ok trying to answer my own question. if i get that glass and this bead
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/33052474666.html?spm=a2g0o.cart.0.0.234a3c006RDpIs&mp=1
I already have a convoy s2+.
so I think I reflow the solder on the board. twist it out. reflow the solder on the LED. remove. then solder the bead to that board. switch out the glass. then screw it all back together and solder the board back?
seems simple enough. am I missing something?
thanks everyone.
Yes, but it won’t be very bright.
First you need to make sure your S2+ driver will not burn up that led. Ad says no more than 0.5A from driver. If you have the 8x7135 driver, you’ll need to remove all but 2 of the 7135 chips. 0.7A is probably okay.
It’s better to buy the led on the 16mm mcpcb so you dont have to reflow anything.
You won’t need the glass lens if you have the UV led.
cool. thanks. appreciate the help.
if I wanted to upgrade a tail switch for a tail clicky, is the PCB the upgrade or the switch itself.
if it is the switch can someone point me in the direction of a switch that would be an upgrade to a standard convoy tail switch?
ive ordered a few of these PCBs
https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/TCY22964
I’m not understanding you. A “clicky” is a type of switch. You want to change a switch for a switch and have it be an upgrade?
Can you be more specific, what light is it?
I just want a switch I can run high amps through without issue, I have ordered the switch PCBs do I need a different or ‘upgraded’ switch or would say the standard switch from the convoy L6 suffice.
The standard L6 switch seems to hold up really well to like 18 amps or more. The weak part of the mechanical switch is the contacts. Whenever they close you get a power surge and maybe a flash. Not much, but it can build up carbon residue or something which adds resistance.
I’ve got spare L6 switches, but my original never had any problems. I swapped a new one in and measured no difference in lumen output.
If you want something really robust, Lexel was offering a FET based switch, but it doesnt fit inside the light, it mounts outside it.
For a more conventional design I’d stick to the stock switch.
I dont know of any upgrade version to the L6 switch, but you might ask on a L6 thread.
Potted lights? Is there a list somewhere of what lights are potted? Does it really make much difference or is it still pretty much the luck of the QC draw?
I ask this as I have been playing a lot with my new th20 lately and of course have dropped it a couple of times on concrete. Other than the physical dings there are no ill effects and frankly with my experience with Thrunite I don’t expect any. Perhaps I have just been lucky and perhaps Thrunite has decent quality control but isn’t the engineering of how the pill is put together and mounted a significant factor for at least what should be likely reliability? Are Thrunite lights potted? Seems quite a few members mod the th20 specifically to get a different emitter so this should be a known thing. All I know is they have excellent thermal management and hold up to drops. This could be because of potting? There is so much I don’t know.
Could someone differentiate between the pros of Emisar D4SV2 vs D4V2, please? 
Thanks for your help JasonWW
I think these would be the main differences…
No, a regular led does not emit UV, a filter that selects for UV will leave no light left at all.
With most UV leds, very likely with this one as well, the filter is a very good idea, you do need it, because it filters away all of the visible stray light that these leds emit together with the UV light. Without a filter it can only be used for photochemical curing, with a filter it makes the UV flashlight suitable for observing fluorescent stuff.
Are you sure? I thought I saw people installing these over white leds and it has a very weak UV output.
If they block everything, what is the point of them?
My UV light doesnt use a filter and it’s great at showing fluorescing objects. I do see some visable light on certain objects. Is the filter supposed to block this visable light?
Personally, I would suggest that people just buy a good quality UV light from someone like Sofirn or Convoy. It’s going to be way more powerful then the LED mentioned above.
The led mentioned above may be pretty decent, at least the (quite extensive) specifications reproduced on the aliexpress pages mention an output of 900mW at 700mA, that is among the best around.
The output under 400nm of a typical royal blue led used under the phosfor in white leds is virtually zero. The ZWB2 filter does have some transmittance in deep red, maybe that is what people see?
The point of a UV-pass filter over a white led source is indeed pointless.
Without having a filter, your UV-light does show the strong fluorescence sources well, like white paper and glowinthedark stuff, but fluorescence of weaker sources (like stains, but also plants and most insects) is washed out by the white-ish stray light that most 365nm led emit. Unless your led is a Nichia 365nm led (like the 276A) in near-new-condition, those emit fairly little visible light. Try a filter on your light and be amazed by the new world it creates 
Agreed on the Convoy UV lights, do try to get one with the ZWB2 filter.
The led on the Convoy light uses 5 x 7135 or 1.7A. Am I wrong to assume that led is going to be much brighter than the one rated for 0.5A?
I do have the 276A. It’s great. Maybe I’ll try a filter since they are cheap.
Hi everyone, on the other forum there was a guy called Tom i think, who used to ship things to places companies would not.
Anyone on here like that? Hee in the UK. sent me a fair few lights I could not get as cheap over her
I’m looking to buy a Astrolux FT03. There are two options to choose from: a SST-40, and a XHP50.2. I want to use it for night time walks on dirt trails, and other areas with minimal to no lighting. I want to see well ahead of me as I trek around, but also a large area immediately in front of me, so I know my surroundings. Also, there are the occasional stray dogs, coyotes, and sketchy person/s that I would like to be able to shine an ultra bright light at to disorient a threat, so I can get out of harms way if needed.
What confuses me is that the SST-40 puts out a lot less lumens than the XHP50.2. I would think that the higher lumens from the XHP50.2 would make it the clear winner, but then I wonder if the SST-40 is some new technology that uses less lumens, but lights up just as bright or brighter than the XHP50.2 variant.
Never having the ability to compare them side-by-side, I am wondering which FT03 I should get for my aforementioned needs?
The SST-40 puts out a smaller hot spot than 50.2, but “intensity” or brightness of the hot spot is pretty similar. So the 50.2 has more total lumens, but its spread over a bigger area. The “intensity” is like lumens per square foot. Does that make sense?
The other differences are that the 50.2 on Turbo draws more amps than the SST-40, like 16A to 9A, so it will heat up faster. The 50.2 is more efficient at a certain brightness level. Say if both were at 1000 lumen, the 50.2 would be drawing less amps, run cooler and last longer.
I would consider both lights to be long range lights and not suitable for short range walking at night where you need to see where your stepping. Of the two, the 50.2 would probably the be better choice because of it’s bigger hot spot and brighter spill light.