The Shower Test - can you spot PWM?

71 posts / 0 new
Last post

Pages

ToyKeeper
ToyKeeper's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 01/12/2013 - 14:40
Posts: 9628
Location: (469219) 2016 HO3
The Shower Test - can you spot PWM?
A. Left=PWM, Right=PWM
62% (53 votes)
B. Left=PWM, Right=Constant
12% (10 votes)
C. Left=Constant, Right=PWM
18% (15 votes)
D. Left=Constant, Right=Constant
8% (7 votes)
Total votes: 85
ToyKeeper
ToyKeeper's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 01/12/2013 - 14:40
Posts: 9628
Location: (469219) 2016 HO3

I often hear people suggest the shower test as a way to detect whether a light uses PWM or if it delivers constant current. The test is: Shine the light at fast-moving water, like a shower head. Then look for dotted lines. If it has dots or spots, it uses PWM. If the streaks are smooth, it’s constant current.

But I find the test unreliable and error-prone. So I took some pictures of how this test looks in real life, and I want to know if people can determine the correct answer.

Here’s the pic. The poll choices refer to this picture:

Both lights were running at 30 lm, and both pictures used the same camera settings. Clicking the picture provides a larger version.

Edit: The answer is here.

ChrisGarrett
ChrisGarrett's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 02/12/2014 - 22:03
Posts: 537
Location: Miami, Florida

Neat! I voted CC for the left and PWM on the right.

Chris

Poguche
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 11/18/2018 - 10:23
Posts: 19
Location: Spain

I voted for both, as they have dotted lines that look very artificial to me.

Lexel
Lexel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 39 min ago
Joined: 11/01/2016 - 08:00
Posts: 5153
Location: Germany

did this a long time ago, like 1m below shower head its a lot better to see

with the right shutter speed you can even get very close to the PWM frequency with calculation of drops/shutter speed

djozz
djozz's picture
Online
Last seen: 5 min 24 sec ago
Joined: 09/07/2012 - 17:04
Posts: 15330
Location: Amsterdam

If the only light source on rhe shower has PWM you should see it in all water beams, not just in some. So in both pictures the shower is illuminated with a non-PWM light source, or too fast to even notice this way.

I guess..

Nice pic Lexel Smile

MtnDon
MtnDon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 08/27/2015 - 18:25
Posts: 2348
Location: Canuk in NM

I have trouble telling from that photo. I use a bicycle hanging in the garage; spin the front wheel and shine the light at the spokes. The bike is always there unless it is being ridden. If it’s being ridden I probably have little interest in checking PWM right then. Big Smile

BLF Member Map Add your name and location.

BurningPlayd0h
BurningPlayd0h's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 39 min ago
Joined: 06/22/2018 - 02:16
Posts: 564
Location: MN

For the poll would “PWM” be any at all, or PWM at a frequency slow enough for a human eye to see it?

ToyKeeper
ToyKeeper's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 01/12/2013 - 14:40
Posts: 9628
Location: (469219) 2016 HO3
BurningPlayd0h wrote:
For the poll would “PWM” be any at all, or PWM at a frequency slow enough for a human eye to see it?

Any PWM at all.

But, specifically, the kind which pulses on and off. Not the kind which stays on but does a square wave oscillation between two different levels.

DavidEF
DavidEF's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 52 min ago
Joined: 06/05/2014 - 06:00
Posts: 7220
Location: Salisbury, North Carolina, USA

I voted left=constant, right=pwm. But I’m really unsure.

The Cycle of Goodness: “No one prospers without rendering benefit to others”
- The YKK Philosophy

Relampago
Relampago's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 19 sec ago
Joined: 04/14/2019 - 11:44
Posts: 406

Norman Bates would know.

“Electricity is really just organized lightning”
― George Carlin

CREEXHP70LED
CREEXHP70LED's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 10 hours ago
Joined: 01/03/2019 - 13:16
Posts: 268

I think TK is playing a trick on us and one or both are not using PWM. I would normally say right and left is both PWM, but I think the trick is left is no PWM and right is PWM. Possibly no PWM at all.

