Acebeam X70 - 40000 lm - 8*18650 - Active fan cooling

The lumen monster hater, stick to threads about 200 lumen high CRI specials.

under water fan cooled
But really I want me these :crown:

Yes, Dmitriyrus mentioned that model in my thread on Actively Cooled lights, but I never put it in post #1. I guess I can do that now.

Youā€™ve gotten your facts wrong.

Again.

:person_facepalming:

Thought my facts ā€œlook reasonableā€

Lmfao

The X70 will read 25,000 lumens on the gutter pipe, you heard it here first.

Why do you have to go around insulting everybody?

:person_facepalming:

Ps. PVC based lumen tubes have a long tradition on BLF and CPF. Texas_Aceā€™s is probably the best version yet.

Ugh, I give up. Your right, everybody else is wrong, etcā€¦etcā€¦

:person_facepalming:

You canā€™t reason with him. I believe in the tube thread it said he was given a partial refund which he accepted. From what Iā€™ve read, TA was trying to work with him and even offered an addittional larger refund. He would rather bash TAā€™s name and reputation and continues to do so. Iā€™ve found in life when a single person continues to have problems they blame on others, often they have to look at themselves first.

Most of what Iā€™ve read from KG seems so against what Iā€™m used to at BLF, we have a great community here and I hope that doesnā€™t go away.

Iā€™ve publicly offered him the partial refund back too.

All I care about is warning people not to fall for the scam.

It all became too personal and my nationality brought into it.

The other three dozen customers who bought the TA lumen sphere didnt experience the same issues you have. I posted my measurements with the TA sphere and they were in line with ratings from reputable manufacturers whether they are low powered lights or high power lights, flooders and throwers. You were the only one with issues so we tried to help you figure out the reasons but you werent interested in working with us and instead just interested in proving your accusations are right without doing it scientifically.

We are about to recive the Maukka calibration lights so we can verify scientifically how accurate the current calibration of the TA spheres are.

This is off topic, but itā€™s possible to get accurate measurements with any lumen tube as long as you have a reputable lux meter and
Correct multiplier. The differser sheets are a nice addition to the tube.

The issue was the few cmā€™s of tube wall before the 1st diffuser, light from heavy flooders would hit those walls and be absorbed. Then thereā€™s the fact the multiple diffusers would take a fixed percentage of light off the total calculated output. Which meant a 1000 lumen light would lose a 100 lumens off the total and a 100 lumen light would lose 10 lumens, unavoidable using heavy diffusing, basically the higher powered the light the greater the overall lumens lost, though at roughly the same percentage, some higher powered lights had a slightly higher percentage due to them being extra floody (side wall) whilst still having high Candela (bounce back), the DX80 lost around 10,000 lumens. Lights with high Candela seemed to be suffering from a possible direct bounce back from the first diffuser.

The only lights that would read correctly would be those similar to what the tube was calibrated with. All my 30+ lights read too low and every light Iā€™ve seen published has read too low.

Basically my 30,000 lumen light is recording 2,000 lux on the Texas_Ace tube then x 10 by the meter for 20,000

My 3,000 lumen light is recording 200 lux and x 10 for 2,000

The tube is not quite calibrated, it would be better x 15 but itā€™d still penalise heavy flooders, sitting the lights on the diffuser got me a lot closer to Maukkaā€™s results (I have most of the lights he tested and some multiples of the same so I know they are all within a few % of each other) but it would only really boost the flooders.

Oh God, are we really doing this again?! And in another, unrelated thread?! Really KG_Tuning, you need to drop this. Nobody here wants to hear you go on and on about it, the site owner has already warned you and locked one thread over it, and yet here we are againā€¦weeks later. This isnā€™t a good look manā€¦

Agreed

OMG, you just selectively choose to ignore the data posted to show the TA tube does not favor flooders over throwers. The MT03 super flooder with the same driver and emitters as the throwier MT09R measures about the same lumens, which CLEARLY says your accusation of the TA tube favoring flooders is simply not true for other TA tube users. If you just choose to not read what others post and not willing to work with us to find out the reason for the issues you are claiming, thereā€™s no point of continuing this discussion.

The MS 2010, PowerTac X10000 Destroyer, and Microfire Challenger H5 look really good with alot of potential for emitter swaps. Iā€™m wondering why they werenā€™t popular and why nobody modded them for more power.

So that X70ā€¦

I would imagine their prices where much higher than normal lights and most people just did not see or understand the benefits.

For example, the PowerTac X10000 Destroyer is currently being sold for $700. People probably think the price is too high for only 10k lumen.

Some of the other lights might have reliability issues. Who knows? They may not have been marketed well, either.

If I was a talented modder and I didnā€™t know the X70 and MF05 is coming out, I would probably buy it at $700 and swap the emitters. Would be amazing to have sustainable 15k-20k lumen output in such a small size.