Fenix RC40 Full Desktop Review by Patriot36

71 posts / 0 new
Last post

Pages

Spasmod
Spasmod's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 5 months ago
Joined: 12/29/2012 - 20:17
Posts: 508
Location: UK West Country
Fenix RC40 Full Desktop Review by Patriot36

Fenix RC40 Full Desktop Review by Patriot36
 

Edited by: sb56637 on 09/02/2017 - 12:11
InfinitusEquitas
InfinitusEquitas's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
Joined: 09/06/2012 - 02:31
Posts: 1983
Location: 20 Minutes from NYC

I guess I know what I'll be watching tonight instead of netflix.

blueb8llz
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 06/02/2012 - 01:16
Posts: 2977
Location: California

thanks for the video review. nicely done as usual. cant wait for the 3rd edition on the review. please have beamshots going against the tk70 & 75 please.

gearjunkie
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 5 months ago
Joined: 01/08/2012 - 21:33
Posts: 323
Location: Tennessee, United States

Cir2kuk
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 5 months ago
Joined: 01/29/2013 - 08:40
Posts: 17

Shame it doesn’t have XM-L2 Sad

InfinitusEquitas
InfinitusEquitas's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
Joined: 09/06/2012 - 02:31
Posts: 1983
Location: 20 Minutes from NYC

Cir2kuk wrote:
Shame it doesn't have XM-L2 :(

Or a battery pack that uses top of the line batteries as opposed to just decent ones.

FlashPilot
FlashPilot's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 25 min ago
Joined: 05/10/2010 - 16:07
Posts: 4573
Location: USA

IMO, no XML2, proprietary battery pack and probably a glued head & bezel make this yet another big fenix fail.

Just say “no” to buying glued flashlights.

InfinitusEquitas
InfinitusEquitas's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
Joined: 09/06/2012 - 02:31
Posts: 1983
Location: 20 Minutes from NYC

The battery pack I can certainly at least understand the logic on, and it's possible they will release higher capacity ones in the future.  

This light does not seem to be geared toward the flashlight community in that regard.  I'd rather be able to use the dozens of batteries I already own... but for a new user, that never used lithium batteries, or one that just doesn't want the hassle... it makes sense.  As an alternative, I wish they would offer a battery carrier as well... 

The part that I find is absolutely inexcusable, is using the xmlu2 emitters.

This could be a blessing in disguise though... lights with older emitters tend to drop in price pretty fast, and if fenix releases a u3 version after running through the u2 stock, and xml2 a few months later... being budget minded (this is BLF after all) we could hope for pretty good prices on a slightly older model.

At $200 I would buy this in a heartbeat...

djozz
djozz's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 2 hours ago
Joined: 09/07/2012 - 17:04
Posts: 15799
Location: Amsterdam

My girlfriend would find a 10 minute flashlight review video (sorry, did not watch the 45 minute version) without the light even turned on hilarious. (not me of course, I believe that is just being thorough Wink )

But is sure is an impressive light!

Rusty Joe
Rusty Joe's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 days 22 hours ago
Joined: 07/24/2011 - 00:22
Posts: 3010
Location: San Antonio, TX

I watched the whole thing! Wow! I hate the body style less now, too.

Eat Once a Day - Lose Weight - Feel Great!

www.omad.info

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155

No!!!! Throw about the same with TK70. I must buy RC40. I like the design and its big size though Smile
But the battery indicator kind of copying Olight SR series. But charging indicator is different though.

cool i'll see you when you get there

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 11 months ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8864
Location: Eastern PA

FlashPilot wrote:
IMO, no XML2, proprietary battery pack and probably a glued head & bezel make this yet another big fenix fail. Just say "no" to buying glued flashlights.
I'm with Flash on this. While I won't go so far as to say it's a total fail, I do agree with all the other points. I'm sure it's going to do well in its market with Fenix's own version of the Surefire fan boy club. They will see no need to mod it and don't know enough to care about its weak battery pack and won't flinch to throw cash at it.  It's just not for me unless Fenix sent me one to try and change my mind but I would still only see what it could have been and view it as a fail. 
DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155

I am not so into modding, maybe I am not retired yet. No time and effort for that. Anything above 6 or above 18650 batteries, I prefer proprietary battery pack. As that is simpler for me. And XML2 is not really very attractive to me. It is for those company who can’t innovate enough and just use it for advertisement, for example TN31. And I am not falling into their advertisement. Just see how many are really very satisfied with XML2. I remember someone actually sold his TN30 XML2 and keep his TN30 U2.

I am sure whoever miss Fenix high end flashlights is missing great design in flashlight. I am missing TK75 because I already bought TK70 and TN30.

cool i'll see you when you get there

Sirius9
Sirius9's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 20 min ago
Joined: 03/04/2012 - 19:23
Posts: 4561
Location: South Europe

want 1, want 1, want 1 Big Smile

 

C-channel
C-channel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
Joined: 03/22/2012 - 07:23
Posts: 634
Location: Singapore

A very nice and informative review.. nice light…

How bright is bright enough...

Runtime VS Lumens...

