ZebraLight SC52 + ZL 14500 = 59.50$

Hi Kreisler,

I bought an SC52 a couple of weeks ago from Illumination Supply. I was really impressed by the SC52. Its my first ZL so I was in for a real treat. Awesome UI. Fantastic build quality. Nice, crisp edges and finely textured (almost belt-sanded) finish to the anodizing. Different from any flashlight I own, from Fenix, to Nitecore, to Eagletac. Closest anodizing would be my Inova T3 from way back.
On 14500 it seems nearly as bright as the TX25C2, but of course it isn’t.
Overall, I think it is the light that impressed me most in my collection.

is the $59 price tag good enough to overlook the upcoming SC52w (XM-L2)? I’m going to assume that the going rate of $64 of the SC52 will drop when the 52w becomes available?

at a $5 discount its not huge (but the extra battery is nice)

google doc

Ahh, this is exciting to see! I wonder if they’ll stock some ZL headlights too.

Thanks for your input!!

I asked about the coupon code, and they replied that "the coupon code will expire in the end of May". I think i am gonna pull the trigger later this week.

The SK-68 is pretty nice… I EDC’d one for a while. But it lacks any low modes, and its maximum runtime is only like 3 hours on medium. The SC52 is smaller and has more output options (brighter and dimmer) and vastly longer runtimes. However, it doesn’t throw as far as a zoomed SK-68 and it’s always spot+spill instead of the SK-68’s even circle of light. The SK-68 provides better lighting for photography, works better as a pointer, is a good cheap gift, and throws farther… but the SC52 is otherwise much more versatile.

I’ve hardly touched my SK-68 since I got a Zebralight. The only times I’ve used the SK-68 lately were when I wanted to project an image using a transparency sheet and a loupe. It has become a museum piece in my collection, only used for occasional tricks.

I’ve EDC’d my SC52 for a few months and it has banged against things and doesn’t have a scratch on it. Its metal and/or anodizing must be really hard. OTOH, after just 2-3 weeks of EDCing my JETBeam RRT01, it already has a few scars after being subjected to the same abuse as my SC52.

Besides, the SC52 is already ugly by design; what’s wrong with a few scratches to go with its less-than-appealing appearance? With such a military aesthetic, it seems appropriate to have battle scars. (don’t get me wrong… I love my SC52 and it’s tied for #1 on my list of non-angled lights I recommend to people… but I still think it’s ugly)

I think my EDC recommendation list currently is:

  1. ZL H51
  2. ZL SC52 or JB RRT01 (hard to decide, both are very nice)
  3. Depends on the desired usage… SK-68 or Olight i3/i3s/A3EOS or other 1xAAA or, really, almost anything in my sig below. Currently I’m a bit infatuated with the L3 L10-219 but that’s because it’s new and my first high-CRI light.

Probably not. Zebralights usually keep the same price for the entire time they’re available. Instead of dropping prices after a while, they just discontinue the product.

… forgive me for being dense, but was that a joke? Sometimes I can’t tell.

+1

I have been carrying my SC52, with my keys in the same pocket for a few weeks now.

Most lights end up as somewhat battle scarred veterans rather promptly. Jetbeam BC25, Eagletac G25CS MkII, Crelant V11A, Crelant 7G3CS, surefore 6p, Skyray 16340 (I don't remember the model), etc,. All of them had marks after a relatively short time.

The SC52 still looks brand new, and pristine, aside from one tiny flaw, that was present to begin with. (Really really small dent on one of the heat fins.)

Zebralights are truly ugly though. No getting around that.

Hi Toykeeper,

I agree with the ugly comment. The SC52 is the least ugly of all the other ZLs in my opinion. Too bad… it is the most amazing light I own.
Actually, the SC80 is decent looking.

ok thanks!… argh… must… resist….!!! i already ‘accidentally’ ordered the TF-R2… :stuck_out_tongue:

LOL, I hate and love those “accidents”

The more I look at this light the more I like it. The 2 things stopping me is price and the warranty / customer service. Heard a few bad stories of customers getting the run around, poor communication & 2 month turn around time, where sometimes nothing is resolved.

