T stands for nothing but for better finger touching. It could be many dots or other designs but we already have this. We might use new design of the cap if there is good new idea.
I want a seperate battery tube that use 3*26650 or 3*21700, or some big boys like that. That way i can have longgggg run time thanks to the bigger cells. And when needed i can switch to the conventional 18650 tube again with no hassle. What do you think? :face_with_monocle:
3 x 26650 5700mah = 17100mah
3 x 21700 5000mah = 15000mah
4 x 18650 3500mah = 14000mah
Thereās not a big difference. If using the 26650 Shockli 5500 or Keeppower 6000 (both are about 5700mah) then you get a 22% increase in capacity. That would help a little, but not a whole lot.
Aye, but iām using only 3000mAh cells. Beside when the voltage drop (say after 40mins-1h)so does the light. Iām hoping the 26650 can retain the high output a little longer? I have little experience with these cell honestly, just looking for a reason to try them out
You can see that the 26650 has the highest combination of capacity and amperage. This is because itās the biggest physical battery. Itās double the physical size of an 18650 and the 21700 is in the middle at 50% bigger than an 18650.
The problem here is 3 x 26650 is too big a diameter to fit in the Q8 battery tube.
4 x 18650 can fit in a 44mm circle
3 x 21700 can fit in a 46mm circle
3 x 26650 needs a 57mm circle
Also keep in mind that you donāt need crazy amperage for the Q8. Typical is 15A with maybe 20A the max. So letās look at the loads of each cell at 5A.
So if you want the longest run time at high outputs, not considering heat, then the middle of the road 18650 3000mah and 21700 4000mah is your best bet. Both give you the same 12000mah capacity. So thereās no real benefit switching to 3 x 21700.
If you want the longest run time at low levels, then the high capacity 18650 3500mah and 21700 5000mah are you best bet. These have an advantage at the lower voltage levels between 2.8v to 3.2v to give extra run time. Switching from 4 x 18650 to 3 x 21700 only gives you a 7% increase in capacity, though.
The best of both worlds would be a bigger battery tube to fit 3 x 26650, but I donāt see that happening.
Is the CDR number indicate discharge rate at all time, like until the battery is nearly depleted or itās just the average rate? I like to be able to hit turbo even with low battery if thatās possible. I also hear with enough current you can boost the brightness off the chart up to nearly 7000lm, that iām a bit ambitious with.
On the side note: Are there any way for the user to calibrate the temperature sensor of the light? It kinda pointless having a thermometter that isnāt accurate isnāt it?
On these lights āturboā is just āas much as the battery can supply to the LEDā - you will always be able to get to turbo but it will drop in brightness relative to your battery voltage/current for the entire time you have it on. So turbo at 25% battery will be quite a bit less than turbo @ 100% battery. There are more advanced lights and boost drivers that will give a more constant current despite battery level but they are quite a bit more expensive (ex: Noctigon Meteor M43)
It isnt pointless to have to temperature set wrong. Depending on the firmware some will allow you to set the step down in two ways:
1) in config mode there is a way to get it to go in Turbo and you hold it there until you think the light should step down. It sets the ceiling. This is a relative temperature and as long as itās consistent itās very much still worth it.
2) Some of ToyKeeperās newer firmware will let you program in the ambient temperature and then you choose a step down based on a temperature value you choose
Turbo is not a specific number of lumens; it is direct drive. Brightness is determined by where the LEDās forward voltage curve meets the batteryās discharge curve. And, at only 2.9V, it wonāt be very bright no matter what kind of battery is used. That is an empty battery pushing less voltage than the emitter wants.
According to Texas_Aceās testing, it would max out at less than 230 lumens per emitter at 2.9V, even if the battery was capable of pushing a thousand Amps.
This is the answer iām looking for, thanks a bunch.
Donāt know why i keep saying turbo, itās a habbit i guess. But yeah, i was wondering the emitting capable of the LED at low U and high I
BLF Q8 with NarsilM v1.0 (or v1.2) doesnāt have thermal calibration feature.
Letās say the stock BLF Q8 (or other NarsilM flashlight for that matter) is very wrong (eg. ambient is 25 deg C, but āthermal checkā reads 45 deg C)
Say I flash it to Anduril, then I calibrate the temperature there (25 deg C more or less is 25 deg C)
When I flash the Q8 back to NarsilM (say v1.2), will the thermal sensor (which was previously calibrated when it had Anduril) be back to the earlier wrong reading, or will it become correct (the value configured in Anduril), or just some other random thermal value?