Those are diodes, I assume to prevent a reversed battery condition from breaking things. I would not have expected it in the tailcap though…
If you replace them with bridges you will lose that function, but you may also not care depending on the driver you use.
I was wondering if that is what they are, but it did seem strange to be in the contact plate. I may just leave them if that’s the case. Since I am going to do 8 in series, I have to put in a 3rd guide pin, so that the tail cap can only go on one way, as it can be on or 180 on now. Can’t have that with 8 in series.
I think it makes sense there, as they are somewhat sizeable components due to the current and possible heat dissipation needs, as well as to provide a battery bridge. Just checked my EA4W and according to my DMM, and it’s just a straight bridge. Guess they weren’t as concerned about reverse polarity with the little guys.
You are setting the bar so high OL I’m going to have to take up pole vault. Tell me you punched out the little copper round tabs and not cut them out by hand and file them to shape on the battery board?
I like the use of the pcb for the smd switch. Very clever. I wonder if the stock board could be modded(sense resistor change) for more output or if the components are already maxed out.
Sorry if this is O/T but all the smart folks likely to have done this before are already in here... anybody know of a source for parts to build a drop-out battery carrier? Specifically the female threaded rod to tie the two plates together. I can make the contact boards easy enough, but for the rods I don't know where to look or really even what I need to go look for.
Reverse polarity protection diodes. I guess not altogether a bad idea, considering they seem to have designed everything on this light to be as complex as possible for no good reason! lol
Yes I checked that out with a meter, but they do add resistance, so they are history and copper is in place of them. No resistance now.
[/quote]
Pure copper is a terrible diode, but in this case I would have done the same thing. It’s monkey-proofing that is eating precious wattage. They didn’t have it on the EA$, so I dunno why they added it here.