My current vote is for Low-High
… but…
A Low-Medium-High without mode change option would be even nicer.
If the cost premium is modest, I would go for option 3 - 3 level, mode selectable. I’m not going to take much of an upcharge though, as my preferred 3 mode option is available at good size, performance and price in the Thrunight Ti3.
I have just voted for third opción, but………
…………
…………
¿What about to get a last mode memory, like Jetbeam Jet-u??? simpler and just as practical, right?
Not quite the question you asked, but I would pay $0.50-$0.99 for 2 mode groups. That assumes the next-gen C01s comes in at MAP $9.99 - $10.99. If two mode groups are not available, I prefer LOW-HIGH on twisty lights.
Sorry maukka. You must be clearly mistaken. I do not work for Sofirn. I never have. I do not get paid and I do not get benefits of any kind by supporting them. I do it just for the fun even if it may sound strange to some people. If you still insist on your opinion please feel free to escalate this subject to sb56637.I will have your complaint clarified with sb56637 to make sure I follow the BLF rules.
I Love my Ti3 with the moonlight, low high! From what I have read here, that wonderful light may no longer be available. At least some of the new ones have a different UI. Hopefully they will choose Option 3 so that this excellent choice remains available!!!
The SC31B is my first Sofirn light. I am impressed. If it had a moonlight it would be near perfect.
That's alright, maukka. I have asked sb56637 for his opinion about it and he said that there is no need to move this thread to the commercial seller's subforum.
I am one of those (unusual?) people who prefers my AAA twisty (I EDC ’em all the time) in high-low rather than low-high, 98% of the time. Most of the time I’m in need of more light than just a couple lumens. The exception is when I go camping; waking in the middle of the night to take a leak calls for a low or moonlight output. Usually I take a different AAA twisty with me when I go camping, but a configurable light could be the best of both worlds.