher than NW.
It’s CW…
New LED、New Color
Astrolux “MF0?”
Is that XHP 70.2 in production soon?
the 70.2 would be a great addition
Damn I just got my jetbeam dm15 and now you are saying mt70 plus will be In production soon… I will definitely get that one too…
MT70 Plus looks great!
As for my Mateminco, it is a great performer. Handles its heat well. I get over 2,300 at start and it holds it well.
MT70 Plus looks great!
As for my Mateminco, it is a great performer. Handles its heat well. I get over 2,300 at start and it holds it well.
So how do you like your astrolux mf04 ??
Rusty Joe:MT70 Plus looks great!
As for my Mateminco, it is a great performer. Handles its heat well. I get over 2,300 at start and it holds it well.
So how do you like your astrolux mf04 ??
I can’t speak for anyone else but my MF04 has been great so far
Newlumen: Rusty Joe:MT70 Plus looks great!
As for my Mateminco, it is a great performer. Handles its heat well. I get over 2,300 at start and it holds it well.
So how do you like your astrolux mf04 ??
I can’t speak for anyone else but my MF04 has been great so far
Nice. I am glad you like it. i think astrolux nailed it…
Pros…
Will shine 1.89 km or 1.17 mles. ( from steel beamshot )
Led is perfectly centered and sit correctly…
boost driver.
Very efficient…
4 modes… nice and simple!
New upgrade design battery carrier
Improved and solid indicator switch.
CW or NW option available.
New LED、New Color
Astrolux “MF0?”
Has to be MF07, right?
Maybe the Astrolux X model can be the MF06.
Do you have any info on what driver the 70.2 light is using? Maybe use a 6v led and a FET driver?
Is that XHP 70.2 in production soon?
Yes, soon
1. 5 modes
2. Strobe、SOS、Beacon
3. Locked
Yes, 6V driver
1. 5 modes
2. Strobe、SOS、Beacon
3. Locked
That looks a lot like their version 2 boost driver from the MF01. I see just a few small changes.
Do you think it’s 6 volt in and 12 volt out?
You are right, It’s a 12V driver.
You are right, It’s a 12V driver.
This makes sense as the MF01 v2 driver is 21v out and can do 12000 lumen or so. So its more than powerful enough for a single xhp70.2. I’m sure this driver can do 12v at about 5A to 6A. So it’s maybe over 6,000 lumen? It gives steady output as well.
I’m just here for steel_1024’s gorgeous photos. :partying_face:
Excellent work, as always! :+1:
I see you use flickr for hosting. How do I get to your page?
Here’s a better comparison.
.
Rusty Joe:MT70 Plus looks great!
As for my Mateminco, it is a great performer. Handles its heat well. I get over 2,300 at start and it holds it well.
So how do you like your astrolux mf04 ??
Haven’t got it yet. I have no doubt it will be amazing, though!
MT70 Plus vs MT35 Plus beam comparison