Emisar D18 introduction

This light is incredible. I had absolutely no plans to spend $100 on a flashlight, with the FW3A coming (hopefully) soon, but those plans may have to change.

Already got a quote from arrow:

Thank you for your interest in Arrow.com. Below is the quote you requested on 3/14/2019.
PART Lead Time(Wks) QTY PRICE TOTAL
sphwhtl3da0ef4t0t6
Samsung Electronics 6 6400 $0.8154 $5,218.56
SUBTOTAL: $5218.56

at $ 0.80 they are almost the same price as the SST-20 in the same qty….arrow even has free worldwide shipping doesnt it?

Now - I don’t expect for Hank to even want to order enough for a 1000pcs of 18 emitter lights….Look at the stock numbers on his site. He has around 50 of Emisar D4 ,150 of D4S and 60 of Noctigon M43 in stock….of ALL emitter types……You could build 300 Emisar D18 lights and have a 1000 leds left over to make additional D4 and D4S Emisars! :slight_smile:

I just think this is a case of where it may really be worth it….Dale used the W6 bin LH351D on his fireflies and is well over 10000 lumens - a massive gain….so i get it - its not for every situation, but for raw power - its your huckleberry.

LH351D is brighter than SST20. It produces more lumens.

However, my personal experience is the SST20 looks a lot more impressive. Especially in lights like this with tiny optics. This is because the hotspot is much, MUCH more intense with SST20, even if it isn’t as wide.

Best would XPL HI which throws like SST20 while producing lumens like LH351D, and can do so with excellent tint below the black body line. However, I can see why XPL HI would not be a common option in this light, especially if it would double the cost of the light to nearly $200.

I think an extra XP-L would be around $ 40. Acceptable for me.

Actually, checking International Outdoors website, to get XPL HI emitters the extra cost is about $10.

Based on that, and increasing from 4 to 18 emitters, I would expect the extra cost to purchase a D18 with XPL HI should be $35.

That’s not bad. If the base price of the light is $90, then with XPL HI it would be $125. At that price, I probably would order XPL HI.

Exactly, $ 125 from XP-L HI and I go into it.

Just got the

[quote back from Arrow]
(https://i.imgur.com/4WSBkgS.jpg) a few minutes ago. The caveat is “pricing and lead times are subject to change based on the factory/supplier conditions” . In other words, no firm time frame. Couple that with Zebralight’s message.

But I agree, if he could get them, spreading them across the other models would be great.

+1. Would be gorgous. :slight_smile:

If I point it down and let go, will it hover?

:student:

My experience with the XP-L HI wasn’t that great. It showed significantly more abrupt CCT shift in the beam then either my 219C or SST-20. The color temperature was also about out of spec. to. I had a 2700K model, and it’s actual CCT was over 3000K. The yellowish rings in the beam were in the upper 2900K range.

The SST-20 delivers its promised CCT better then the XP-L, and it has far less chroma shift about beam to.

Nice light. Willl definitely buy one… emisar lights are defect free based on my previous order.

Why not use 3 x 20700 ? 14000 lumen will drain the battery quickly.

This is how the 3*18350 tube look in the 3D file, short and thick, what do you guys think?

yes short and thicc is what i like

Ok that looks stupid…

Stupid cute.

For a few bucks more….sure.
It’s a showoff toy…

The 18350 proportions look off to me. Functionality wise, if you are carrying such a big light, may as well use 18650’s and have a good grip on the light.

On the other hand, I suspect alot of people would want to buy the shorter tube for a few dollars extra as a secondary option. I would be curious even for myself! Could make a cool table top lantern. That would actually be a good accessory for it, a lantern diffuser made to fit.

:slight_smile:

I agree with both sentiments. Would love to see a 3x21700 tube. With three Samsung 40T cells, we would have max lumens and great run times.

If the D18 requires unprotected button top cells like the Meteor, that might explain why Hank didn’t go this route. 21700s are only flat top I think.

I’m a fan of 18350 but think that tube is impractical and ridiculous. That being said…if it’s offered I’m probably buying one.

3 x 21700 are about the same diameter as 4 x 18650 and only have a tiny advantage over 4 x 18650. Hank wanted to keep the light small.

It does require at least raised flat tops. It should have a ring on the driver like the Meteor and Q8 (based on the battery tube spring board). There are a few raised flat top 21700 on the market, but not too many. There’s even less button top 21700 currently on the market so 18650 does make the most sense.