You dated AOC? :person_facepalming:
Yes images should fit the page.
You can just hover over thumbnails and links with this greasemonkey script
The C01 is looking wellworn :+1:
For the Advanced Post Editor crowd the fit to width option is not available, but of course it is easy to use a standard maximum moderate width. I usually select around 640 pixels, maybe a little bit more. 540 pixels ensures an always fit in my experience.
I believe one can always use the Simple Post Editor to insert the image with the size limit set, then switch to the Advance Post Editor. Doing that will result in the need to edit what has been typed already as some formatting is removed with the change.
You can set image size in the advanced editor too, but in a bit weird way: instead of setting width to a certain amount of pixels, instead fill in a percentage in the width field, i.e ā70%ā , then empty the height field.
Good to know. 
Yes! Very nice, djozz.
I rarely notice long load times, but layout-breaking pics are a thing. Use max-width.
So if I upload a large pic to imgur and copy and paste the link in blf using the insert image option then click on relative width and set to 50% does blf have to resize the image ever time itās viewed and the page loads slow?
This is how I do it to make sure the image doesnāt take up the whole page. If itās slowing down browsing for some members Iāll resize the image in imgur first before linking.
I vote yes, so whereās my free beer?
Most people wonāt because their DSL, cable, whatever is fast enough. But when on cell data those big files gobble data unnecessarily. Sometimes when I can see the images āpaintedā line by line I could scream.
The beer is free. $14.99 prepaid for shipping and handling. 
ā¦ā¦ 
I donāt know about others, the issue I have is the size in the thread. What set this off was a seller posted these enormous pictures that I kept scrolling and scrollingā¦.then hit these tiny posts.
If people put ā100ā then itās post width and that should be fine. For meā¦but others may have data and speed issues on their phones.
I knew there was a catch regarding the free beerā¹ļø
So, when using that relative width dialog, youāll get something like:
!https://i.imgur.com/3rZNm2r.jpg!:https://i.imgur.com/3rZNm2r.jpg
But if you just want to make sure it doesnāt break the layout, change it to:
!{max-width: 100%}https://i.imgur.com/3rZNm2r.jpg!:https://i.imgur.com/3rZNm2r.jpg
Yup.
Iām no programmer but it appears that 100% represents 100% of the normal post box width. Big or small.
Here is an example of a pic that is very small but is full post box widthā¦.13.8 kb.
Same size imageā¦.different percentages.
100%
50%
25%
5%
The important distinction is that max-width wonāt stretch the image if the screen is large, while width will.
Iām not sure what you are saying.
See my example above. Choosing the width controls how much of the posting box it fills, no matter what the actual picture size.
It's a shame max-width doesn't seem to be an option if you're using the Advanced Post Editor.
It does, or so djozz said. See the below example at 
a 200% 103% O:) width:
^:)
Edited: reduced the 200% annoyance to 103%. Setting it ridiculously high causes havoc you must know. :-D
Sat, 03/23/2019 - 11:08; Sat, 03/23/2019 - 18:00
So for the āany sizeā people I should PM them a 335MP 296MB image? (34,485x9741 pixels)
The above is the full sized version of thisā¦
DBā¦I have a spectacular view like this from my inherited house in the old country. Too bad the house is over a century old and hardly anybody lives in the village.
In factā¦ā¦where is the picture from?