Arrow sells 5000K 90 CRI. They don’t sell it on an MCPCB though. It does work on XP/219 size MCPCBs.
I’m not sure what to suggest other than learning to reflow. It does not take a great deal of skill or special equipment. Here’s a demo of reflow with a lighter. If you’re concerned about breaking stuff, Arrow has cheap LH351Bs and you can test for functionality using a lithium button cell and a couple wires.
—
Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android
If you don’t want it to be yellow, get the LH351D in 5000K.
Even though it’s the lower 80+ CRI?
My problem is that I don’t know anyone selling this led on a mcpcb. I can buy the led from MTN E and the mcpcb from led4power, but I can’t put them together (reflow). Do you know of anyone selling this combo?
If you don’t want it to be yellow, get the LH351D in 5000K.
Even though it’s the lower 80+ CRI?
My problem is that I don’t know anyone selling this led on a mcpcb. I can buy the led from MTN E and the mcpcb from led4power, but I can’t put them together (reflow). Do you know of anyone selling this combo?
Didn’t Mountain do custom reflows?
It’s too much hassle. Maybe in the future MTN will get some 4040 mcpcb and make things simple.
—
Texas Ace Lumen Tube and JoshK Sphere calibrated with Maukka lights
You lot are already talking about modding the thing, that does not yet exist.
Very peculiar. Trust the team involved (well, some of them), and lets see where it goes.
After then might be a time to discuss.
Hum, despite I get your point, and despite trusting the team, I guess we may be talking about modding this before the FW3A is completed/ out for sale/ delivered.
Even this is my specific case, and even if I don’t know how it will look with the XPL or the LH351 emitters, I am sure (well, 95% at least) that I will probably mod it with Luxeon V emitters just because I love how they make the beams look!!
Brainstorming about modding is something that may even help the FW3A Team to get some nice things on the final version of the flashlight, be it UI, look, internals, emitters…
And, again, being a fan of this project despite delays and all the stuff involved, I trust, appreciate and thank the work done and to be done!
Of course people are talking about modding it on BLF, whether it exists yet or not. That’s what we do here.
And given that it’s a FET triple with Carclo 105xx optics, there’s sufficient information to predict the results of most potential mods. I’m sure I’ll be modding more than one of mine because I’m sure I want one with SST-20s, and there will probably be more emitters that interest me.
—
Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android
Also, not to be confused: the interest and discussion about modding this light means that it will be MORE successful as a product, not less so. We don’t want t omake (or buy) a light that is difficult or impossible to mod. Although, we do sometimes get a light made that is close enough to “right” for everyone that few ever do end up modding it. Some still will, and it’s good that they can, and that they want to!
—
The Cycle of Goodness: “No one prospers without rendering benefit to others”
- The YKK Philosophy
I’m thinking about modding at least one of mine too. If I can get some 219B emitters, I think I’ll put those in it. They’re my favorite, and they work really well in a 10511 which has had the frosting polished off.
I’m thinking about modding at least one of mine too. If I can get some 219B emitters, I think I’ll put those in it. They’re my favorite, and they work really well in a 10511 which has had the frosting polished off.
I have a triple 219B here sitting on their CU-PCB.
And I am a bit afraid not to fry them in a FW3A. Do you plan to use a -20% version of Andúril?
I have a triple 219B here sitting on their CU-PCB.
And I am a bit afraid not to fry them in a FW3A. Do you plan to use a -20% version of Andúril?
No, but I would set the ceiling to the highest regulated level, and I doubt I’ll use it above that level much.
The 219B has a higher Vf than 219C, which makes it harder to overdrive. OTOH, it also turns into smoke at a much lower current. But I’ve had FET-based 219B triples before and haven’t had any issues. It’s 219C which really runs into problems on direct drive.
I don’t plan on giving it a hot rod cell either though. Something with more mAh and less current suits my use better.
A silly question maybe, but…how did FW3A end up being less sturdy than Emisar, since they are very roughly the same size? Is it different materials, thinner wall…?
A silly question maybe, but…how did FW3A end up being less sturdy than Emisar, since they are very roughly the same size? Is it different materials, thinner wall…?
A silly question maybe, but…how did FW3A end up being less sturdy than Emisar, since they are very roughly the same size? Is it different materials, thinner wall…?
What you talking about?
Quote:
How does the FW3A compare to the Emisar D4?
FW3A advantages: Slightly smaller, lighter, nicer clip, metal tail switch, higher regulated modes, cheaper (probably), much fancier firmware.
D4 advantages: Sturdier, more emitter/optic/host choices, rubber side switch, higher turbo modes, available from mid-2017, also comes in throwy D1/D1S flavors.
I have a triple 219B here sitting on their CU-PCB.
And I am a bit afraid not to fry them in a FW3A. Do you plan to use a -20% version of Andúril?
No, but I would set the ceiling to the highest regulated level, and I doubt I’ll use it above that level much.
The 219B has a higher Vf than 219C, which makes it harder to overdrive. OTOH, it also turns into smoke at a much lower current. But I’ve had FET-based 219B triples before and haven’t had any issues. It’s 219C which really runs into problems on direct drive.
I don’t plan on giving it a hot rod cell either though. Something with more mAh and less current suits my use better.
The original 219B has a higher Vf but the 219B V1, which is the one sold atm by Clemence and maybe others, has a Vf just as low as the 219C, but indeed without its current handling. http://budgetlightforum.com/node/43751
A silly question maybe, but…how did FW3A end up being less sturdy than Emisar, since they are very roughly the same size? Is it different materials, thinner wall…?
Arrow sells 5000K 90 CRI. They don’t sell it on an MCPCB though. It does work on XP/219 size MCPCBs.
I’m not sure what to suggest other than learning to reflow. It does not take a great deal of skill or special equipment. Here’s a demo of reflow with a lighter. If you’re concerned about breaking stuff, Arrow has cheap LH351Bs and you can test for functionality using a lithium button cell and a couple wires.
Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android
Interesting video zak.wilson, thanks for sharing. .
.
You never know how a horse will pull until you hook him up to a heavy load./"Bear" Bryant
.................................. "Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast" ...................................
Texas Lumens Flashlights / M4D M4X Deals : sign up - save $$$$
Rudeness Level _ mΩ _ {width:70%} _ LightWiki _ LED Tint Chart
Xlamp size chart _ BatteryU _ Flashaholic? Need Professional Help??? TheOriginal _ TAB _ LightSearch _ BatterySearch _ 14500's _ DiCal
Please add me to the list, I’d like 2.
Hello. Im interested in 1 light. Put me in list too. Thanks
Didn’t Mountain do custom reflows?
If not, I may be able to help. PM me.
It’s too much hassle. Maybe in the future MTN will get some 4040 mcpcb and make things simple.
Texas Ace Lumen Tube and JoshK Sphere calibrated with Maukka lights
Click this to go to signature links. I'm still around, just not reading many new threads.
The LH351D is a 3535 emitter.
It is? I wonder why MTN doesn’t offer them on a mcpcb? I might have gotten this led confused with the Luxeon V.
I’ll ask MTN if they sell them on a mcpcb. It might just be a glitch that the website doesn’t show the option.
Texas Ace Lumen Tube and JoshK Sphere calibrated with Maukka lights
Click this to go to signature links. I'm still around, just not reading many new threads.
interested in 1, thanks
They just recently, I believe, started selling them in two flavors:
http://www.mtnelectronics.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=60_134
I think Arrow Electronics also has the 5000K, 90 CRI of both the LH351D and the LH351C.
Please put me on the list.I’d like 2.
This is weird.
You lot are already talking about modding the thing, that does not yet exist.
Very peculiar. Trust the team involved (well, some of them), and lets see where it goes.
After then might be a time to discuss.
Hum, despite I get your point, and despite trusting the team, I guess we may be talking about modding this before the FW3A is completed/ out for sale/ delivered.
Even this is my specific case, and even if I don’t know how it will look with the XPL or the LH351 emitters, I am sure (well, 95% at least) that I will probably mod it with Luxeon V emitters just because I love how they make the beams look!!
Brainstorming about modding is something that may even help the FW3A Team to get some nice things on the final version of the flashlight, be it UI, look, internals, emitters…
And, again, being a fan of this project despite delays and all the stuff involved, I trust, appreciate and thank the work done and to be done!
[REVIEWS] ACEBEAM: H20 / TK16 // AMUTORCH: S3 / S3 vs 219c / AM30 / AX1 / VG10 // BLITZWOLF: BW-ET1 // BRINYTE: T28 / PT18pro / PT28 // DQG: AA Slim Ti // FIREFLIES: ROT66 GEN II // HC-LIGHTS: SS AAA // KLARUS: XT1C // LIVARNOLUX: 314791 // LUMINTOP: Tool AA V2.0 + Tool 25 // NITEFOX: UT20 / ES10K / K3 // ODEPRO: KL52 / B108 // OLIGHT: M2R Warrior / OW Mini // ON THE ROAD: M1 / i3 / M3 Pro / 311 / Z821 / i5 // ROVYVON: A2 + A5R / E300S / A8 / A23 / E200u // SKILHUNT: M150 / M200 // SOFIRN: SF14 + SP10A / SP32A / SP10B // WUBEN: TO10R / E05 / T70 / E10 / TO50R / E19 / E12R / E61 // XTAR: PB2 Charger // Mods: 1 / 2 // TIR: 1 / 2 // Others: Biscotti 3 + 1*7135 / Triple TIR w/ XP-G2 /// My Collection /// My Review’s Blog (PT) /// OL Contest 2019 /// GIVEAWAY: 1 / 2
LOL, modding discussions of lights that do not exist are one of these things that I like about BLF
link to djozz tests
Of course people are talking about modding it on BLF, whether it exists yet or not. That’s what we do here.
