Well in my opinion in the first two photos the TN31 wins. And the TN31 looks to win in the last two as well. That’s looking off the brightness of the pole on each photo.
I think aspheric wins everytime,but TN-31 does pretty good for a reflectored light.Crelant with front lens removed did 133k lux and the TN-31 got around 93k,so I would expect the crelant to win.Thanks for the cool beamshots rikr.
Well I’m just going off what the camera shows. And the TN31 wins in each shot from what I see. The whole top of tower is lit up more on the Tn31 photos.
Well I think this says a lot for a TN31 when you got to compare an aspheric XM-L thrower to possibly try and beat it. Put an aspheric lens on the TN31 and it would be no contest. And that’s not taking away or trying to put down Rick’s thread, but I’m just pointing this out.
And I still think the camera sees better than what we see. And again I believe the camera picked the TN31 as the winner each time.
I can tell you right now that the K40 I have will whip the original Crelant 7G5 I have which was said by selfbuilt to be brighter in lux than the 7G5V2. If you put a aspeherical lens on the K40 or TN31, your gonna be talking a lot more lux than the Crelant 7G5V2 with the collimator.