Sofirn SF13 2×AA - First Impressions

45 posts / 0 new
Last post
LEDlove
LEDlove's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/25/2018 - 15:37
Posts: 36
peg matite wrote:
Looks a good bit like the Zanflare F2.

I don’t think it’s all that much brighter either. I got mine last Saturday and have been doing some more comparisons at different distances and in different environments and I don’t think it’s as bright as they say. When I compare my 130 lumen energizer to the Sofirn SF13 in turbo mode, it’s about twice as bright, which would put it at 260 or maybe 280 lumens. Even if it was 320 lumens, it’s still 100 lumens lower than what the unit I have is advertised as. I think I either got the older version, or the 420 lumen figure is based on using 14500 cells instead of AA, even though they specify AA.

Serlite
Online
Last seen: 4 min 28 sec ago
Joined: 11/01/2018 - 16:14
Posts: 121
LEDlove wrote:
peg matite wrote:
Looks a good bit like the Zanflare F2.

I don’t think it’s all that much brighter either. I got mine last Saturday and have been doing some more comparisons at different distances and in different environments and I don’t think it’s as bright as they say. When I compare my 130 lumen energizer to the Sofirn SF13 in turbo mode, it’s about twice as bright, which would put it at 260 or maybe 280 lumens. Even if it was 320 lumens, it’s still 100 lumens lower than what the unit I have is advertised as. I think I either got the older version, or the 420 lumen figure is based on using 14500 cells instead of AA, even though they specify AA.

I know I’ve read somewhere around these forums that perceived brightness doesn’t correspond consistently with actual lumen output. Stuff like how a light that’s technically twice as bright as another only appears 1.5x as bright, or something like that. So it could actually be outputting closer to 420lm, but only appearing twice as bright as 130lm rather than three times as bright.

SIGShooter
SIGShooter's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 29 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2013 - 02:10
Posts: 1791
Location: northern california
LEDlove wrote:
peg matite wrote:
Looks a good bit like the Zanflare F2.

I don’t think it’s all that much brighter either. I got mine last Saturday and have been doing some more comparisons at different distances and in different environments and I don’t think it’s as bright as they say. When I compare my 130 lumen energizer to the Sofirn SF13 in turbo mode, it’s about twice as bright, which would put it at 260 or maybe 280 lumens. Even if it was 320 lumens, it’s still 100 lumens lower than what the unit I have is advertised as. I think I either got the older version, or the 420 lumen figure is based on using 14500 cells instead of AA, even though they specify AA.


Using 14500’s in the SF13 will likely result in magic smoke since the driver is rated at 1.6 to 3.2v. Even a single 14500 with a dummy cell will be over the rated voltage so I highly doubt they used 14500’s in their rating.

9mm/40cal/45cal bullets and large/small pistol primers available for sale in San Francisco Bay area

LEDlove
LEDlove's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/25/2018 - 15:37
Posts: 36
Serlite wrote:
LEDlove wrote:
peg matite wrote:
Looks a good bit like the Zanflare F2.

I don’t think it’s all that much brighter either. I got mine last Saturday and have been doing some more comparisons at different distances and in different environments and I don’t think it’s as bright as they say. When I compare my 130 lumen energizer to the Sofirn SF13 in turbo mode, it’s about twice as bright, which would put it at 260 or maybe 280 lumens. Even if it was 320 lumens, it’s still 100 lumens lower than what the unit I have is advertised as. I think I either got the older version, or the 420 lumen figure is based on using 14500 cells instead of AA, even though they specify AA.

I know I’ve read somewhere around these forums that perceived brightness doesn’t correspond consistently with actual lumen output. Stuff like how a light that’s technically twice as bright as another only appears 1.5x as bright, or something like that. So it could actually be outputting closer to 420lm, but only appearing twice as bright as 130lm rather than three times as bright.

You could be right.

LEDlove
LEDlove's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/25/2018 - 15:37
Posts: 36
SIGShooter wrote:
LEDlove wrote:
peg matite wrote:
Looks a good bit like the Zanflare F2.

I don’t think it’s all that much brighter either. I got mine last Saturday and have been doing some more comparisons at different distances and in different environments and I don’t think it’s as bright as they say. When I compare my 130 lumen energizer to the Sofirn SF13 in turbo mode, it’s about twice as bright, which would put it at 260 or maybe 280 lumens. Even if it was 320 lumens, it’s still 100 lumens lower than what the unit I have is advertised as. I think I either got the older version, or the 420 lumen figure is based on using 14500 cells instead of AA, even though they specify AA.


