Luxeon V

14 posts / 0 new
Last post
djozz
djozz's picture
Online
Last seen: 8 min 23 sec ago
Joined: 09/07/2012 - 17:04
Posts: 10366
Location: Amsterdam
Luxeon V

It is a long time since Lumileds released an interesting emitter for flashlight use, but the new Luxeon V looks really promising:

*single chip
*4×4mm, but what looks to be a XP footprint (!)
*4800 mA maximum drive current, at which current 1700 lumen is produced (!)
*0.8 degC/W thermal resistance (!!! Shocked )

I would not mind testing one on a DTP-board Smile

Link to Lumileds page

Datasheet

Edited by: djozz on 08/09/2017 - 18:41
AlexGT
AlexGT's picture
Offline
Last seen: 15 hours 7 min ago
Joined: 06/07/2012 - 17:39
Posts: 2986
Location: Texas

Weird that they didn’t change the nomenclature for this chip since the 2005

Jensen567
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 04/10/2017 - 16:59
Posts: 306
Location: MD/DC Area USA

2.84Vf typical is a good sign that this is a new generation low Vf emitter. Hopefully someone starts carrying these.

Lexel
Lexel's picture
Online
Last seen: 1 min 1 sec ago
Joined: 11/01/2016 - 08:00
Posts: 2124
Location: Germany

interesting LEDs

they would work with 4S LEDs at 3S Battery in DD
or a decent 1S Buck driver

Lightbringer
Lightbringer's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 08/30/2016 - 14:12
Posts: 1999
Location: nyc

Lexel wrote:
interesting LEDs

they would work with 4S LEDs at 3S Battery in DD
or a decent 1S Buck driver

My F13s would love these…

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

alphazeta
alphazeta's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 59 min ago
Joined: 11/03/2013 - 11:50
Posts: 504
Location: NYC

“…4800 mA maximum drive current…” -> that’s only on paper so wow, that is pretty interesting. I’m interested in seeing how hard it can be driven…

Ford Prefect
Ford Prefect's picture
Offline
Last seen: 20 min 59 sec ago
Joined: 06/13/2011 - 08:07
Posts: 778
Location: Canada, eh!

Very interesting emitter. Hadn’t even thought about luxeons for years.

Thx for the link.

rizky_p
rizky_p's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 36 min ago
Joined: 03/01/2011 - 05:06
Posts: 452
Location: Indonesia

lol i thought you are revering to the old Luxeon V the naming is odd right? should have called it Luxeon V.II or something. Still have my old Luxeon III on 2AA and and Luxeon V on 2xICR123 which i never used now.

MRsDNF
MRsDNF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 47 min ago
Joined: 12/22/2011 - 21:18
Posts: 11146
Location: A light beam away from the missus in the land of Aus.
djozz wrote:
I would not mind testing one on a DTP-board.

I wouldn’t mind reading your test results. Smile

My current and or voltage measurements are only relevent to anything that I measure.

Budget light hobby proudly sponsored by my Mastercard and unknowingly paid for by a hard working wife. 

djozz said "it came with chinese lettering that is chinese to me".

old4570 said "I'm not an expert , so don't suffer from any such technical restrictions".

Old-Lumens. Highly admired and cherished member of Budget Light Forum. 11.5.2011 - 20.12.16. RIP.

 

Ollie
Online
Last seen: 14 min 12 sec ago
Joined: 05/30/2017 - 23:34
Posts: 199

Lexel,

That won't work too well 4s-3s. The XHP 70.2 12V on the seat beside me is powered by 4 26650s.
When the light was a 50.2 12V, I first tried 3 batteries. It did turn on, but only pulled 0.5A or so. My
later 50.2 6Vs are powered by 2 26650s. Based upon that, if I were to do a DD build, I would do 2s2p
and 2 26650s. That's how I did my quad XM-Ls years ago.

Ollie

battery
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 14 hours ago
Joined: 07/13/2014 - 15:39
Posts: 53

More fodder for the D4?

Texlite
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 11 hours ago
Joined: 06/23/2014 - 00:37
Posts: 192
AlexGT wrote:
Weird that they didn’t change the nomenclature for this chip since the 2005

Weird indeed.

Cool find djozz.

JaredM
JaredM's picture
Offline
Last seen: 19 min 58 sec ago
Joined: 10/31/2011 - 13:33
Posts: 407
Location: Donegal, Pennsylvania (SW)

Very interesting!

 

I'm thinking it's not going to perform up to it's potential on an XP footprint. First off, it'll be tricky getting it reflowed and not shorting. (If carefully centered it should work fine.) The XP thermal pad is only 60% as wide as the Luxeon. So I'm curious how much that'll diminish its performance. 

For a package that is ~33% larger than the XP, it's rated wattage is only about 20% greater than the XHP35. Efficacy is similar to a typical top binned HD at 85*C. If that exceptionally low thermal resistance is to be believed then there should be major overdriving capabilities here. My guess is peak output at ~12A. This maybe the closest thing we will see to an 'XM-L3'. Though, on that topic, the XP-L2 and XHP-50.2 kinda cover those bases well enough already.

 

But considering it's likely not a good dedome candidate, and that the rated-wattage-window efficacy and peak output are so similar to an XHP35 HD, AND that the new footprint requires new DTP boards, I don't see this LED becoming very impactful UNLESS there are some Nichia rivaling HiCRI versions offered. Right now I see it as a better XP-L2 or 3V XHP35 HD.

 

 

djozz
djozz's picture
Online
Last seen: 8 min 23 sec ago
Joined: 09/07/2012 - 17:04
Posts: 10366
Location: Amsterdam

The Luxeon V solder pad area (3.5 × 3.85) is closer to XP than the Oslons, so at first thought I do not expect performance problems from that.