Andúril 2 coming to Sofirn - The general Sofirn development thread

So many people so many ideas about aestetics. It is a tough question that Sofirn asks.

The x1r tube has a shorter thread. In the head of Sofirn it was necessary to insert a copper ring from a wire of about 2 millimeters in diameter.


It’s a good thing djozz, if we didn’t all have various perspectives every man in the world would chase the same woman. :wink:

Edit: It’s really difficult to design a light that doesn’t look like every other light in it’s class. This one, as laid out, is getting close to so many others. The On The Road X5 Pro, for example, is a 26650 light with a decent sized head to it…

So I think the thing to do may be to look at the competition, steer clear of what’s already been done, come up with something unique to catch people’s eye. Like the X5 Pro used a mechanical clicky in the normal e-switch position. Neat, don’t see that… so put in due diligence and find the path to your own greatness Sofirn, it will serve you well if you do so. :wink:

Oh yeah, when I saw that animated exploded view of the X5 Pro, I knew I had to have one! And have one I do! :smiley:

I don’t like the style too.

it’s very diffcult to design one without looking like any other brands. We are trying to design a unique looking for Sofirn. It’s really hard, most every style has been tried. I think all we can do is do some small design on some existed design.

Tailfins.

Probably the best you can hope for is a design that does not look ugly.
Mediocre or average looking is just fine by me.
It’s probably more important that it fit the hand well with no odd shapes or pointy bits. Make the button easy to find in the dark, etc… If people think it looks pretty, that’s a bonus.

I’m a flashlight user, not a collector. A collector might have a completely different point of view.

I agree Jason. Unless a light is just flat out dog ugly…. I much prefer function over form.
Sure… make it as appealing to the eye as possible, but the main thing is how it functions. Get that right & it’ll be a winner. :+1:

I think most potential customers won’t mind if it is similar in appearance to other lights, especially popular styles like the ubiquitous C8 style or the Eagle Eye X6. But, you can take a style like that and make some small change, (hopefully improvement) and make it your own.

Maybe take a classic that hasn’t yet been updated to a 21700 size, and do that, and maybe add one or two very small aesthetic changes, and you will have a totally new light that’s never been done before!

Another possibility is take two different designs that have had some amount of popularity, and merge them somehow, taking some design elements from each of the ‘parents’ to make a nice looking new light.

Here’s another that will be a sure winner: Look at lights that have been popular over the years, but for some reason were discontinued while still fairly desirable. I’m not talking about lights that buyers got tired of, and caused sales to wane. I mean lights that people still liked, but the manufacturers decided to move on and drop them. Resurrect an old design, update it with new internals, and maybe make very small changes to the outside to make it your own design.

One thing a lot of people might never think about: look at lights that are ‘too cheap’ but are otherwise a decent design. There are lots of lights that never become truly popular only because of how badly they are made. I’ve seen reviews here on BLF of lights that looked good, but were found to lack inner quality. Those lights most people wouldn’t know about, because nobody wants to buy them. But, if they were made well, the design might be irresistible! You can take the design, improve the quality, and release a unique product that people will love. If you just look through the massive collections on sites like Banggood, Gearbest, AliExpress, and Amazon, you can find plenty of these.

Last idea from me: Read reviews - lots of them! Find out what people like and what they don’t like about the lights we already have available to us. Take those ideas and make a new light that improves upon those existing designs based on that ‘feedback’ in the reviews. Read through the comments below the reviews too. Even the audience has some insightful things to say at times. :wink:

I have many chargers but I still like having USB charging. Especially with Type C. And even more so when this acts as a powebank.
Why?
Because I’m backpacking - extra charger is a needles bulk to carry around. But then….that’s why I have not bought any Sofirn light yet.
They tend to be large and heavy, totally not my style.

I like the 2*18650 side by side format (like Fenix TK35, Nitecore SRT9 etc). I would like to see a Sofirn light use this format with a reflector the size of C8 reflector or smaller, NarsilM / Anduril and two independent switches (side electronic switch = NarsilM / Anduril as we know it, recessed back electronic switch for only momentary on turbo, not on/off). Use a XHP35 or an SST-20 for a thrower version (and ~2k lumens turbo) and a XHP70.2 for a flooder version (and ~3.5k lumens turbo).

I’d also like a 1*18650 tube flashlight with deep carry clip and the UI I described above with the two switches (side = NarsilM/ Anduril, back = momentary turbo only). In that case, the sidebutton should be recessed so it won’t be activated in pocket, ever. Also, electronic lockout should only affect the side switch, momentary turbo should always work as long as it isn’t locked out by unscrewing the switch cap.

18650 or 21700 or 26650 flashlight which uses two different emitters for different cases (like Rofis MR70).

Talking about nice designs that are discontinued (as David suggested), have a look at the Lucky Sun flashlights. They had a good body quality and distinct aestetics that was appreciated by many, but their drivers and performance was mediocre.

I would love to see a LuckySun D80 style flashlight coming back, and think that the LuckySun F3X looks much better than the Sofirn C8F triples, it has much better finning too.

I heard a lot off: 5000K is green in low modes.
Is it better now?

The aesthetic comments are similar to those who prefer throw vs flood. It seems as if you need two versions of every body style light.

I have almost no use for throw. I thought the new light looks interesting but I think it is hard to imagine how such a thing would feel in your hand. I would like to see the crenelations on the bezel be deeper. Maybe 3mm minimum so if the light is on and head standing, more light is able to escape.

On the other hand, I need to look into this “x5 pro”.

it seems more and more brands sell battery with charging port, then the flashlight with battery called rechargeable light.

What are advantages and disadvantages of this battery?

How do you guys think about it?

The advantage of this battery is that you can use it in multiple lights, and you can still charge it via USB.

However, the disadvantages are:

  1. You can’t swap the battery on the fly. You will need to wait and charge the battery via USB, which can be very useful.
  2. It will be a bit more expensive than no-recharge port batteries.
  3. The battery will be bigger, which some lights may not fit.
  4. The battery will be limited in performance. In lights like the C8F, Sofirn SP36, and BLF Q8, and even Sofirn SP32A V2, it will be limiting the amount of power you can drain.
  5. You lose a bit of capacity.
  6. Like all protected batteries, you lose capacity more quickly. Therefore, it can’t be stored for as long.

I think USB chargers in lights is a good idea. I don’t need it, but it can be convenient. But USB charger built into the battery? No thanks! I want the battery to be completely uninhibited! Nothing added to it except maybe a good quality button top.

I would much rather have a USB Charging port in a battery than a light. That way those who want USB Charging can have it and the manufacture does not have to put a USB port in the flashlight.

So it seems a great way to ’not’ have to make an unnessary hole in a light for a USB port…. a win - win for everyone!! . :+1: . :wink:

  • Cost of light can be kept down not having to add a USB port
  • Those who want USB charging can buy a battery with a USB port

Like I said… win - win for everyone.

It’s not a win win.

If they support those garbage batteries they have to make all their flashlights longer with poor quality springs.

Well stated, teacher.