Match's Mods: Homemade Integrating Sphere

I finally cut the ball apart. It was pretty cool when I punctured the ball. I used kitchen plastic wrap and that worked nicely. No sticking or anything. I used a hole saw to cut the holes. I made the flashlight hole as big as my SF Masterpiece because it is the biggest one I have. For the Lux meter hole I only made a 2cm because I don't know how big the sensor will be. Hopefully it will come in the mail today. Match, how did you cut your holes? I used a hole saw but don't know how I am going to fine tune the sensor hole. I tried a sanding bit and a stone grinding bit on the dremel but they didn't do anything. Maybe the hole I already made will be perfect. It could happen.

http://www.lightglassoptics.com/Newport-819-IS-2-Integrating-Sphere--2-inch_p_709.html

$1100 for a two inch lab grade one!

And the detectors (meters) are expensive!

Looking very nice, Lang! I cut and trimmed my holes using a very sharp razor blade.

The only light I have that has a known lumen value is the UF 3 mode dropin. I know these values from Matches numbers.
Using my lux numbers
H 3600 lux
M 1250
L 210
And Matches lumen numbers
H 838
M 280
L 49
I came up with correction factors of
H 4.30
M 4.46
L 4.28
So if I take the 3600 lux reading and divide by 4.35 I get 827 lumen.
After I figured all of this out I remeasured the high and kept getting 3800 lux. I’ll have to do more measurements and figure it out better.
Using the numbers I have now, I measured the SF Masterpiece pro1 with one cell @ 202 lumens which seems spot on to me.
ITP EOS A3 XP-G R5 w/10440 333 lumen
XR-E Q5 14500 252 lumen
These seem pretty close with the Cree charts, a bit high maybe.I think I’m going in the right direction. I know I was a bit off on my initial figures, I get hyper sometimes, so I’ll go back now and try to refine things.
If I’m doing it all wrong, let me know
Just tested the Tmart 502B Q5 AK47A driver @ 223 lumen. The Cree charts show 233-251 @1A

It looks like my 202 reading for the Masterpiece is in line with what this review reports http://www.lumensreview.com/reviews/1-led-flashlights/104-solarforce-masterpiece-pro-i-review.html It says aprox 200 with 1 cell and I got 202. By the way, have I reported how sweet the Masterpiece is? It is.

Looking good, Lang. I'd definitely say you're on the right track. I used both of my zebra's (H51 and SC60) since they've been tested out the wazoo and seem quite repetitive. My only concern with using the UF 3mode xml drop-in is that the high isn't current regulated, and dependent on the battery quality.

Your right about that P60 Match. I think I got lucky with the one I started with. I tested a couple of others and got different readings. It is very battery dependent. Everything seems to match up now with the two lights I have good numbers for.
This has been a great project. It’s so much fun to play with. Thanks for sharing this one Match.
All I have to do now is the final paint job.

I thought real otf numbers were something like 25 to 30% less than what the cree numbers were .

It was Great!!!!!! But could you let me know making out Lumen from the Lux measured ?

Thanks!

It was great, but could you let me know making out lumen from Lux measured?

Thanks!

In the post you quoted above, the information you are looking for is right under the picture of the finished, painted sphere.

There's a quite complex formula that takes the area in sq feet inside the IS and extrapolates a lumen rating from the lux measured, while taking in the refraction and absorption of the sphere coating itself.... :Sp

Me? I cheated and just took a light with a known lumen value to determine what my sphere correction value should be.

For example.... A test light is known to give out 200lm. When you shine it in your sphere you get 2,530 lux. Dividing the lux by the lumens gives 12.65. This is the correction value (for this example).

Then, all you need to do is divide any lux readings from your sphere by this set correction value to give you the lumen output.

Hope that makes sense.

Awesome build Match!

Now I need to find me some nice round inflated rubber balls

In fact the math is quite simple:

Hit the hole in the sphere with a uniform beam of parallel light (e.g. a throwers hot spot at several (5-10) meters distance).

Measure the intensity just in front of the hole with a luxmeter.

(This number is lumens pr. square meter that hits into the sphere.)

Multiply with the hole's area in sq.meters and the result is the lumens number that enter the sphere - simple and easy.

The only difficulty I can see here is the sagging intensity from the thrower, when you remove the outer luxmeter and read the one build into the sphere the light might have dropped a little. Just repeat the procedure a couple of times and you will get corresponding values.

Thank You very much!!!!! It was really great..

Thank you!

Interesting discussion over on this thread about if a I.S. is even necessary. Linked to there to save it for posterity :)

Wow, to use cut down and use a large globe is a brilliant idea. Has anyone tried it ??????? ............ Knobby

Will work.

Sixty545 built his from two lampshades. And he used to make measurement equipment for a living.

A beach ball is cheaper...

Here’s a bump for the Xsphere.

I took an inflatable beach ball that was advertised at 24 inches across, imagine my surprise when it was actually nineteen !!!

With the vinyl being so thin, I chose to not prepare the surface for removal, as it will be a far smoother surface than I could make with paper mache.

I used Elmer’s Glue-All for the adhesive, and went to town with a bunch of newspapers from the kindling pile.

I could have made the entire thing from dollar bills, and it would STILL have been cheaper than a lab-grade sphere…

Here it is, drying after a round of paint, and a taped-up circumferential cut. I will need to carve out the light and sensor ports when the meter arrives. Barium sulfate is also en route, so we’ll see how that stuff works out.