I see two different ones available in the jungle store. When open, one is roughly square with two panels, and one is rectangular with three smaller panels. One of the rectangular ones is only $16, while the other ones are $30. Which style or 10W panel do you have? (DBSAR and goshdogit)
Do not get the clone with square panels! - I have the real Eceen 10-watt folding panel,)(that has the cut corners of the cells) This one, but its from the Amazon.ca Canadian site, its available form the Amazon.com US site too. >> Amazon.ca
I have the same ECEEN 10 Watt model that Den has in his video, but mine is black and his is camouflage. They fold in half and close with a zipper around three sides and look like this:
I got mine on ‘the auction site’ for $14 late last summer. It think it may have been a pricing error.
Den and I discussed this ECEEN panel a while back, and I linked to a couple of review videos I found. One of them discusses the ‘automatic reset’ function that Den mentioned.
Yes, it works. The HQ ProgKey Universal adapter is what I’m using. It works with any layout which has the pads spaced at the right distance, as long as it’s 4x2 or smaller. Admittedly, that’s still pretty specific… but it’s universal as far as my current set of drivers go. I have a few different drivers with different pad layouts.
Either one should work though. I just went with this one because it’s smaller, cheaper, slightly more flexible, and easier to reconfigure.
thanks DBSAR and goshdogit. The picture and links are very helpful. Both panels I described are listed as sold by ECEEN, but as I look closer now the less expensive model has only 3 panels, not four. Both have the cut corners, but the 3 panel one definitely looks different. It is marketed as “Waterproof” which may be why it looks different. Regardless its unlikely they can get the same power (10W) out of both the 3 and 4 panel version. I’ll be picking up the one you recommend.
Here are the additions since 5/12. If you haven’t already done so don’t forget to check that your BLF user name is correct on one of the spreadsheets linked in post #1.