I’m stuck on this or the Quark. Only 2 lights I know of that meet my reqs of 1 AA and good low mode choices (sub 0.5 less is better)… and atleast a couple modes under 35 lumens (–3+ & –25+ preferably ). Under $60.

*Surviving with my 10 yr old mini maglite (not buying another drugstore LED), untill I replace with a proper main edc for general, outdoor, utility, battery conservation scenarios. The 2 month service from ZL has me, well, scared. Should I be?

It's been my experience that most problems surface immediately, where electronics are concerned. With regular intensive use, even more problems, (if there are any,) come up within the 2-3 week period.

Only very rarely do problems surface months after you buy.

So long as you test your light thoroughly, and intensely, during the week or so after receiving it, and so long as you buy from a good authorized retailer, assuming you don't abuse the light, the retailer will exchange it, or take it back. The chances of getting two duds in a row, or a light that develops a problem after a while are low.

You also need to do basic maintenance, which means use some compressed air to blow out the dust from the insides, every few months. Clean the threads, change the o-ring, apply fresh lubricant. Considering you've made due with a maglite for 10 years, it's safe to say you really know how to take care of your stuff.

So should you be scared? No.


Now about the price. That's a different issue. I went through three other cheaper AA lights, trying to save. Balder HD1, Crelant V11A, and Thrunite Archer 1A.

Two of them had issues out of the box. Missing o-ring on the archer. Shitty interface on the HD1. The crelant was fine, but did not work all that well on regular AA batteries.

So by trying to be frugal, I ultimately ended up spending more, only to be unhappy with the results.

The SC52 was, and is, the most expensive AA light I ever bought. It was bought basically as a result of frustration, at not being able to find what I want, and saying f*ck it. Now I'm very glad I spent the money on it.

There is a downside to this story. After trying it, I've now been forced to buy the SC600II as well.

There’s a reason people talk about Zebralights so much. Nearly every product they make is best in its class. Like, when selfbuilt reviewed the SC52, he had to compare it against 2xAA lights to give it a fair comparison because the other 1xAA lights just weren’t competitive.

It took me a long time to work up the nerve to buy a $64 flashlight (ZL H51), but after I received it I didn’t regret it at all. It’s the most useful torch I’ve ever seen, and I use it several times per day despite having gotten many newer lights since then. If I could keep only one light, it’d be my H51. My only regret is getting the ‘w’ version instead of the original cool white. The 4200K tint is too yellow for me.

As for the SC52, it may well be the best traditional 1xAA light on the market… but I find that angled lights (H51) are more useful because I don’t have to hold the light in my hand.

wolf413chris, if price is the main issue, you might also want to consider the L3 Illumination L10 light. It’s 1xAA and the 4-mode version does ~0.09lm, ~3lm, ~30lm, and ~120lm. It comes with a cool white XP-G2 emitter (higher output) or a Nichia 219 4500K 92CRI emitter (awesome color rendition) and costs $20 or $25.

It’s not the most efficient light (runtimes are way shorter than a Zebralight) but it’s still a nice option for 1xAA with decent modes at a lower price.

I might join you if for some reason my O’pen order from Hke falls through. These 2 were my two finalist for a smallish flashlight.

so tempted… but i think i’ll wait for my DQG 18650 to come in first…

And now they have the Zebralight H51w too! 69.70$ - 15% = 59.25

Yup, a really tough choice. In the end, I decided you could sort of sub in something for the Zebra. It would have less run time and not as wide as a range in light, but same utility or usuage. It just hard to find something else that would look as right in a shirt pocket like the O’pen.

Hmmm… now a head lamp is something I don’t have… I don’t really need it but so tempting.

For camping trips, or blackouts, it's really nice to have one.

Not having to use your hands to direct the light, or having it under your arm, or in your teeth, etc, it's kind of a pain in the butt.

My one major criticism of the SC52 is that the clip is is not reversible. Otherwise given it's size, it would be no trouble at all to just clip it to the bill of a hat.

One other observation about headlamps...

You really don't want a super bright one. If you're not the only person around, you're going to annoy people fast when you face them, and keep hitting them with your light.

On the one hand, thank you for taking the time to write this informative and educational post. On the other hand stop tempting me!!! :bigsmile: