(prototype) the GT Mini

Oh, I know it’ll beat it. It’s just a matter of how much, and how dramatic the visual difference is. A comparison with the D1S would probably be the best, but I’m not sure if M4DM4X has access to one.

The difference in those pictures is easily the difference between XM-L2 and XP-L HI, given the same emitters and same or similar power levels there won’t be a lot of difference between the C8 and Mini GT in beam profile or throw, I’m thinking.

But the Mini GT is actually a shorter, more compact, light, albeit slightly larger in diameter, and the side switch set’s them apart quite nicely. It becomes more of a matter of style choice, the 3-legged dog that is the C8 or a nice neat style reference to the Throwmaster in the Mini GT’s big brother.

Is today a leather loafer day or a hiking boot day? Teva sandals or all out running shoes? :wink:

unfortunaely i neither own a C8 with a HI LED nor a D1S


Nice, that is exactly what I was thinking given the GT Mini has twice the lumens, no dome and a slightly bigger reflector.

I have zero use for C8 style lights (small throwers) and did not sign up for the mini. Now I think I will. Let me head over to the sign up page.

If I found a host C8 with side switch and xpl-hi plus bought a driver from Lexel to get NarsilM I would be at $40+ I’m sure, then I would have to actually build the thing and it still wouldn’t look as cool as the GT Mini. Lol

Can you make a comparison with a well driven C8? With BLF A6 driver or similar?

if you send me one I can do :D

I am in for 3x

Thanks

Jens

Did you sign up?

The sign-up list is over here.

Thanks for the hint I made.
Super deal you make again.
Many Thanks
greeting
Jens

Interested for 1 mini GT thanks.

See post 274.

Already done JasonWW thanks, this is only for to be sure.

I’m also in for one or two…
In case the budget allows it :wink:

Does the GT mini have current control / stable output?

There aren’t any driver details yet.

The XPL can certainly go higher than 4.5A, so it might not be a FET driver. We will get details eventually.

Question, if the light pushes 1200lumens or more on that emitter, how hard is that pushing the emitter before its getting dangerous ?

XPL-HI are known to do 7.5A and 2000 lumen in raw form. So the GT Mini is not maxing it out.

At 4.5A it can do about 1500 lumen. So in a light with its losses, let’s guess 20%, you get about 1200 lumen. So the lumen numbers seem realistic.

(This is according to Koef3’s tests)

Never seen an XP-L HI get close to 2000 lumens. But I’ve only used a few hundred of em, might not have gotten a good batch. :wink:

Edit: To answer the question, I’ve been pushing the XP-L and it’s HI variants as hard as Li-ion power supplies can drive them ever since Cree made them available. Haven’t had one fail to date. I use the XP-L HI for a mile+ thrower at 6.49A, not a problem.

Edit II: Jason, it’s confusing enough when the Chinese manufacturer’s use emitter lumens to quote their lights, please refrain from that practice as it only complicates things for new people with questions. :wink: Now, I HAVE seen an XP-L W2 HD make over 2000 lumens in a flashlight, and of course the XP-L2 can surpass that and does, easily taking amperage that would fry anything else in it’s Cree family (XP-XM class). [The XP-L W2 was a rare bird, don’t know if any are still available]

This is the raw led in an integrating sphere with a power supply and good cooling.

Once you put it in a flashlight you get all the associated losses.

Here is Koef3’s review. I’m almost positive he uses a professionally calibrated integrating sphere.

.

Irrelevant dude, it can’t come close in a flashlight powered by Li-ion cells. If it can’t do it in our lights, why even bother to quote it?

And you still haven’t learned how to properly size an image for sharing? :person_facepalming: