I wouldn’t have bought this light if it had USB charging. The Astrolux is ugly and bulky looking but if someone wants charging they have that as an option.
I’m not against it on all lights. The Astrolux FT03 I got isn’t so bad with USB charging but the light is already big so it adds no size overall. It’s also a light I could see myself leaving a battery in and not wanting a higher or lower drain/capacity battery for some period of time. Still, even in this light, I feel it’s very waterproof and flush but my finger catches the tag edge of the stupid silicone cover every time i grab the light.
Here’s a thought…… Instead of ’dumbing down’ a Li Ion light so you can
“give it to a muggle”, e-d-u-c-a-t-e them on the safe use of Li Ion lights. Or, as DB Custom said; “let them remain muggles”.
Give them a AA light. Not everyone should have or own a Li Ion light.
To dumb down a good light with USB charging (or others bells & whistles) so as to muggle or idiot proof it is ridiculous in my opinion.
It would be somewhat like limiting every 4 wheel vehicle on the roads to 89 horsepower so they would be safer for everyone to drive.
R-i-d-i-c-u-l-o-u-s. :person_facepalming: :person_facepalming: :person_facepalming: <— Yep, a triple face palm.
Either educate or do not gift Li Ion…. simple as that.
And for ‘flashaholics’ who actually desire USB charging on a high power Li Ion light…… I personally am at a loss for words. :person_facepalming: . :innocent:
Well it was on the official website on the banner for a while E07 IV, it is supposed to be somewhat refined manufacturing, but no usb charging as far as I know…
I do not understand the big resistance against usb charging, it seem to work perfect on those devices that have it. that usb charge circuit board cant add much space, if the people who talk loud about it please post how big it is and and then give us an argument that its not work to add a non-noticeable size difference.
If my Manker E14 II which is super small and power can have have usb charging then I think E07 have no problem to have it. Same with Acebeam EC65 it works perfect. One of the biggest benefit is that I can charge the flashlight in the car.
I think there is benefits in safety too, cause many people will buy from china dangerous charges and maybe counterfeit, to have a built in charger would mean people don’t need to risk to buy a dangeorus charger, also if it becomes a explosion I rather have tha battery inside the tube then open in the air, it will for sure reduce the damage.
Also economically it will be cheaper. E07 does not come bundle with a charger, 55 dollars is good price but if you have to buy a charger too including shipping etc you will end up paying more money.
Its a lot easier to just put in a cable rather then having the to unscrew the tube and put batteries in the charger. I think what ever people think usb charging is the future for many reasons. I can understand that many flashoholics dislike it cause they have their super good chargers with LCD displays that of course is better then a built in one but I think the need for external charger will get smaller and smaller… as usb charging become standard.
THIS IS A TEST OF THE EMERGENCY OFF-TOPIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM.
THIS IS ONLY A TEST.
WE NOW RETURN YOU TO OUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED O.P.-TOPIC PROGRAM ALREADY IN PROGRESS…
The reason I loke usb charging is not only because it is muggle friendly but convenient to bring on trips so I dont have to bring a separate charger. Im travelling in Europe right now and decided not to bring the E07 because it has no usb charge.
The EC65 is the smallest 21700 light I own and I have many 21700 lights. The EC65 is very refined with usb c charge. Therefore I dont understand why everyone thinks usb chargeq makes the light so much bigger.
Yeah…and aside from having charging it actually supports 21750 cells which gives it a 5mm disadvantage over some competitors.
But sometimes it does add size. Smaller lights…Ones that desire it on a separate PCB (to make changing the main driver)…Extremely compact lights (FW3A)…
People make a huge stink over the safety of lithium ion batteries and built-in chargers but I bet most people here carry a Li-ion-powered smartphone in their pocket every day and plug it into different chargers throughout the day. It all comes down to the quality of components used.
The reasons I’m not fond of USB charging in a flashlight are because it usually adds size and usually compromises the waterproofing. But even that’s not always true. Everybody is familiar with the relatively new to the market 10180 flashlights, like the Maratac Peanut or the Olight i1r, for example. Those have built-in USB charging and if the charging functionality adds size, the flashlights still end up being some of the smallest 130 lumen lights on the market. Also, the way that USB charging is implemented can be perfectly waterproof, too. The Acebeam H30 headlamp, as another example, hides the charging port under the threads at one end, which is sealed up with an o-ring. If you never charge it via USB, you never have to unscrew that cap.
I see both sides of the USB argument, but I call BS on the issue of the E07 not being big enough, or USB charging adding to its size. The smallest flashlight that I own is the Helius Sigma vi, and they managed to include USB charging on it.
Yes, in my eyes it invalidates what you said. Becuase that Peanut Rev 2 is 29% larger than Fairy. This is a huge difference and at least for me it clearly puts it in another size class.
BTW that Helius Sigma Li that G.P. has shown is even larger than that.
My point is: when a light is small, there is a big size increase caused by adding a charger.
At larger sizes, the minimal increase is pretty much meaningless - but some makers choose to have a separate charger board (and some BLFers advocate that for the sake of easier driver replacement). Such construction is advantageous for modders but it add some size to larger lights as well. At larger sizes users often request Type-C. Which is another small size increase.
