Edit 2017 April:
I came to the conclusion to NOT call them 5th generation AA standard, but 4th gen updated. See http://eneloop101.com/batteries/how-to-distinguish-the-different-generations/ for the explanation why!
Also the PRO are currently at the 5th gen, when just looking at the Coding. Not the specs.
Unfortunately Panasonic has been a little inconsistent/confusing with their coding.
Almost to the point I am reluctant to appoint certain eneloop "generations" to certain codes.
2 examples:
BK-3MCC was originally the code for the 4th generation eneloops produced in Japan in 2013. But the Chinese made eneloops also use this BK-3MCC code
Before that, there was the eneloop XX, coded HR-3UWX. Suddenly the HR-3UWXA showed up in certain areas, but never in Japan, and still had the exact same specs. So they were still 1st gen, but for the sake of clarity I called them 2nd gen in my overviews.
My feeling was that only cells produced and available in Japan would qualify for a "new generation"
1. now that eneloop America and Europe started to show 10years shelf life on the standard white eneloops, instead of 5 year shelf life, but still with the same coding, I`m not sure whether I should call them 5th generation?
(Panasonic Japan only updated the rated capacity a few weeks ago, for 1 year to 90%, and doesnt even mention anything about a 10-year shelf life)
2.Why I almost would like them to be called 5th gen, is that the PRO version now (in Europe)(not in Japan) have actually different specs, the AA version is now min. 2500mAh (formerly 2450) and the AAA version is now min. 930mAh (formerly 900) So they could be called the 5th generation....
They are now called BK-3HCDE for the AA batteries and BK-4HCDE for AAA.
Would it be wise to start calling these PRO 5th generation?
And should I call the 10-year shelf life "standard eneloops" also 5th generation?
I ask these question because I need to update the Eneloop 2005-2015 thread.
See my sig.