And given that it’s a FET triple with Carclo 105xx optics, there’s sufficient information to predict the results of most potential mods. I’m sure I’ll be modding more than one of mine because I’m sure I want one with SST-20s, and there will probably be more emitters that interest me.
Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android
Tom Tom, please stop telling everyone what to do or not. I see it in other threads also.
Thinking and talking about possible future mods is one of the reasons for many to be here.
Also, not to be confused: the interest and discussion about modding this light means that it will be MORE successful as a product, not less so. We don’t want t omake (or buy) a light that is difficult or impossible to mod. Although, we do sometimes get a light made that is close enough to “right” for everyone that few ever do end up modding it. Some still will, and it’s good that they can, and that they want to!
The Cycle of Goodness: “No one prospers without rendering benefit to others”
- The YKK Philosophy
With all of your history with this forum it’s your statement that seems “very peculiar”
Interested, put me down for one please! Can’t pass this up.
I mod my lights before I get them.
Power of the mind
- LEDs & Other Stuff - - UI CheatSheets - - CRX Flashlight Builds - - CRX Stuff for Sale -
I… actually.. wouldn’t doubt this at all.. with you, ya crazy custom build master!
The Cycle of Goodness: “No one prospers without rendering benefit to others”
- The YKK Philosophy
I’m thinking about modding at least one of mine too. If I can get some 219B emitters, I think I’ll put those in it. They’re my favorite, and they work really well in a 10511 which has had the frosting polished off.
I have a triple 219B here sitting on their CU-PCB.
And I am a bit afraid not to fry them in a FW3A. Do you plan to use a -20% version of Andúril?
No, but I would set the ceiling to the highest regulated level, and I doubt I’ll use it above that level much.
The 219B has a higher Vf than 219C, which makes it harder to overdrive. OTOH, it also turns into smoke at a much lower current. But I’ve had FET-based 219B triples before and haven’t had any issues. It’s 219C which really runs into problems on direct drive.
I don’t plan on giving it a hot rod cell either though. Something with more mAh and less current suits my use better.
A silly question maybe, but…how did FW3A end up being less sturdy than Emisar, since they are very roughly the same size? Is it different materials, thinner wall…?
Spread love, it pays off
What you talking about?
Spread love, it pays off
The original 219B has a higher Vf but the 219B V1, which is the one sold atm by Clemence and maybe others, has a Vf just as low as the 219C, but indeed without its current handling.
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/43751
link to djozz tests
I guess it is this:
http://budgetlightforum.com/comment/1236354#comment-1236354
[REVIEWS] ACEBEAM: H20 / TK16 // AMUTORCH: S3 / S3 vs 219c / AM30 / AX1 / VG10 // BLITZWOLF: BW-ET1 // BRINYTE: T28 / PT18pro / PT28 // DQG: AA Slim Ti // FIREFLIES: ROT66 GEN II // HC-LIGHTS: SS AAA // KLARUS: XT1C // LIVARNOLUX: 314791 // LUMINTOP: Tool AA V2.0 + Tool 25 // NITEFOX: UT20 / ES10K / K3 // ODEPRO: KL52 / B108 // OLIGHT: M2R Warrior / OW Mini // ON THE ROAD: M1 / i3 / M3 Pro / 311 / Z821 / i5 // ROVYVON: A2 + A5R / E300S / A8 / A23 / E200u // SKILHUNT: M150 / M200 // SOFIRN: SF14 + SP10A / SP32A / SP10B // WUBEN: TO10R / E05 / T70 / E10 / TO50R / E19 / E12R / E61 // XTAR: PB2 Charger // Mods: 1 / 2 // TIR: 1 / 2 // Others: Biscotti 3 + 1*7135 / Triple TIR w/ XP-G2 /// My Collection /// My Review’s Blog (PT) /// OL Contest 2019 /// GIVEAWAY: 1 / 2
I didn’t see that Finnno. Now you got me wondering too
Pages