Noctigon KR4/KR1 Tactical Ring / Lanyard Ring (3D printed)

Update:

This escalated quickly. Now there’s not only a lanyard ring for the short 18350 tube, but also a tactical ring for the short and the long tube!

18350 Lanyard Ring (this post!)

Tactical Ring (18650) V2.0

Tactical Ring (18350)


This nice Noctigon KR4/KR1 with a 18350 tube that could be carried very nicely on a keychain or some other kind of ring/carabiner etc. does not support the nice stainless steel lanyard ring! D’oh! My first workarounds using various techniques of paracord knotting were too bulky, ugly or both.

3D printer to the rescue! Here’s a little model I designed very quickly in OpenSCAD. Just screw off the tailcap, slide it over the tube (yeah, now it has three tubes!) and screw the tailcap back on. I designed it so that it can be printed without supports and with a 0.4 mm nozzle the thinnest part should be two perimeters thick.

Here’s the STL file and here the OpenSCAD file.

That is a clever approach and a very nice implementation of it. Thank you!

I don’t have a 3D printer yet, but I just got put onto Treatstock recently, so I finally have a reasonable way to get 3D printed parts.

—Bob Q

I’m sure there are at least some people in your area who have a 3D printer. Maybe try to find some kind of maker/hacker space or other local technical group.

I have a printer, but I’m a few hours north.

There is a maker space in Madison called Sector 67, they seem like a bunch of nice people from my limited interactions with them.
They gave a mini CNC mill to the maker space in Appleton a few years ago.

They might have someone who would be willing to do small prints for cheap.

That is cool,you are halfway to a cigar grip!

Thank you for giving me another weekend project. :person_facepalming:

lol
one of my favorite things to do is come up with big ideas if other people are going to do the work!

After some trouble with my printer, here it is. With such a little light it appears somehow bulky. Needs some improvement, maybe a bit smaller. Now working on a version for the 18650 tube which replaces the lanyard ring / clip.

PS: Never use minkowski() with high resolution! Rendering takes forever.

That looks great nice work.
Is the material pliable at all?
I think two ears would be enough for the 18350 light.

Today I finished the tactical ring for the KR1/KR4 in the 18650 version:


Noctigon KR1/KR4 Tactical Ring (18650 version)

There is a new V2 version available below.

It replaces the clip or lanyard ring. Like with the original parts you have to remove the o-rings and it is held in place by the tailcap.

STL fileOpenSCAD file

(Warning: I used minkowski() to smooth the model. This is extremely slow and depending on your machine it takes from 5 minutes to several hours to render this.)

Noctigon KR1/KR4 Tactical Ring (18350 version)

This was printed in two parts to minimize supports. The tube can be simply press-fit into the ring. Then slide it from the tail side over the 18350 tube.

STL file ringSTL file tubeOpenSCAD file

(Warning: I used minkowski() to smooth the model. This is extremely slow and depending on your machine it takes from 5 minutes to several hours to render this.)

Noctigon KR1/KR4 Tactical Ring (18650 version) V2.0

It replaces the clip or lanyard ring. Assembly is easy: Screw off the tailcap, remove both o-rings and the original clip / lanyard ring, “screw” on the tactical ring and gently but firmly press it down. Install the thick o-ring – and only the thick o-ring – and screw on the tailcap. If the light does not turn on, take everything apart and scratch off some material from the inner ring (front side).

This is an improved version, which is more robust and has integrated supports (required because of tight tolerances).

STL fileOpenSCAD file

(Warning: I used minkowski() to smooth the model. This is extremely slow and depending on your machine it takes some minutes to several hours to render this.)

So dope !!! Thank you, I’m going to print some this week.

Thanks I got one printed, you were right about tolerance, had to sand it down a little bit to get it to fit.


Nice! Yeah, it’s quite tight, but I designed it a bit tighter because it is easier to remove 0.1 mm if necessary.

What material did you use? Appears glossy. PETG?

Nice work!

Not a tactical ring, but rings. Looked at a piston ring today and thought that it should work for the KR1/KR4 as well. The seams are on the other side…