FW3A, a TLF/BLF EDC flashlight - SST-20 available, coupon codes public

13170 posts / 0 new
Last post
justanotherguy
Offline
Last seen: 40 min 24 sec ago
Joined: 11/26/2012 - 22:11
Posts: 632
Location: ILLinois

Neal wrote:
I will talk with lumintop tomorrow morning, and will ask them if they can do something to fix this.

Give me some time now.

nice
I was going to get a copper 3D …kinda bummed about buying a carlco and glass lens separately

anyone in NE ILLinois into get togethers?

Dr.Tautology
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 5 days ago
Joined: 06/17/2018 - 20:35
Posts: 8
Location: United States

Same here. Neal’s website still states that it has a glass lens with carclo optic. So guess what? If you get anything other than that, dispute charges.

Geuzzz
Geuzzz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 21 min 13 sec ago
Joined: 10/25/2015 - 10:27
Posts: 1035
Location: Netherlands
zak.wilson wrote:
Geuzzz wrote:
I like the original setup better also, but this is what a good manufacturer should do with their products.

There are two related and sometimes competing things manufacturers do along these lines:

  • Value engineering – looking for opportunities to reduce production cost. These may or may not have a customer-visible impact on the product. It must be done very carefully if it will.
  • Continuous quality improvement – looking for opportunities to make the product work better, like replacing the non-rustproof screws on the otherwise rustproof knife with rustproof ones.

In this case, Lumintop has made a value engineering change by replacing a part that was explicitly specified by make and model with something else with different performance characteristics. They did this without approval from their customer (Neal). I don’t know anything about Chinese law, but in the US, Neal could sue them.

I do think Neal should be contacting customers with pending orders directly to offer them the opportunity to cancel at a minimum. The option of a free 10511 optic and lens installed by Neal prior to shipping would be better. That would cost Neal money of course, and he should demand that Lumintop cover his costs.

Or you can consider it continuous improvement, lean even. If this was necessary to keep up with demands and have a good supplier of this essential part.

I understand that you should never piss off your customer, but it says nowhere in the lumintop specs that you should get a carclo optic.

Bob_McBob
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 51 min ago
Joined: 08/14/2016 - 04:53
Posts: 491
Location: Canada
Geuzzz wrote:
I understand that you should never piss off your customer, but it says nowhere in the lumintop specs that you should get a carclo optic.

That’s because they changed it in the last couple days. The colour of the clip in the product photos has also been altered.

Geuzzz
Geuzzz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 21 min 13 sec ago
Joined: 10/25/2015 - 10:27
Posts: 1035
Location: Netherlands
Bob_McBob wrote:
Geuzzz wrote:
I understand that you should never piss off your customer, but it says nowhere in the lumintop specs that you should get a carclo optic.

That’s because they changed it in the last couple days. The colour of the clip in the product photos has also been altered.

!https://i.imgur.com/lK8WhKX.gif!

Well that is indeed misleading.

BlueSwordM
BlueSwordM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 30 min ago
Joined: 11/29/2017 - 12:34
Posts: 4972
Location: Canada

Wait, did I just see that they removed the glass lens?!

Ok what? How is that a good design decision?

The optic will get scratched that way…

My very own high current Beryllium Copper springs Gen 3:
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/67401
Liitokala Aliexpress Stores Battery Fraud: http://budgetlightforum.com/node/60547

jasontheguitarist
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 02/25/2019 - 11:45
Posts: 139
Geuzzz wrote:
zak.wilson wrote:
Geuzzz wrote:
I like the original setup better also, but this is what a good manufacturer should do with their products.

There are two related and sometimes competing things manufacturers do along these lines:

  • Value engineering – looking for opportunities to reduce production cost. These may or may not have a customer-visible impact on the product. It must be done very carefully if it will.
  • Continuous quality improvement – looking for opportunities to make the product work better, like replacing the non-rustproof screws on the otherwise rustproof knife with rustproof ones.

In this case, Lumintop has made a value engineering change by replacing a part that was explicitly specified by make and model with something else with different performance characteristics. They did this without approval from their customer (Neal). I don’t know anything about Chinese law, but in the US, Neal could sue them.

I do think Neal should be contacting customers with pending orders directly to offer them the opportunity to cancel at a minimum. The option of a free 10511 optic and lens installed by Neal prior to shipping would be better. That would cost Neal money of course, and he should demand that Lumintop cover his costs.

Or you can consider it continuous improvement, lean even. If this was necessary to keep up with demands and have a good supplier of this essential part.

I understand that you should never piss off your customer, but it says nowhere in the lumintop specs that you should get a carclo optic.

Lumintop does say “standard TIR optic” This all in one plastic thing they have created isn’t “standard”

To me, in a technology context, standard implies it’s an easily attained part that can be swapped out. A proprietary part created specifically for this flashlight isn’t “standard” at all.

justanotherguy
Offline
Last seen: 40 min 24 sec ago
Joined: 11/26/2012 - 22:11
Posts: 632
Location: ILLinois

well i have the copper 3D in my cart…not sure I will pull the trigger if it doesnt come carlco/glass

anyone in NE ILLinois into get togethers?

BlueSwordM
BlueSwordM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 30 min ago
Joined: 11/29/2017 - 12:34
Posts: 4972
Location: Canada

Yeah.

The change in optic can be understood, but completely removing the lens?

I should’ve just ordered the 1st XP-L HI lights, then modded it with SST-20s.

This is getting more disappointing by the minute.

My very own high current Beryllium Copper springs Gen 3:
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/67401
Liitokala Aliexpress Stores Battery Fraud: http://budgetlightforum.com/node/60547

thisnameisvalid
thisnameisvalid's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 42 min ago
Joined: 06/03/2017 - 15:54
Posts: 149
Location: England, United Kingdom

Anyone found sources for 23mm AR lenses yet?

Current rotation lights: EDC; FW3A (XP-L Hi 5D) | Headlamp; H03 (NW) | Thrower; Emisar D1 (5D) | Keychain; Sofirn C01 (5600k)

zak.wilson
Offline
Last seen: 49 min 57 sec ago
Joined: 09/29/2014 - 14:27
Posts: 823

The clip looks like it’s a different color on Lumintop’s site too. I really like the (acid wash?) dark finish on mine and would definitely prefer to have that when I buy more.

Well… if I buy more. There’s an Emisar D4 v2 coming up, and Hank doesn’t cheap out like Lumintop seems to be, even when he reduces the price (the D4 was introduced at $40, which was later reduced to $35). I was concerned that early FW3As might have problems that later ones would not, but it’s looking like the opposite is true.

Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android

acab
acab's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 05/29/2019 - 16:30
Posts: 163

I have seen car manufacturers change entire global supplier agreements (these were legal contracts drafted and signed for several years) because the new parts were a few US cents cheaper. The supplier was forced to sign a new agreement. Even pennies will add up over thousands of products and SKUs.

The glass lens and Carclo optic are probably expensive, not always easy to source, and have a 100% take rate (every light sold has them/needs them, so not optional).

While most of us probably don’t want a new lens/optics combo, from an engineering point of view it is a good way to ensure an almost identical product outcome while saving a lot of money.

You could also use a cheaper aluminum source, cheaper parts for the driver, a cheaper clip or drop it entirely, re-design the inner tube and make it skinnier and a more permanent part of the assembly, replace the metal switch with a rubber boot, and do a lot more!

Big Smile

trakcon
trakcon's picture
Online
Last seen: 7 min 43 sec ago
Joined: 01/23/2019 - 15:50
Posts: 158

BlueSwordM wrote:
Yeah.
I should’ve just ordered the 1st XP-L HI lights, then modded it with SST-20s.

This is getting more disappointing by the minute.

I thought the same thing. I’m kicking myself for not just ordering all that I wanted right up front.

hank
hank's picture
Online
Last seen: 2 min 43 sec ago
Joined: 09/04/2011 - 21:52
Posts: 8119
Location: Berkeley, California
Quote:
I was concerned that early FW3As might have problems that later ones would not, but it’s looking like the opposite is true.

Yep.

I look forward to India’s manufacturers starting to make flashlights. Maybe their culture will be a better fit for meeting specifications/expectations.

Or not.

Hmmmm …. http://www.evereadyindia.com/flashlight/led-flashlights.aspx has the old type switch I’ve been missing ….

BlueSwordM
BlueSwordM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 30 min ago
Joined: 11/29/2017 - 12:34
Posts: 4972
Location: Canada

I think they should’ve just made the XP-L HI version more expensive, like with the Emisar D4.

They should’ve made the SST-20 version 29,99$US, and the XP-L HI version 39,99$US.

Not only would they have more profit margin, but they could use the XP-L HI to slightly subsidize the SST-20 version with a good optic and a lens.

My very own high current Beryllium Copper springs Gen 3:
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/67401
Liitokala Aliexpress Stores Battery Fraud: http://budgetlightforum.com/node/60547

zak.wilson
Offline
Last seen: 49 min 57 sec ago
Joined: 09/29/2014 - 14:27
Posts: 823

The thing is, this is not a product Lumintop designed themselves. If Lumintop wants to change the design of say… the Tool AA, that’s fine as long as they don’t describe the old one to customers and send the new one. At worst, reviewers and community influencers will say it’s no longer a good choice.

