Yeah, Neutral would be better for me as well. But, assuming Sofirn keeps the same mod-ability that the original Q8 has, it should be possible to change to whatever CCT is desired. If it’s the same size PCB, then even the size of the emitter can be changed by using a led4power Q8 MCPCB.
Seems pointless to even discuss right now. The only change they said they have made is putting in HI leds instead of HD. None of the other more interesting changes are even designed yet… If someone wants a neutral Q8 there is already the real original Q8 with HD leds that had an excellent combination of flood and throw already.
The only CW lights, which I are in, are of CRI 90 or above. Unfortunately there is no 90 CRI option for first gen. XPL in either HD or HI. There is no second generation XP-L (XP-L2) HI, and XP-L2 kinda sucks regarding tint consistency. I'd hope for an XHP35 90 CRI 5700K version of the Q8 (maybe 6500K is also fine, but 90 CRI is required for me).
I would really appreciate a 3 batteries tube/carrier working with the new Q8. Maybe another one with a down-compatibility to the BLF-Q8 with a different end (positive contact to the driver).
Neutral white 90 CRI for the leds, preferably not Cree because most have a “rainbow effect”.
Awesome. The source code has some requirements in its license though. On the product page, could you add a notice that it uses free software, and add a link to the source code?
You’re right, it’s not the v1.5, it is the “traditional” Q8, but a bit different from the BLF Q8 anyway. It does have the XPL HI and some other changes noted by Sofirn.
I like the battery tube more than on the old Q8, too.
But - What does the “T” on the switch stand for?
I thought it stands for the manufacturer of the old Q8 - THorfire - will we get a different switch-cover on the Sofirn Q8?
Or are they also manufactured by Thorfire??
Sofirn is the company who made the Q8 for Thorfire. I don’t know if they will source new covers. They probably have hundreds of the T logo covers and will just continue using them. Maybe they will comment on it. It makes no difference to me.
Love the options that Sofirn is bringing to the table, some excellent and some not such great ideas. Well, Sofirn’s ideas appear sound but the ideas of going for 20,000 lumens in this light are sure to get someone in a bind somewhere. Insufficient cooling. Take it from someone who knows…