Any Suspicious Observers members here?

This would be a very expensive conspiracy involving 90% of all researchers in this field. At least if I had to be part in a conspiracy, I’d take a serious amount of money :money_mouth_face: .

I prefer to believe they’re doing a solid scientific job. That’s what we pay them for.

It's definitely possible you are in the right direction and most others aren't.
Many people take the big media for gospel truth, and we know that CNN is a lot of fake news, yet millions of people are using it as their news source. And whatever agenda they are pushing, the average folks, (including myself) take these things for truth.

I don't say they are consiparacy theories, but the 'wise scientist' can't even come to 1 conclusion, and they don't accept a different viewpoint.. It's fun to see how in the 70's people (the other 'wisest scientists' are talking about a returning ice age, and now global warming.. we are talking about 50 years later.. who knows what will happen in 50 years. But, we only have to trust the 'wisest scientists' that the Media uses to push a narrative, others are just speculators and conspiracy theorists.

People think they are smarter than God or can control nature.. just love how they brand all the scientists with different conclusions as conspiracy theorists or global warming deniers...

it's the same as kindergarten....

Hi everyone, please carefully avoid all controversial subjects in this thread. Defending a certain side on hot-button social/political/scientific issues won’t change anybody’s mind on this forum, but it absolutely will lead to a nasty argument, so please avoid such topics at all cost. Thanks a lot.

Climate research has some history, starting with Arrhenius.

Keep in mind the current view doesn’t come out of nothing, neither is it especially new. It originates from more than 120 years old studies and has undergone numerous refinements.

I point this out since some posts create an impression of scientists running around like beheaded chickens. Please stop that comedy and concentrate on the facts.

Edit: Found this on the history - The History of Climate Science

I, too, am only interested in facts. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, almost 100% of the warming observed since 1950 has been human-caused. According to NASA, humans have increased the atmospheric CO2 concentration by 47% since the industrial revolution. This has measurable effects on our climate. For a good summary of the science, see, e.g., National Climate Assessment

The other planets in our solar system are changing due to natural causes. Planets have always changed. There is no evidence of a giant financial conspiracy involved in studying climate change.

yes :THUMBS-UP:

I gave it 12 post before it got locked down. It’s staying surprisingly civil. :wink:

Again, because learning from history is one of the best ways to understand science, if you’re willing to read:

Nice Fringe reference. :+1:

Yep, “it’s going to get colder” — in Europe.

For myself, I have seen it warm up in my lifetime in this area.
Fact - Glaciers are going buh-by.
Fact - The headlines above are old but real.
Fact - majoroverkill notes that there are forces at play we are not aware of.
Fact - There are “theorys of why the North pole moved 20 miles last year, but no factual reason yet.
Fact - The poles have swapped ends several times.

It leads me to believed that there are longer term cycles which us humans are not aware of. Where I live now is a verdant lush forested area that was under 500 feet of solid ice 12,000 years ago (give or take). Where did the ice go? It was all gone before the industrial age.

Regardless, what I do know leads me to believe that we should at least take the easy steps to avoid man made global warming. Look at the car you drive. Is it a hybrid getting 55 mpg? If not, why not. Do you expect that you can ignore it and someone else will pick up your slack? Blame others…the .gov? We can and should, all step up our game as individuals. Toyota Corolla hybrids only cost @$23,000. As individuals we can insulate our houses. Turn off the AC and turn down the heat when needed etc etc.

https://www.weather.gov/news/201509-solar-cycle

It’s like a game… let’s push it until sb shows up… JUST kidding!!!

Rat hole arguments are a waste of time and of course I (like all here) think a few here are “off” but this isn’t the place to (waste time trying to…) prove them wrong. Great policy and well said sb! :+1:

Daily news for those who are interested, if not its all good. Ice Age Trigger, Cloud Discovery Changes Climate Science | S0 News Sep.18.2020 - YouTube

Our Websites:
https://www.Suspicious0bservers.org
https://www.SpaceWeatherNews.com
https://www.QuakeWatch.net/prediction…

https://www.MagneticReversal.org

Facebook: Facebook
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mobileobser…

Wanted- Earthquake Forecasters: Wanted: Earthquake Forecasters - YouTube
Earthquake Forecasting Contest: Earthquake Forecasting Contest | Win $250 or more! - YouTube
Contest Information: Contest – Quake Watch

Today’s Featured Links:
Polar Ice Loss = Ice Age: https://instaar.colorado.edu/news-eve…
Turbulent Astronomy: https://portal.uni-koeln.de/en/univer…
Turbulent Cloudy Climate: https://www.mtu.edu/news/stories/2020…
Hubble Red White & Blue Jupiter: https://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hvi/upl…

For entertainment and the open minded. COSMIC DISASTER | CIA: Classified - YouTube

izzat “0bservers” or “Observers”?