The FW3A is a community design where volunteers did a bunch of work because they wanted it to exist and gave the result to Lumintop. Lumintop saves development costs and gets to build a product for a known market. The community has certain expectations as a result, though they’re not enforceable in the same way a contract is. The most extreme option would be someone running a second group buy to take the design to another manufacturer. They probably do have a contract with Neal, and we don’t know what’s in it. We do know Neal was expecting 10511s and glass lenses, and that’s not what he got.

Community expectations include a glass lens, a Carclo 10511 optic, a clip of the specified design, and a metal button. If Lumintop wants to make another light derived from the FW3A design using different parts and sell that at a different price point, nobody here will complain, as long as they keep making FW3As with the original design.

Ceilingbounce – flashlight testing and runtime graphs for Android

Anthon
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 35 min ago
Joined: 09/07/2015 - 10:33
Posts: 518

I hope the CU version still brings the carclo and glass lens

trakcon
trakcon's picture
Online
Last seen: 7 min 43 sec ago
Joined: 01/23/2019 - 15:50
Posts: 158

zak.wilson wrote:
The thing is, this is not a product Lumintop designed themselves. If Lumintop wants to change the design of say… the Tool AA, that’s fine as long as they don’t describe the old one to customers and send the new one. At worst, reviewers and community influencers will say it’s no longer a good choice.

The FW3A is a community design where volunteers did a bunch of work because they wanted it to exist and gave the result to Lumintop. Lumintop saves development costs and gets to build a product for a known market. The community has certain expectations as a result, though they’re not enforceable in the same way a contract is. The most extreme option would be someone running a second group buy to take the design to another manufacturer. They probably do have a contract with Neal, and we don’t know what’s in it. We do know Neal was expecting 10511s and glass lenses, and that’s not what he got.

Community expectations include a glass lens, a Carclo 10511 optic, a clip of the specified design, and a metal button. If Lumintop wants to make another light derived from the FW3A design using different parts and sell that at a different price point, nobody here will complain, as long as they keep making FW3As with the original design.

This is a very good point. I’m trying my best to be patient. I have plans for the additional 3 that I ordered, but they’re based on the original parts being there.

Tally-ho
Tally-ho's picture
Offline
Last seen: 50 min 46 sec ago
Joined: 07/23/2011 - 04:15
Posts: 1209
Location: France

Optic drama !

teacher
teacher's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 02/23/2016 - 19:04
Posts: 9596
Location: NE & SW Alabama

BlueSwordM wrote:
I think they should’ve just made the XP-L HI version more expensive….
They did that. The XP-L HI version was/is $36 in the ‘Group Buy’. The other emitter versions $30.

You never know how a horse will pull until you hook him up to a heavy load./"Bear" Bryant 

 .................................. "Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast" ...................................

       Texas Lumens Flashlights / M4D M4X Deals : sign up - save $$$$  

         Rudeness Level _ mΩ _ {width:70%} _ LightWiki _ LED Tint Chart  

      Xlamp size chart _ BatteryU _ Flashaholic? Need Professional Help???            TheOriginal _ TAB _ LightSearch _ BatterySearch _ 14500's _ DiCal 

 

                                             

mortuus
mortuus's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 hours 29 min ago
Joined: 12/16/2014 - 09:33
Posts: 1972
Location: Sweden

this is bad.. why even change the optics to cheaper? makes no sense… sometimes i dont understand lumintops logic… Sad I understand maybe now they didnt earn enough on all group buys or whatever reason, but just bump up the price slightly then and keep the Carclo optics instead.

...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

BlueSwordM
BlueSwordM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 30 min ago
Joined: 11/29/2017 - 12:34
Posts: 4972
Location: Canada

@teacher, that’s what I said, but I think the price difference should’ve been even larger.

My very own high current Beryllium Copper springs Gen 3:
http://budgetlightforum.com/node/67401
Liitokala Aliexpress Stores Battery Fraud: http://budgetlightforum.com/node/60547

Blades
Offline
Last seen: 3 weeks 3 days ago
Joined: 09/12/2016 - 21:38
Posts: 26
Location: Fayetteville, NC

Anyone else have problems with the discount code today? Sad

--Jason--

teacher
teacher's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 02/23/2016 - 19:04
Posts: 9596
Location: NE & SW Alabama

BlueSwordM wrote:
@teacher, that’s what I said, but I think the price difference should’ve been even larger.
OK…. Thumbs Up …. But as far as jacking up the price of the XP-L HI “to slightly subsidize the SST-20 version with a good optic and a lens”…..

To me that would not be acceptable. Let the SST-20 Version pay it’s own way. No sense in punishing those of us who like, or even prefer; the XP-L HI. We want the “good optic & lens” also remember.

ymmv

You never know how a horse will pull until you hook him up to a heavy load./"Bear" Bryant 

 .................................. "Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast" ...................................

