I wish you guys would stop comparing this thing to a Q8. This was supposed to be compared to a Convoy L6, and supposed to out throw it with the larger head.
I feel like we’re comparing apples to oranges which makes me wonder about the design of the reflector.
That should not be the case. A bigger reflector with the same size emitter means a slightly smaller hot spot. Maybe you are referring to the corona? If your looking at it through a camera you have to use very low output levels to see the true hot spot size.
EDIT, are you comparing it to the new L6 that has the SMO reflector? That model might have a slightly smaller hotspot.
Definitely a larger hotspot,tried it on internal wall at 2 meters ,external wall at 10 meters and at bush across the park approx 150 meters.A rough guess about 20% larger.Sorry can’t post pics as I don’t use hosting sites.
Edit, old L6 unmodded with OP reflector.
I’m not sure about that. A noticably bigger hot spot would mean much lower throw numbers, but our throw numbers are still high. I guess we’ll find out later.
You have a high powered L6 with an SMO reflector, right?
You know it can only hit about 172kcd, right?
Why would you expect 300kcd by going from a 63mm SMO reflector to a 73mm(?) OP reflector? I would not expect that big of a jump. Am I not understanding how significant a small bump in reflector diameter can be?
If the hot spot was visably larger than an L6 like gehrmo said (20%) it would indicate a much wider beam angle. You would then expect probably under 100kcd. Maybe under 60kcd. We are not seeing those crazy low numbers.
We are not seeing perfectly optimized numbers either because we know the reflector depth as a bit short for the diameter.
I would much rather wait till I can compare the lights side by side and take measurements. I prefer that to speculating.