Yes, it's irritating when companies release an inferior version of the same product name. I wouldn't even mind if Romisen released a cheaper version, but they need to label it as such, a different model name, or something to designate it as the cheapo version.
It's very probably the cheaper made version, with a lower quality tailcap, reverse clicky, Q3 and 3-mode.
Still a good price!
I havve one of these, and while it is more cheaply made, the compromises are mostly where it is less important. There's a review here which I really must finish.
It's very probably the cheaper made version, with a lower quality tailcap, reverse clicky, Q3 and 3-mode.
Still a good price!
Oh! I did not know that there were two versions. Dont know why Romisen want to harm
their good reputation by making inferior products.
Cheap quality is good - Expensive crap isn´t
Yes, it's irritating when companies release an inferior version of the same product name. I wouldn't even mind if Romisen released a cheaper version, but they need to label it as such, a different model name, or something to designate it as the cheapo version.
Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!
I havve one of these, and while it is more cheaply made, the compromises are mostly where it is less important. There's a review here which I really must finish.
http://budgetlightforum.cz.cc/node/497
The numbers from my light tests are always to be found here.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApkFM37n_QnRdDU5MDNzOURjYllmZHI...
Thanks Nautic for the link. I bought this Q3 version so I can compare with my Q5 version (supposedly the better made one).
When you get it tell us which is better