It seems that Irredeemable or Fallen both feature very significant investments in the flashlight hobbies, either with time or with money.
But buying a light with battery X doesnât fit the pattern, unless that light is a one-off custom.
So does each instance of the quoted thing get the points? i.e. is this picture worth 237 points? (Theyâre all neutral white and at least 80 CRI) Or perhaps itâs 341 points because all but three have emitter swaps and are therefore arguably âbuilt from partsâ.
It be the same as in TK's original version. That is to say, a milestone can only be reached once - unless a demigod (like TK) decides to make the second occurrence etc another milestone.
Any angst or confusion about that? Whatever TK says.
Itâs good that this flashlight is taking its time, so I have an excuse to save my wallet and stop myself from buying more lights for the moment, as the FW3A will be âbetterâ.
I hope pepinfaxera doesnât get lost in the updates due to the cross conversations
BTW, I guess the âicebergâ idea about flashlights could be make a whole new thread to help us to diagnose how bad is our flashlight health/addiction, adding new âsymptomsâ and âfactsâ :smiling_imp:
Try using a UV torch on Clematis. My standard Montanas look completely different, as do many other flowers. Bees etc. see things quite differently. My Buddleia even still has some blossom despite the winter frosts setting in. If you can find a UV transparent lens, and team it up with a DSLR without an internal filter, it gets very interesting. Orchids particularly.
As well as IR.
It is all âfalseâ colour of course, but everything we see through our eyes is just an illusion, particularly colour. Most other animals donât much bother with colour, preferring detail and movement sensibility. At which they are often far far better than us.