Using 14500’s in the SF13 will likely result in magic smoke since the driver is rated at 1.6 to 3.2v. Even a single 14500 with a dummy cell will be over the rated voltage so I highly doubt they used 14500’s in their rating.

I guess I won’t be trying that then. I’m using 1.2V NiMH batteries instead of 1.5V alkalines. I haven’t tried alkalines yet, but maybe I should do it to compare if they’re a bit brighter due to the 2 alkalines having a combined increase of .6 volts over the NiMH.

BlueSwordM
BlueSwordM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 20 hours 2 min ago
Joined: 11/29/2017 - 12:34
Posts: 5459
Location: Canada

They won’t be brighter, at all.

See, alkalines have very high internal resistance.

That means for anything over 50-100mA, they lose a ton of capacity and a lot of power.

Also, their discharge is more of a linear curve, as they fall very quickly down from 1,5V, while NiMH stays at 1,2V average voltage for the entirety of the discharge.

TLDR: LSD NiMH cells crush everything alkaline does, even matching it in long term self-discharge.

My very own high current Beryllium Copper springs Gen 3:
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/67401
Liitokala Aliexpress Stores Battery Fraud: http://budgetlightforum.com/node/60547

LEDlove
LEDlove's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/25/2018 - 15:37
Posts: 36

BlueSwordM wrote:
They won’t be brighter, at all.

See, alkalines have very high internal resistance.

That means for anything over 50-100mA, they lose a ton of capacity and a lot of power.

Also, their discharge is more of a linear curve, as they fall very quickly down from 1,5V, while NiMH stays at 1,2V average voltage for the entirety of the discharge.

TLDR: LSD NiMH cells crush everything alkaline does, even matching it in long term self-discharge.

This explains why my digital camera actually works with NiMH batteries while alkalines won’t work for more than a couple minutes after putting fresh ones in the camera. The alkalines still test as very good, but my camera sees them as dead.

LEDlove
LEDlove's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/25/2018 - 15:37
Posts: 36

Phlogiston:
Could you please tell me how to turn the light on in low mode? The instructions say that “fast clicking” it on from when its off activates memory mode and turns it on in the last mode it was in. But for me, it comes on in the last mode it was in no matter how slowly I turn it on. Sometimes I want it to come on in low mode, but comes on in turbo if that’s what I last used.

Jackie
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 3 days ago
Joined: 10/12/2017 - 23:20
Posts: 101
Location: Shenzhen

good small light, i bought one last month, and it update to 420lm already

Hellie112
Hellie112's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 16 min ago
Joined: 05/18/2013 - 08:48
Posts: 100
Location: The Netherlands
Hellie112 wrote:
The second unit I received had more glue inside and was a lot harder to open.

Just received two SF13 “420 lm version” (ordered during the spring sale for giving away to friends). And I can report that the bezels on these two units aren’t glued.

SKV89
Offline
Last seen: 35 min 11 sec ago
Joined: 12/10/2017 - 12:46
Posts: 3249
Location: US

Bezels arent glued. I modded three of them last week with e21A 9080 and Optisolis. Works well except I dont like the UI as much as the SF14

Phlogiston
Phlogiston's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 41 min ago
Joined: 10/27/2016 - 16:57
Posts: 890
Location: Scotland
LEDlove wrote:
Phlogiston: Could you please tell me how to turn the light on in low mode? The instructions say that “fast clicking” it on from when its off activates memory mode and turns it on in the last mode it was in. But for me, it comes on in the last mode it was in no matter how slowly I turn it on. Sometimes I want it to come on in low mode, but comes on in turbo if that’s what I last used.

As far as I know, there’s no short cut to low. The light always uses mode memory.

The manual’s not very good, shall we say. Just as an example, the German part of my manual actually refers to a completely different light!

iamlucky13
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 20 min ago
Joined: 06/22/2018 - 09:18
Posts: 619
Location: USA
SKV89 wrote:
Bezels arent glued. I modded three of them last week with e21A 9080 and Optisolis. Works well except I dont like the UI as much as the SF14

Which PCB are you using for those mods? Is that for both the SF13 and SF14?

What are you using for an optic/reflector, and does it work reasonably well with the Optisolis?

If you’ve come up with a good combo, this seems like a cost-effective way to get rare emitters into practical lights.

SKV89
Offline
Last seen: 35 min 11 sec ago
Joined: 12/10/2017 - 12:46
Posts: 3249
Location: US

16mm vr16 mcpcb from virence.com. I buy them presoldered. It fits the sf13 and sf14 v1 but does not fit the sf14 v2 because they decreased the mcpcb to I think 15 or 14 cm. Too bad the sf14 v1 not available anymore.

Pages