Chidwack2
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 11 months ago
Joined: 03/16/2013 - 00:14
Posts: 326

A RC40 will live at my house before I’m finished buying flashlights.

myst999
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 05/04/2011 - 16:25
Posts: 146
Location: New York

Beamshots by Patriot36:

dthrckt
dthrckt's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 11/08/2011 - 10:11
Posts: 4040
Location: Upstate NY

FlashPilot wrote:
IMO, no XML2, proprietary battery pack and probably a glued head & bezel make this yet another big fenix fail.

Just say “no” to buying glued flashlights.

yup

____________________

Girls can shoot!

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155
myst999 wrote:
Beamshots by Patriot36:

Really impressed with RC40 beating TK75 by a lot to me knowing TK75 is one of the best flash light in the market.

cool i'll see you when you get there

InfinitusEquitas
InfinitusEquitas's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 months ago
Joined: 09/06/2012 - 02:31
Posts: 1983
Location: 20 Minutes from NYC

Just watched both of the videos, and I am rather impressed with the TM26 Silly

With the RC40... if Fenix could correct two issues, they will have another buyer for the light... newer LEDs, and higher capacity battery pack.

Patriot also mentioned that the buttons were too easy to press... probably not a major issue but worth taking note of.  I hate it when things turn on accidentally  and would rather have a light that's a bit of a pain to turn on, versus one that can be turned on by any jostle.

MRsDNF
MRsDNF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 12/22/2011 - 21:18
Posts: 12971
Location: A light beam away from the missus in the land of Aus.

Fantastic video. Thanks. That is one monster light.

 

djozz quotes, "it came with chinese lettering that is chinese to me".

                      "My man mousehole needs one too"

old4570 said "I'm not an expert , so don't suffer from any such technical restrictions".

Old-Lumens. Highly admired and cherished member of Budget Light Forum. 11.5.2011 - 20.12.16. RIP.

 

janko.hrasko
janko.hrasko's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 06/12/2011 - 12:51
Posts: 623
Location: Kosice, Slovakia

I’m glad that it has a battery pack -you can charge it way easier than getting out 6 18650 and charging them instead.. but a battery holder would be a nice option too Smile
the sad thing about it for me (except the price of course) is no nw version and not using xml2

blueb8llz
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 06/02/2012 - 01:16
Posts: 2977
Location: California
DENGOH wrote:
No!!!! Throw about the same with TK70. I must buy RC40. I like the design and its big size though Smile But the battery indicator kind of copying Olight SR series. But charging indicator is different though.

are you saying that this rc40 throws the same as the tk70? if so, i have to get a rc40 also! thats assuming the rc40 is floodier than the tk70 right?

indenial
Offline
Last seen: 3 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 06/01/2012 - 12:36
Posts: 476
Location: San Jose

Excellent review.

Nice light, but even with the extra accessories, battery pack, etc., I think it’s about $100.00 overpriced. I’ll have to pass unless some retailer has it for a third off retail.

My name is indy, and I've been a flashaholic since 2004.

blueb8llz
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 06/02/2012 - 01:16
Posts: 2977
Location: California

just watched the beamshot video, was expecting to see a tk70 comparison at the end, but nope.
now its hard for me to make my decision, i had a tk70 so seeing the beams together and seeing what the differences are, would have helped.
but now, it didnt really impress me when it went against the tm26 and tk75.
just kinda makes me want a tm26 or tk75 instead since it was pretty close and at a smaller size.
i was impressed when it was the sr90 vs rc40 though!

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155
blueb8llz wrote:
DENGOH wrote:
No!!!! Throw about the same with TK70. I must buy RC40. I like the design and its big size though Smile But the battery indicator kind of copying Olight SR series. But charging indicator is different though.

are you saying that this rc40 throws the same as the tk70? if so, i have to get a rc40 also! thats assuming the rc40 is floodier than the tk70 right?

I heard somewhere in the video Patriot mention both of them throw about the same.
Definitely RC40 throw better than TK75, so should be very close to TK70. And with shorter battery tube, and floodier, looks good to me.

cool i'll see you when you get there

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155
blueb8llz wrote:
just watched the beamshot video, was expecting to see a tk70 comparison at the end, but nope. now its hard for me to make my decision, i had a tk70 so seeing the beams together and seeing what the differences are, would have helped. but now, it didnt really impress me when it went against the tm26 and tk75. just kinda makes me want a tm26 or tk75 instead since it was pretty close and at a smaller size. i was impressed when it was the sr90 vs rc40 though!

I see huge difference between TK75 and RC40 beamshots in the video. Maybe you have different and higher expectation for RC40.

cool i'll see you when you get there

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155

Below is RC40 top vs TK75 bottom beamshots at 100m I cut from the video. For 100m, I consider it is big differences. It is very subjective to different people different expectation though.

cool i'll see you when you get there

herosemblem
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 4 months ago
Joined: 03/02/2013 - 01:08
Posts: 18
Location: California

Dengoh, you are right about the brightness being very subjective. To you, the difference appears significant. To me…I hardly see any difference.
I believe the difference is more pronounced in-person, though.

DENGOH
DENGOH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 21 hours ago
Joined: 10/06/2012 - 05:26
Posts: 2155

LCD monitor is another factor.

cool i'll see you when you get there

Spasmod
Spasmod's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 5 months ago
Joined: 12/29/2012 - 20:17
Posts: 508
Location: UK West Country

This might help to emphasize the difference more clearly

Mouse out RC40 - Mouse over TK75

Pages