       Texas Lumens Flashlights / M4D M4X Deals : sign up - save $$$$  

         Rudeness Level _ mΩ _ {width:70%} _ LightWiki _ LED Tint Chart  

      Xlamp size chart _ BatteryU _ Flashaholic? Need Professional Help???            TheOriginal _ TAB _ LightSearch _ BatterySearch _ 14500's _ DiCal 

 

                                             

CRX
CRX's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 7 min ago
Joined: 04/02/2013 - 15:27
Posts: 3713
Location: Scotland

acab wrote:

You could also use a cheaper aluminum source, cheaper parts for the driver, a cheaper clip or drop it entirely, re-design the inner tube and make it skinnier and a more permanent part of the assembly, replace the metal switch with a rubber boot, and do a lot more!

Big Smile


No more cost saving ideas please! Big Smile

Well at least the new optic looks like it is a good match for the ruff MCPCB.
I believe the new optic setup is a bad move.

Firelight2
Firelight2's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 46 min ago
Joined: 04/08/2011 - 15:17
Posts: 3616
Location: California

In theory the new optic should produce slightly higher lumens. No light is being lost from a lens. It’s all going through the one optic.

However, it’s not surprising that we here on this forum much prefer the glass lens (for scratch resistance) combined with the flexibility of being able to swap in any Carclo optic.

Personally, I wouldn’t mind if they added the new lens, but only as an option. Maybe get a $2 discount if you opt for their lens instead of the Carclo.

shirnask
shirnask's picture
Offline
Last seen: 16 min 59 sec ago
Joined: 03/21/2016 - 23:58
Posts: 933
Location: Louisiana

At least be able to purchase the glass lens as an option

Kingjohn
Kingjohn's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 2 days ago
Joined: 09/07/2017 - 16:24
Posts: 161
Location: Austria

I would never accept a plastic lens.
Not on a light like this.
If they want to mess up this light before it even ramped up, they can do this…
But I will no longer buy it…

It’s incredible with what type of problems Neal has to cope with…
Hope he gets them sorted out and this great flashlight restored to its original design… Thumbs Up

contactcr
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 4 sec ago
Joined: 05/19/2017 - 18:52
Posts: 2380
Location: US
zak.wilson wrote:
If Lumintop wants to change the design of say… the Tool AA, that’s fine as long as they don’t describe the old one to customers and send the new one. At worst, reviewers and community influencers will say it’s no longer a good choice.

They did this with the Tool AAA already. It’s some unknown osram emitter and pebbled TIR now like the EDC01. Updated the marketing after the fact and called it by the same name.

teacher
teacher's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 02/23/2016 - 19:04
Posts: 9596
Location: NE & SW Alabama

12 June I ordered a FW3A 7A (along with some Trits & Glow stuff)

13 June I ordered a FW3A SST-20 4000K

The 7A model & other stuff was shipped 14 June. Thumbs Up

The SST-20 model is waiting to be fulfilled (as expected)

Now today we get notification from Lumintop (by way of Neal, thank you Neal. . Thumbs Up ) of an optic change & the elimination of the AR coated lens.

As far as I am concerned, this is a ridiculous move on the part of Lumintop at this early stage of the ‘FW3A Game’….. Facepalm

It not only makes Lumintop look extremely bad, but it puts Neal in a bad position…. through no fault of his own.

I am guessing my 7A version may well be as advertised when I purchased it…. Carclo optic & AR coated lens. Hopefully anyway…… Wink

But it sounds like the SST-20 version, from what I have read this morning; will not be as advertised when I bought it. It will have a “new optic” that will replace the Carclo optic & AR coated lens. Facepalm

This….. (IMO) is no way to do business Lumintop. Notification of a crappy change in a product should come before the “crappy change”….. not after.

If indeed my SST-20 version has no Carclo optic & AR coated lens…. I will be very unpleased with Lumintop.

Bottom line & end of story.

Doing away with the Carclo optic & Ar coated lens as a cost cutting measure is a bad move.

Notification after the change is an inexcusably bad move by Lumintop… as far as I am concerned.

Heck, it would have been much better to announce a slight price increase & keep the Carclo with AR coated lens.

You never know how a horse will pull until you hook him up to a heavy load./"Bear" Bryant 

 .................................. "Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast" ...................................

       Texas Lumens Flashlights / M4D M4X Deals : sign up - save $$$$  

         Rudeness Level _ mΩ _ {width:70%} _ LightWiki _ LED Tint Chart  

      Xlamp size chart _ BatteryU _ Flashaholic? Need Professional Help???            TheOriginal _ TAB _ LightSearch _ BatterySearch _ 14500's _ DiCal 

 

                                             

Pages