Lexels driver compilation

As said, conduction of heat to flashlight body can sometime be not as good as you imagine because powerful light (which require all those via anyway) likely has a very bright led, which make a lot of heat, so the local temperature near the ring around driver PCB can in some cases be quite warm, and thermal cooling by conduction may not be as good as you imagine. In event of efficient switching circuit on driver (versus linear), it is possible (at high led power) and high air temperature that the driver is cooler than the case.

As you mention, the bulk of copper is in the form of via, not in-plane copper. Adding holes to the in-plane copper significantly reduce in-plane thermal conduction (at the extent of the hole per area ratio). Therefore thermal conduction is not as good as you imagine. Immediate thermal sinking due to increased copper volume will help initially, but once thermal saturation occur, transmission is not as good as you imagine.

Overall I think adding so many via is necessary and not provide much benefit (which is fine), but this come at a cost of significantly longer fabrication time and structural rigidity and board flex (lead to component solder joint breaking), which I think is not a good trade-off to make for robust and strong flashlight.

Thank you for reading!

Seems simple:
For conducting heat more copper is better than less.

It's not simple, there is always an optimum number and size of vias for such designs; with too many vias close to heat source you are creating bottleneck and cutting "heat supply" via top/bottom copper layer for more distant vias, so they become useless.

not simple; ‘more copper’ is not always better, because where the copper is, is important. Many scenario:

- if the goal is to sink heat away from source by a good cooling source like heatsink, radiator etc, then having additional copper mass is not ideal. instead, you need to have lowest thermal resistance away from heatsource. one example is thermal pipe used in cpu, instead of big copper block.

- in the above pcb where so many vias a drilled, then the surface copper is significantly reduced creating poor thermal path in-plane. yes you get better thermal conductivity plane-to-plane in z-axis, but too many via will reduce effectiveness for in-plane conduction.

- as a result, to conduct heat away from source, you can put many via near source to conduct heat from top to bottom plane (or internal if it exist), then you want to then reduce via away from source to maximize in-plane thermal conduction to the heat sink (flashlight body)

- in addition, adding so many via will lead to significant structural integrity tradeoff, which i think is no want for flashlight where the middle of the pcb contact battery

however for fun and to look interesting, this design is ok. i just want to suggest improvement in term of engineering practice. thank you for consideration!

I have to agree in this with clientequator.
Moooore is not always better.

Okay, point taken.
But you still make the fibre glass PCB conduct heat better, ALSO TO THE OUTER PERIMETER, by drilling out the fibre glass and inserting copper vias.
Lexel explained this too.
He even tested it.

there are very reliable things to improve it, but they can easily escalate the price of the board

1. add viases —> at our quantities for free
2. 2oz copper —> relative cheap but needs thicker traces and solder lands
3. 4 layer —> in chineese fabs increase costs quite a bit
4. ceramic PCB replacing fibre glass —> expensive
5. special thermal copper layer like 0.3mm inside the board —> very expensive, needs big batch to be produced

To lexel, do you have these drivers for sale? Do they do 6V 6A output?

Not for sale yet. In previous tests he said it would do 6A output. At lower battery voltages the amp draw from the battery could get as high as 15A-16A IIRC, so it can put out some real power. Of course, the output level can be turned down to what you want. I think it’s a resistor swap to limit output. We just have to be patient.

BTW, I’ve been waiting about a year, so do not hold your breath. Lol

thank you JasonWW. I see Loneoceans also has similar driver, but it seems it is also not for sale yet? Lexel can I build one myself?

Loneoceans only designs, he does not build for sale.

Basicaly I could build them but I got too much to do eith current sales, design and mods to work on them, same with high current buck

To build and sell untested drivers is not really a good idea, they may work in the beginning

Interesting.

Is it possible to build it myself with your pcb and list of parts and program code? Small 6A boost driver is very useful for me. Thank you lexel. It seem some people like you, loneoceans, schoki is making such a driver, but so far i only see loneoceans with working design and flashlight. I am hope to build one myself.

Mtn e is currently making and selling a boost driver, but it is only 17mm and for clicky lights at the moment. Bigger sizes and e-switch versions will be sold soon.

Thank you jasonww! Is it this driver?

I think I may buy one. But I will like to try the 6A version made by lexel since it is much more powerful at 6A compare to 4.2A.

yes a lot depends on the used Bost chip and thermal cooling, on my driver I would strongly suggest to pot around the Boost chip with aluminum oxide glue
you could try the same on MTN driver

Basically whats limiting output current atm is thermal properties of the board

4.2A? That must be due to its small 17mm size (along with the 1.3A 12v output). The bigger ones are 6A just like Lexels (12v also goes up to 2.5A-3A). Roughly 50W seems to be the most you can get from these smallish sized boost drivers.

Lexel, can your 24mm drivers be sanded down to 23mm?
I have the Amutorch VG10 that takes a 23mm driver, and I guess one of yours would be good to fit in, if I can sand it to 23mm! BTW, will it work fine with:
a) Forward Clicky Switch
b) OSRAM KW CSLNM1.TG – 1mm2

Thanks in advance!

BTW, about the driver for the BlitzWolf BW-ET1, I will let it stay still until I get a good solution! Thanks for your answers, though :wink:

Buck driver easily sand down
the FET DD you may be careful with component side as then some are pretty close to the edge like 1mm

for 2S battery configuration a Buck regulated is possible but not yet for 1S