What should the next Foursevens QK16L UI look like? GAW winner raccoon city

I went with 3.

The difference between 350 and 400 would be nigh imperceptible, even 2 lights side-by-side, yet would at least give marginally more runtime.

I voted. 1 / 20 / 150 / 700 would be my preference within these constraints.

i voted
for #2
but you guys should study anduril UI
seriously
it’s the best

2nd runner up is BLF A6 ui

wle

6 months seemed reasonable.

Curious to know why the change so soon after all those people backed the Kickstarter project? Will the proposed change be implemented for them - or will they just be SOL and “stuck” so to speak with what they backed you with?

It seems a bit odd to say to those 1000+ supporters that the light you just bid on and are getting is going to be immediately changed right after you get yours… :question:

Our first production run on QK16L lights sold out on Kickstarter and we are about to begin the next batch, so I may have an opportunity to revise the UI to make it more nerd friendly.”

It's asking what customers think of the current, and their opinion on the possibility of changing the UI on future runs.
I'm hearing You do not want it changed so soon and keep the current UI. You may think it is
too early to change it,

but production manufacturing processes need submittal time to implement. Currently there is a small window of time

the design can be tweaked before beginning the next batch. This is why Jason is asking what everyone thinks, and

appreciates everyone's comments and opinions on Quark QK16L MKIII's UI.

I can't change the poll without resetting it, so I will include leave it the same comments as a vote for the GAW

Cool. Thanks for the answer.

Vote for Pedro keeping things the same. :smiley:

Pedro's Vote count’s

Voted! Thank you for GAV

Voted!
Personally, I always want a 10-ish lumen mode in the sequence, great for reading stuff, but that is none of the options. So 40 lumen med is closest, and much better than 100 lumen. Makes no sense to me to lower the 400 lumen to 350.

Voted for option #3

Voted for option 3. I just prefer having more options.

I voted.
Hope there is enough space on the chip to implement it.

voted option 3.

Runtime trumps almost imperceivable bright difference.

Adding a low between medium and moonlight makes the most sense to me if possible.

If not, I’d say option 1.

I voted went for option #3

I voted.

Option #3, pls.

40 and 350 are both plenty bright.

9 Day left.
Vote, reply, get entered.

Feel free to reply more than once.

Only your first poll vote and reply are counted to the GAW.
There is no disqualifying for more than one reply.
GL

I voted for 25lm option.

+1

Any winner drawn yet? :partying_face: