[Review] Manker E11 XP-L AA/14500

Luck has never been strong with me, but I’ll update when it arrives. :person_facepalming:

please check http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?420275-Review-Manker-E11-AA-14500-XP-L

please check :http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?420275-Review-Manker-E11-AA-14500-XP-L

Don't worry, E11 have lanyard hole on the tail cap.

really? where 2?

Hey Budda,
Great review again! Just to confirm, is the switch button rubber or silicone? Thanks!

Can you explain to me how can I tell the difference?
Maybe Manker guys knows better :slight_smile:

EDIT: they told me it’s nitrile rubber.

Will the E11 available at GearBest in the future?
K.

Manker told me no.
By the way, I got a Efest 14500 IMR and monday I should get runtime at high medium and low.

How about some runtime plots with 14500

Using Efest 14500 IMR v2 700mAh, charged each time at 0.5A.





Thanks for confirming that:) Does the material feels the same on the T01?

Well, it arrived today. It’s the NW (marked “3D” on box), and I can happily say that I see no green at all. Quite pleased with the tint and the light overall, should make for a great edc. :+1:

1+ for Manker E11 NW so far! will put it on the test tomorrow in the woods.

  • Cons so far… boring black… the clip scrapes the anodizing… only selected 14500 batteries.
  • Pros … small … bright up to 850lm with good 14500, nice tint (NW)

@Ktsl: yes, it does.

Thanks Budda!

Any discount code for the E11?

Awesome little light! For me it’s UI is much better than the Klarus Mi7… would like it even more if it had a XP-L HI smooth reflector option. I’d rather have little more throw than flood in a light this size.

Manker always asked me to test and compare the Mi7 to the E11. Last week I received and tested a Klarus Mi7. Here I compare the plots. Keep in mind that the Manker E11 was tested with a Efest 14500 IMR V2 700mAh V2 and the Klarus Mi7 with a Efest 14500 IMR 650mAh (the latest model from Efest). A difference of 50 mAh should translate around a 13% difference in runtime.

Thank you Budda, very interesting chart!