Watch out for looialike substitutions in site names, they can misdirect you.

Heres a good explanation of the suns cyclical effect on the heating/cooling of the planet. https://electroverse.net/analysis-finds-solar-activity-controls-climate-change/

This was a great read, thank you. I see this a lot and especially this year where these sites are being shutdown and I have to ask the question why. Part of the prosses is the earth heating up, the polar caps start to melt. When enough melt occurs it starts to change the salinity and temperatures of the oceans affecting the North Atlantic currant, slows down, which is connected to the jet stream. Fresh water freezes at 32 degrees, seawater at 28.4 degrees. Its like a recipe for disaster. The heat melts the caps, the caps change the salinity and temperatures effecting the flow of the oceans, a hard winter hits and the caps start to grow! This has happened with the last four ice ages. NOAA and NASA are starting to realize this in the last couple of years. Our planet can only heat up so much before it starts to freeze and a very small salinity and temperature change in our oceans is all it takes.

Bibliographic Entry Result
(w/surrounding text) Standardized
Result
Spaulding & Markowitz, Heath Earth Science. Heath, 1994: 195. “The Greenland glacier is about 1,700,000 km2 and up to 3 km in thickness.” < 5.1 × 106 km3
(Greenland)
“The Antarctic glacier covers a larger landmass with an area of about 12.5 million km2 and reaches a thickness of nearly 5 km.” < 62.5 × 106 km3
(Antarctica)
“Greenland.” World Book Encyclopedia. Chicago: World Book, 1999: 325. “It covers 672,000 mi2 (1,740,500 km2) or about 4/5 of the island. The ice caps average over 1 mile (1.6 km) thick, and a thickness of over 2 miles (3.2 km) has been measured.” 2.8 × 106 km3
(Greenland)
“Antarctica.” World Book Encyclopedia. Chicago: World Book, 1999: 532. “Its volume of 7¼ million cubic miles (30 million km3) represents about 70% of the world’s fresh water.” 30 × 106 km3
(Antarctica)
Williams, Richard S. Jr., & Jane G. Ferrigno. Estimated present-day area and volume of glaciers and maximum sea level rise potential. Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World. US Geological Survey (USGS). “Geographic region: Greenland
Percent: 10.82
Volume: 2,600,000 km3
Percent: 7.9
Maximum sea level rise potential: 6.5 m
Area: 1,736,095 km2” 2.6 × 106 km3
(Greenland)
“Geographic region: Antarctica
Percent: 84.64
Volume: 30,109,800 km3
Percent: 91.49
Maximum sea level rise potential: 73.44 m
Area: 13,586,400 km2” 30.1098 × 106 km3
(Antarctica)
Schultz, Gwen. Ice Age Lost. 1974. 232, 75. “The US geological survey gives these figures: The Greenland ice cap with its volume of 630,000 cubic miles, if melted could yield enough water to maintain the Mississippi river for over 4,700 years.” 2.6 × 106 km3
(Greenland)
“It has been calculated that if Antarctica’s approximately 6,000,000 cubic miles of ice should melt, the level of the oceans all over the world would rise 200 feet.” 25 × 106 km3
(Antarctica)
Denmark/Greenland. Greenland Tourism. Danish Tourist Board. “The ice cap or inland ice covers 1,833,900 square km, equivalent to 85 percent of Greenland’s total area, and extends 2,500 km (1,553 miles) from north to south and up to 1,000 km from east to west. At its center, the ice can be up to 3 km thick, representing 10 percent of the world’s total fresh water reserves. If all the ice were to melt, the world’s oceans would rise seven meters.” < 5.5 × 106 km3
(Greenland)
Erickson, Jon. “Glacial Geology.”1996, 161. “The ice sheet rises nearly 3 miles in places, with an average thickness of over 7,000 feet amounting to about 7 million cubic miles of ice.” 29 × 106 km3
(Antarctica

Question is not why, but by whom ( X-Files music playing ) :stuck_out_tongue: