Review: Fenix TK41

53 posts / 0 new
Last post

Pages

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962
Review: Fenix TK41

The Fenix TK41 is a very powerful flashlight.

trooplewis was gracious enough to let me play with his new TK41 for a few days so, I thought I might put down a few thoughts/observations about this fantastic torch.

The bottom line for non-fans of Foy:  The Fenix TK41 is a superb multi-function XM-L flashlight from a respected manufacturer.  This high performance light not only dazzles with blinding output but it inspires user confidence in a way that some lesser "brands" simply cannot match.  It is unbelievably bright, has a friendly UI and fits the large hands of this humble scribe better than any P60 ever could.  It takes readily available AA batteries (8) and will even operate with 4 batteries if that's all you have.  The side switch location is superior, fit and finish is top drawer and to my eyes, it is an aesthetically handsome flashlight.  The price of the Fenix TK41 is prohibitive only for those for whom there is no economic justification.  When this quality flashlight is still making daylight out of dark twenty years from now, I doubt you'll be complaining that you spent too much.

What I like:

- output (throw, flood - when you turn it on, light happens . . .everywhere)

- side-switch

- comfortably fat body to grab

- UI

- run time (if Fenix's estimates are correct)

- square tail cap threads

- good looks

What I do not like:

- emitter not centered

- battery magazine rattle

- anti-roll bezel allows too much roll

- AWOL SOS  (possibly reviewer error)

- it's not mine

Fenix TK41 Cree XM-L Dual Switch Multi-Function Flashlight from Manafont

http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/fenix-cree-xml-tk41-6mode-800lumen-472meter-light-distance-led-flashlight-8aa-p-6483 

emitter: Cree XM-L (T6?)

modes: 6-mode with memory - low (10 lumens) mid (108 lumens) high (335 lumens) turbo (800 lumens) strobe and SOS*

power source: 8 AA batteries  (will operate on 4, 6 or 8 batteries)

switch: 2 soft rubber buttons on flashlight tube just below head, power button on right, mode selection on left

lens: coated glass

water proof rating: IPX-8  (did not follow Foy water test protocol because it's not Foy's light - remember the Yezl!) <<update - passed with flying colors, see below>>

ordering experience: troop says it took about 12 days to arrive

digitally regulated

reverse polarity protection

type III hard anodization

will tail-stand

price: $110

*Fenix provided specs

exterior temperatures: (after 26 minutes on high)

degrees fahrenheit

103° - side of bezel

107° - above top fin

112° - between top and middle fin

105° - base of head

103° - top of knurling

97° - bottom of knurling

94° - side of tail cap

Instead of providing amps draw here, I'll just show how the TK41 comes.  Because of the battery magazine/contact configuration I would have had to figure out some alternate method of measuring amps, perhaps involving alligator clips or something.  Also, I fear the (admittedly slight) possibility of frying the driver/circuitry.  Remember; this is not my flashlight.

The plastic case has handy handles on top and even more handy specs on the back.  My wife made the observation that I looked like a complete idiot while carrying the TK41 using these handles.  From her reaction (uncontrolled laughter) I would have concluded the case may be a bit over engineered until I noticed the following . . .

troop says he can't remember seeing this crack yet it was the very first thing I noticed.  I've been careful to the point of paranoia with this flashlight and can only truthfully say that it came to me like this.  (gonna put a few drops of super glue in there, fix it right up)

Features/Value

Even at $110, I happen to believe the Fenix TK41 offers a lot of useful features for the money.  Unless you're oddly committed to overhand use/carry, the side switch just makes too much sense.  This is where your thumb is; this is where the switch should be and with the TK41, you get two that let you choose from six different modes.  I could only find five of them.  I tried for 10 minutes, cycling with differing rapidity and all I discovered was the flashing strobe when I double clicked the power button.  The light comes on when releasing the button after pressing so, it could be called a reverse clicky but it feels like an electronic switch.  It has mode memory and goes from low, mid, high and turbo.

Other features include large cooling fins, if indeed that's what they are.  If not they still look cool and as you can see, aluminum machining and lathe work is superb.

Fenix calls this "Rhombic Knurling" and I've grown quite fond of it.  I think it affords better purchase than traditionally aggressive knurling, besides looking awesome.

One slight flaw that doesn't seem to effect performance is the un-centered emitter.  The bezel and everything inside appear to be glued/sealed so, access may be difficult.  Didn't notice until now but the reflector is not completely smooth.  Interesting.

Tail cap threads are square and feel very nice.

This is the base of the head and appears to be the underside of the driver.  The contact springs on the battery magazine flex/press against the center and outer brass. (or whatever it is)

Another interesting thing is what looks to be a cut-out at the top of the threads on the head.  On this side it looks somewhat intentional . . .

. . . this side looks almost like it was bitten off.  Only thing I can figure is it provides access to grasp the bottom of the driver/circuitry assembly.

On the left is the bottom of the battery magazine and you can see where the inside of the tail-cap turns/presses against it.

This is the top of the battery magazine.  You can see how the outer contact springs flex against the contact areas of the head.  Don't snag these little guys on your woolen afghan, grandma!

With prior authorization from troop, the TK41 entered the shower with Foy to undergo dynamic testing, i.e., cycling through all modes with water spraying directly on all joints/power switches.  This was followed by static underwater testing in the dreaded "depth-sink."

 No ingress of any kind was noted.

 

When I get the last flashlight I'm expecting, I'm planning a thrower shootout that (hopefully) will include the TK41.  Until then, my lame ceiling bounce/uglywall beam shots will have to do.

All shots inside and out were taken at 1/4 second shutter speed @ f2.8.  The comparison lights this evening are the Ultra Fire UF-980L and a Solarforce L2i sporting a 3-mode MC-E drop-in.

First is the L2i/MC-E on my woefully un-hip kitchen table.

Next, the UF-980L.

Now the TK41.  Notice also, I bumped the DMM when I stood up with the 980L.

In this comparison the TK41 appears to slaughter the other two lights rather decisively.  Let's see what happens outside.  The cactus plant is 55 feet away and there was a bright moon overhead.

First the L2i/MC-E.

The 980L.

And finally, the TK41.

As you can see, the TK41 blinds the cactus trunk into invisibility - something the 980L doesn't seem capable of doing.  This is what I mean when I say the TK41 is blindingly bright.  Besides being enormous, the hot spot is intensely bright and the spill seems to be everywhere.  When you turn this bad boy on, light happens. 

It's as simple as that and when I show how well it throws, you'll understand how impressive the Fenix TK41 really is.

I apologize for the lack of proper shots showing throw.  These are coming when I do the shootout.

overandoutFoy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

Edited by: Anonymous (not verified) on 08/23/2012 - 16:14
2100
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 3 months ago
Joined: 05/28/2011 - 10:28
Posts: 4179

Nice.  The TK41 has a 62mm front bezel (not sure what reflector size). That's 20mm bigger than the 980L.  Its supposed to throw better by concentrating the beam into a smaller and more intense spot.

That said, check out my U80 beamshots vs the 980L (in the 18650 forum). The U-80 has a smaller hotspot, even though both are of the same dia reflector.

The spill (ie raw unreflectored output) of the UF-980L seems to be very slightly brighter than the TK41 though. 

The dyanmic range of a camera's CCD/CMOS is pretty narrow compared to our eyes.  I can see a difference in personl albeit small, but my pictures do not show it as much.  But larger differences will show.

okwchin
okwchin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Joined: 01/07/2011 - 04:41
Posts: 1103

And comparatively speaking, the TK41 outthrows my Legion, but the TK41 is slightly out-thrown by the V3 catapult.

The width of the spill however makes the TK41 a VERY impressive light, and IMO the best throwy light to be carrying. The narrow "throw orientated" catapult and legion reflectors narrow the spill down to a claustrophobic level. (beam wise, the catapult is similar to the TK41, the legion is more like a TK35)

 

AWesome review! Love the pics!

"like everyone else - I’m looking for my next “last” flashlight" -  ohnonothimagain

raccoon city
raccoon city's picture
Online
Last seen: 3 min 19 sec ago
Joined: 10/06/2010 - 02:35
Posts: 6385

So far, great review and awesome pics!  

keepupthegoodworkFoy

Match
Match's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: 11/14/2010 - 11:57
Posts: 1468

Very nice.  I'd like to run all those through my I.S. just to see what numbers they'll put down.

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

Nice photos and review, Foy, glad you like the light. It has a couple flaws, but they do not seem to affect performance so I've been pretty happy with it. My cost justification for it is, well hey, it's just about the price of one tank of gas, or about what someone might pay for a new pair of decent shoes. So I buy cheap shoes and one nice light...

I do like the traditional size and feel of the light, it is about the size of the old Ray-O-Vac in your avatar. Not as big as a Maglite, but nice heft and feel.

That bright stuff that looks like the bottom of the pill I believe is actually gold-plated contact points. One review said that after much use the sharp springy things on top of the batter holder actually wear off the gold. I noticed the "ringy" SMO reflector; not sure if that was intentional to avoid ringy beams, or just a result of the mfg process. Some owners complained about a dark donut hole in the hotspot, but my light does not seem to have that. Perhaps the off-center emitter avoids the donut hole.

I'm curious what you thought of the beam tint. Some TK35 owners had very green tinted beams, and that was a concern with the TK41. I'm a bit color blind, but the beam looks pretty pure white to me, what do your eyes say?

Feel free to give it the Foy waterproof tests, it should do fine. If it fails, you can ship it back to Fenix instead of back to me!

Have fun with the TK, looking forward to the shootout!

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

Match
Match's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: 11/14/2010 - 11:57
Posts: 1468

Btw, what other light are you waiting on for this shoot-out?  If you're interested, I may have a late entrant (I'll stick with 1x18650 and 1xXM-L to keep things close).  Final testing on my end will take place tonight to see if it's even worth entering it.

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

I'm waiting on the F15. 

It was Sir John (I think) <<nope, it was JohnnyMac>> and his F15 review (and my big mouth) that got me lassoed into this shootout.  troop wanted to see how the TK41 would do . . . and so do I.

Our property at work is about 1.5 acres and it's all enclosed/gated because we keep any number of pricey Detroit iron.  (inside and some less nice outside) It also affords me the perfect opportunity to do a throw comparison in an environment large enough, quiet/alone, etc. where I can take my time.  There are lots of targets back there at different ranges so, it should be ideal.

Match - An integrating sphere is something I so very badly need.  On most lights I can extrapolate lumens from amps drawn (not the TK41 unfortunately) but of course that often has little or nothing to do with actual output.  I've got a lot of irons in the fire right now but as soon as I resolve my latest pressing issue, I'm going to attempt your IS build.  All comers are welcome so . . . . would be happy to accommodate any way I can.

Foy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

As for tint - it's definitely got some green going on under certain conditions.  Maybe slightly less than my Solarforce T6 drop-ins, which are the most green XM-Ls I have and to be sure, it's really not that green at all, especially outside, where this light most likely will be used.  You don't see the slight ringyness out there either.

Foy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

Marc999
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 06/07/2011 - 13:43
Posts: 46

Interesting review, yet how does a $100+ flashlight fit into "where frugal meets with flashlight" slogan of this website? 

Davx
Davx's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 03/17/2011 - 20:29
Posts: 895

Nice review and great pics.. As usual! Thanks Foy.

"There are always new jobs, women, and apartments......there is only ONE BLF." - Chicago X (27/03/2012)

jamesearljonesi...
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 2 hours ago
Joined: 03/16/2011 - 00:02
Posts: 955

Marc999 wrote:

Interesting review, yet how does a $100+ flashlight fit into "where frugal meets with flashlight" slogan of this website? 

There is nothing wrong with indulging on >$100 flashlight. Everyone is welcome here at BLF. If you've noticed the rest of the site a lot of it is about budget lights but every now and then members purchase a light that is not so budget. 

 

Great review and pics Foy!

waiting on that shootout.

okwchin
okwchin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Joined: 01/07/2011 - 04:41
Posts: 1103

Tint of the TK41 I've seen is a nice clean white.

 

 

 

 

"like everyone else - I’m looking for my next “last” flashlight" -  ohnonothimagain

SirJohn
SirJohn's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 6 months ago
Joined: 09/28/2010 - 10:12
Posts: 459

Flashlight Foy wrote:

It was Sir John (I think) and his F15 review (and my big mouth) that got me lassoed into this shootout.  troop wanted to see how the TK41 would do . . . and so do I.

 

I'd love to take credit for it, but it was actually JohnnyMac. Looking forward to the shootout.

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

+1 Be Seen  (laughing)

I thought the "it-ain't-budget" comment would have showed up a lot sooner and to be sure, it's a valid gripe on board with the word "budget" in it.  I could argue also that budget can be quite relative.  Saying a $100 torch does not belong here implies $100 is over the "budget" threshold.  Since no line has ever been drawn, I can correctly say the TK41 is a budget light.  It is inexpensive compared to an Olight Intimidator and I promise you, if someone sends me an SR90 for review, I will review it on Budget Light Forum.

causethatshowIrollFoy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

Oh damn!!

Sorry, it was JohnnyMac.

mybadFoy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

Huny74
Huny74's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 9 months ago
Joined: 09/22/2010 - 15:38
Posts: 466

Thanks again, Foy!

Every time I read a review by you a smile is slowly building up on my face becoming more distinct the more I read and with every picture I look at anticipation and excitement is added to that. All resulting in: Now I want a TK41, too!

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

I agree that $110 is probably not what you would call a budget light, but it also depends on your perspective. I had a guy arguing with me on CPF that the Fenix models were the "Fords" of the flashlight world. 

If you go here, you will think $110 is a bargain, I think the cheapest light on this site is $203, and I would take the TK41 over them any day.

http://www.oveready.com/

Besides that, there are folks here who have more than a hundred bucks invested in, say, multiple purchases of the same AA light...and I know a lot of folks here own some Fenix lights, so where should we draw the line?

And lastly, I'd rather have Foy review a light if I was thinking about getting it, than some guy over at that other place. In fact, I find most of the guys who review lights here more informative than the reviews elsewhere.

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

fishinfool
fishinfool's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 11 hours ago
Joined: 03/09/2010 - 00:30
Posts: 4261

AnotherawesomereviewthereFoy!  

 

Don wrote:

"But as I said long ago, you are more likely to be killed by a dead fish dropped by a seagull in the Sahara Desert than by a lithium ion

ZW99GT
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: 06/08/2011 - 10:52
Posts: 173

Great review! The beamshot on the cactus is awesome! I believe this may be my next light.

dorpmuller
dorpmuller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 3 days ago
Joined: 10/20/2010 - 18:29
Posts: 837

Flashlight Foy wrote:

As for tint - it's definitely got some green going on under certain conditions.  Maybe slightly less than my Solarforce T6 drop-ins, which are the most green XM-Ls I have and to be sure, it's really not that green at all, especially outside, where this light most likely will be used.  You don't see the slight ringyness out there either.

Foy

Nice review but that's what has put me off Fenix... my TK45 is horrible green compared to my other lights. 41 is a great looking light though!

Rich

"I am the flashlight king! I can light anything!"

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

I updated to include water testing.  No ingress at all under spraying water or in the sink.

Foy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

2100
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 3 months ago
Joined: 05/28/2011 - 10:28
Posts: 4179

Marc999 wrote:

Interesting review, yet how does a $100+ flashlight fit into "where frugal meets with flashlight" slogan of this website?

Budget is all relative I guess.  Def of budget - reasonably priced.  8 x AA form factor (haven't seen this from the usual budget MIC brands). It is not a small flashlight, there is a lot of aluminum and its built is good.  Equivalently sized in the MIC world would cost at least $60-80.

My Lightpipe LP-250NS costed me $425. It has risen to 550 now. Shipping alone costed me the price of this TK41! It has a 5mm arc length, 250W and able to sustain 45-50 mins of burn on its Li-ion.  If i go to the HID world of above 100 watts and on the ground of performance, that is budget. $425 can't even get you the parts alone shipped.

Another angle - the Yao's 35/80W MIC clone (55W for the clone) costs $52 and 32 shipping via EMS to here. That's $84. We take it as 45-50W coz auto HIDs always get underspec-ed. We need 5 lights to equal the LP-250NS. $d84 * 5 = $420.  And that is using a small 5.5AH SLA, not Li-ion.  In that sense, it is already on a budget.

 

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

When I insert pictures in my reviews, I just right click/copy from flickr and right click/paste where I want it to go.  If I use the tree symbol on BLF editor I get a small white box with an x in it when I copy the HTML code from flickr.  It just ain't happnin' fer me.

Foy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

photon1k
photon1k's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 months ago
Joined: 02/11/2011 - 23:29
Posts: 893

Marc999 wrote:

Interesting review, yet how does a $100+ flashlight fit into "where frugal meets with flashlight" slogan of this website? 

1) It's a slogan, not a rule.

2) While it's true that 'budget' lights are the primary focus of BLF, as others have pointed out, we all have different budgets.

3) Unlike another forum, this one has an open minded admin and as a result, it tends to attract mostly free thinking and open minded members. Witness the reasonable answers to your question. Imagine the response you might get elsewhere should you try posting a similar question there.Wink

 

@Foy, Not familiar with flickr's link types, but with imageshack I have to use what is called a 'direct link' instead of any of the several other kinds of links they offer. If Flickr gives you a choice of different links to the same photo, try the one described as 'direct'.

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

I use the "Direct Link" function on Photobucket to use the Tree-Symbol thingy here in BLF. It (the tree symbol) also gives you the mouseover option, which is a little tedious to use but useful.

Foy, Good to know it is H2O-proof, thanx.

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

JohnnyMac
JohnnyMac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 24 min ago
Joined: 04/12/2011 - 16:03
Posts: 8569

That light is pretty awesome. I can't believe how cool it stays after tailstanding on high! Would love to see the pill and internal heatsinking on this bad boy.

sb56637
sb56637's picture
Offline
Last seen: 31 min 27 sec ago
Joined: 01/08/2010 - 09:29
Posts: 5041

Very nice review Foy, as usual! Thanks a lot! We now have a Fenix review on the frontpage. Looks like a real beauty. Drop that price down to $30 and I'm all over it. :p That'll be the day!

Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

Thank you sb, I appreciate it.

Foy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

sb56637
sb56637's picture
Offline
Last seen: 31 min 27 sec ago
Joined: 01/08/2010 - 09:29
Posts: 5041

Marc999 wrote:

Interesting review, yet how does a $100+ flashlight fit into "where frugal meets with flashlight" slogan of this website? 

Interesting question too. I personally would never spend $100+ on a flashlight, but then again I am an incorrigible tightwad. Nevertheless, I do find these reviews of premium lights to be VERY interesting, and even more so when it comes from an enthusiast of budget lights. I think the comparisons are very useful. This Fenix is a real beauty, but I think the comparison beamshots show that the budget $22 - $40 XM-L models, while noticeably less bright, definitely hold their own against this premium product.

Again, thanks for the review Foy!

Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

sb56637
sb56637's picture
Offline
Last seen: 31 min 27 sec ago
Joined: 01/08/2010 - 09:29
Posts: 5041

And one niggle: Why couldn't they make the Fenix TK41 label line up axially with the two switch buttons? That would drive me crazy every time I look at it.

Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

sb56637
sb56637's picture
Offline
Last seen: 31 min 27 sec ago
Joined: 01/08/2010 - 09:29
Posts: 5041

Ah, and a big thanks to trooplewis for kindly loning out your light for review!

Budget Light Forum ...where Frugal meets with Flashlight!

Don
Don's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 8 months ago
Joined: 01/12/2010 - 16:32
Posts: 6502

That has to be one of the most positive negatives about anything.

 

"What I don't like about it"

"It isn't mine" Smile

 

Do we see one of these in your future?

Smile

 

The numbers from my light tests are always to be found here.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApkFM37n_QnRdDU5MDNzOURjYllmZHI...

Foy
Foy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 2 days ago
Joined: 01/02/2011 - 17:56
Posts: 2962

No, not in my immediate future anyway.  I'm not above spending a little if I happen to have it at the time (which isn't very often any more) but my days of pricey torches are probably behind me for the most part.  That's why I jumped at troop's offer to review it.  The "Budget" part of BLF seems to suit me economically quite well.

decliningincomeFoy

No referral links and nothing embedded . . . ever.

                      &nbsp

hmm
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 6 months ago
Joined: 06/15/2011 - 02:24
Posts: 8

Can you talk about the benefits/negatives compared to the TK35? From what I gather, it's a great thrower, physically intimidating and uses more common AA batteries, but is less compact, doesn't have a clicky and more unwieldy.

okwchin
okwchin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Joined: 01/07/2011 - 04:41
Posts: 1103

In Short..

Pros

  • Very throwy - as good as a catapult V3
  • Side switch - comfortable grip for a torch of this size
  • Really good tailstanding
Cons
  • More throwy, but somewhat less suited for illumination of short-mid distance (doesn't have a very usable corona, tight hotspot
Subjective
  • Aesthetics - I prefer the look of the TK35, TK41 is practical and nice to hold
  • Uses AA - depends on what you normally use,  NiMH or LiIon
  • UI is the same between the two - great UI IMO
  • Beam tint is typical XM-L not excessively cool, but still a cool white.

"like everyone else - I’m looking for my next “last” flashlight" -  ohnonothimagain

SirJohn
SirJohn's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 6 months ago
Joined: 09/28/2010 - 10:12
Posts: 459

Its interesting that the the new TK60 is $10 cheaper than the TK41. The head and electronics look to be the same. The output is the same (technically the tk60 is speced virtually imperceptibly better) Perhaps its the result of not having to engineer the battery carrier? The Tk60 is huge with 4 d cells but you do get more run time. I wonder how well it would run with AA nimhs in d cell adapters. Do D cell nimhs handle high current draw better than AA's or is the only difference capacity? If you want a huge light, the Tk60 is an alternative to the TK41. Curious to see how the Tk70 comes out. It esentially takes the tk60 body and mates a jumbo head on it with 3xXM-L.

okwchin
okwchin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Joined: 01/07/2011 - 04:41
Posts: 1103

I think AAs are the better engineered battery because they are used more often. Even though 4xAA uses less volume than 1 D cell, you can get a similar capacity (about 8800mA from 4xAA Turnigy LSDs) while a D cell can be up to 10000mA but not guaranteed.

I believe if you can get your hands on 4x AA parallel adapters or even make your own, it should be pretty straightforward. 4xAA is bigger than a D cell alone, without any carrier frames, and the TK41 has a bit of battery carrier wobble while it was in the body, so there should be enough room for slightly bigger carriers too. Unless they used a narrower internal dimension on the TK60.

"like everyone else - I’m looking for my next “last” flashlight" -  ohnonothimagain

flame2000
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 2 months ago
Joined: 06/02/2011 - 10:51
Posts: 101

Hi Foy, did you try measuring the standby/parasitic drain of this TK41 (assuming you still have this with you :))?

I read somewhere the previous TK40 had a higher than average drain of ~400uA and would be completely flat in ~1.1year without lockout. Not a good choice for an emergency light.

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

A guy on CPF had the same concern, but measured the TK 41 and got this;

TK41 the parasitic drain is 0.053 mA or 53 micro amps which is hardly anything , the TK40 was 0.400 mA

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

notsurefire
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 1 month ago
Joined: 12/31/2011 - 09:20
Posts: 1

FIRST THANKS FOR THE GREAT REVIEW , I STUMBLED ON THS SIGHT IN A DEBATE OVER THE TK35 OR TK41 STILL ON THE FENCE .....ALREADY OWN ABOUT HALF OF THE FENIX LINE WITCH INCLUDES 2 TK45'S BUT IM READY FOR THE NEXT HEAVY HITTER ......P.S. IT'S HARD TO BELIVE THAT PEOPLE HAVE THE AUDACITY TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD BUDGET AFTER ALL OF THE WORK YOU PUT INTO THESE REVIEWS, I FIND THEM VERY HELPFUL SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH

ILIKEFLASHLIGHTS
ILIKEFLASHLIGHTS's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 9 months ago
Joined: 08/04/2011 - 23:47
Posts: 5656

That is one great review right there done by a classy guy that tells it like it is.  That's why I love the guy.  Laughing

The TK41 from what I have seen watching videos is probably one of the better XM-L throwers out there and that's going against Catapult V3, Olight M3X or Crelant 7G5.  It's got a super tight hotspot that is super bright as well.  It's definately built to be a thrower and it does that indeed. 

357Nut
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 8 months ago
Joined: 01/17/2012 - 22:33
Posts: 16

I didn't see any current draw listed so here are what I read with my new TK41.

Lo - 22ma

Med - 188ma

Hi - 678ma

Turbo - 2379ma

The voltage across the battery pack was 5.41v at those readings.  I mention this because at 5.14v across the pack current had climbed to 2655ma.

This should give everybody enough information to guesstimate runtimes.  Keep in mind that current is split between two different banks of batteries so each battery is only delivering half of that current. 

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

357Nut wrote:

I didn't see any current draw listed so here are what I read with my new TK41.

Lo - 22ma

Med - 188ma

Hi - 678ma

Turbo - 2379ma

The voltage across the battery pack was 5.41v at those readings.  I mention this because at 5.14v across the pack current had climbed to 2655ma.

This should give everybody enough information to guesstimate runtimes.  Keep in mind that current is split between two different banks of batteries so each battery is only delivering half of that current. 

So what would you guesstimate runtimes to be on Alkalines/Eneloops?

I find it pretty interesting that on "high" the Tk41 only pulls .68A

The light output on high seems to be about equivalent to an XM-L P60 on high, which is typically pulling 2.0A or more. AMazing what a good reflector can do.

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

ezeqdb
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 8 months ago
Joined: 10/28/2010 - 23:33
Posts: 264

trooplewis wrote:

A guy on CPF had the same concern, but measured the TK 41 and got this;

TK41 the parasitic drain is 0.053 mA or 53 micro amps which is hardly anything , the TK40 was 0.400 mA

For emergency use, you can unscrew the tailcap a bit.. and have 0 parasitic drain.

"no le temo a la oscuridad, la oscuridad me teme a mí"

357Nut
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 8 months ago
Joined: 01/17/2012 - 22:33
Posts: 16

Fresh off the charger Eneloops have about 1825-1850mah capacity at that draw.  They would also have higher voltage so initial current would be somewhat lower.  If we figured 2600ma draw as an average that would pull 1300mah from each battery giving you right around 1.5 hours of runtime on Turbo and 5.4 hours on high.

Alkalines are another animal all together.  You would only have full brightness for the first 5 minutes or so and then it would be on a steady decline.  Without doing runtime test it would be hard to say.

I'm not sure what batteries Fenix was using to get 2hrs 10mins on turbo but even is we figured our current draw to average 2400ma which seems unlikely with my readings you would still need true 2600mah batteries to do it.  At that current draw (1.2amps for each battery) I haven't seen them.

Still one of my favorite lights.

Rezolution
Rezolution's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 months 1 week ago
Joined: 10/04/2011 - 13:57
Posts: 537

So what's the best place to buy a TK41 these days?  I can't find it on Manafont any more...

ILIKEFLASHLIGHTS
ILIKEFLASHLIGHTS's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 9 months ago
Joined: 08/04/2011 - 23:47
Posts: 5656

I will add this has become my favorite flashlight.

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

Buy it from a reputable seller on Ebay; several are US-based and you will get it faster than from MF.

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

Trancersteve
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 3 months ago
Joined: 11/02/2010 - 06:39
Posts: 135

I'm very tempted to buy the TK41 next month, it would be my first Fenix.

I used to be a AA powered light guy only. Early last year after diving into 18650 lithium ion powered lights, I have found myself looking at multi AA powered lights, such as the TK41 in a different light (ha).

They are cell hogs. I wouldn't like to carry too many spares around for this light. 2 hours runtime in turbo and it's time to find yourself another 8 cells (!). I know it can run on 4 cells, but we wouldn't want to feed it only 4, unless we really had no choice. High runtime is great though, over 7 hours fantastic!

Now, my feelings on this are purely because I have been spoilt with the high energy that lithium ion cells offer. 1x18650 = 3 to 4xAA

A couple of years ago I took with me an 8xAA powered light on a camping trip, it wasn't ideal. It only had one mode and wasn't very efficient (was the 5mm LED can't remember the amount of emitters maglite shower head), but having to charge up 8 cells, handling those 8 cells and carrying around spare sets was an annoyance.

It's left me thinking if the TK41 really is a wise buy for me.

I wear my sunglasses at night.

trooplewis
trooplewis's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 03/26/2011 - 15:35
Posts: 2590

BTW, thought I should mention this.

Get a 1/2" split-ring and attach it to the lanyard hole on the TK41. Then get one of your BLF-Edition lanyards that were offered a few months ago with the BLF-Tank007 clone (you did buy extras, right?) and clip it to the ring. Perfect fit, hangs all the way down, but doesn't bunch up when the light is standing on the head. Looks better than the stock lanyard IMO as well.

Still tail-stands, but a bit wobbly.

Rats, finally sold my 2010 509hp Mustang...now I can buy more lights!

Sold the red one too! Now guess what I drive, doing my penance for 500 hp commuters...

http://dreammustang.com/

http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac47/Ha

Pages