 

 

 

Scallywag
Scallywag's picture
Offline
Last seen: 14 hours 36 min ago
Joined: 01/11/2018 - 22:23
Posts: 440
Location: Ohio, United States

I can't tell. I'd use a control picture as reference, and compare, if this were my test.

To test for visible PWM, I use a fan. After that, I use a camera with very short exposure time Wink

EDC Rotation: ZL SC62 | Jaxman E2L XP-G2 5A | Purple S2+ XPL-HI U6-3A | D4 w/ Luxeon V | RRT-01 
EagTac D25C Ti | DQG Slim AA Ti | UF-T1 by CRX | Olight S1 | Klarus Mini One Ti
L6 XHP70.2 P2 4000K FET+7135 | Jaxman M8 | MF02 | Jaxman Z1 CULNM1.TG | Blue S2+ w/ ML Special
In-progress: Supfire M6 3xXHP50.2 
Others: Nitecore EC23 | Nebo Twyst | Streamlight ProTac 1AA | TerraLux LightStar 100

pinkpanda3310
pinkpanda3310's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 24 min ago
Joined: 12/28/2013 - 08:45
Posts: 1984
Location: Perth

Streaks and dots in both pics to me Question

rookiedaddy
rookiedaddy's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 days 9 hours ago
Joined: 04/15/2016 - 21:42
Posts: 157

This…

ToyKeeper wrote:
…But I find the test unreliable and error-prone. …

It is.

I use the manual control on my camera/phone camera to check for any “flickering”, normally between 1/1000 to 1/2000 exposure the “flickering” will show clearly. I’m awfully sensitive to mid to low frequency “flickering”, even those that claims by some as “high-enough” or not PWM in its strict sense. For me, it doesn’t matter whether it’s On-Off or “Stay-On but does square wave”, as long as it’s not constant current, it’s being put to “flickering” category for me. Big Smile

still changing sig ::
Nicolicous
Nicolicous's picture
Online
Last seen: 8 min 20 sec ago
Joined: 04/16/2016 - 08:28
Posts: 1414
Location: Australia
pinkpanda3310 wrote:
Streaks and dots in both pics to me Question

yup both have PWM but the right pic is worst Smile

Nico -.-

pinkpanda3310
pinkpanda3310's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 24 min ago
Joined: 12/28/2013 - 08:45
Posts: 1984
Location: Perth

…and what about the streaks?

It’s like there’s 2 light sources. I get that the water droplets can move at different speeds which isn’t accurately represented with a still picture. But as pointed out by TK it seems like a pretty flawed test.

Nicolicous
Nicolicous's picture
Online
Last seen: 8 min 20 sec ago
Joined: 04/16/2016 - 08:28
Posts: 1414
Location: Australia

oh I didnt see that Silly

Nico -.-

SKV89
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 1 min ago
Joined: 12/10/2017 - 12:46
Posts: 2607
Location: US

I shine a light at my spinning usb fan to test for pwm. Works well

gchart
gchart's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 27 min ago
Joined: 03/19/2016 - 11:57
Posts: 1618
Location: Central IL

Is it just me, or is there a face in the water on the right side? Creepy! Shocked

CREEXHP70LED
CREEXHP70LED's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 10 hours ago
Joined: 01/03/2019 - 13:16
Posts: 268
gchart wrote:
Is it just me, or is there a face in the water on the right side? Creepy! Shocked

There is a face there for sure.

 

 

 

Lightbringer
Lightbringer's picture
Online
Last seen: 1 min 59 sec ago
Joined: 08/30/2016 - 14:12
Posts: 8490
Location: nyc

gchart wrote:
Is it just me, or is there a face in the water on the right side? Creepy! Shocked

Looks kinda like a caricature of Stan Laurel with his little hat.

Kind of a mirror-image of

 

Anyhoo, when I put my face close, stare at the image, and kinda go cross-eyed, I kinda see a 3D image of a swan.

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

BurningPlayd0h
BurningPlayd0h's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 39 min ago
Joined: 06/22/2018 - 02:16
Posts: 564
Location: MN

The dots in the second picture aren’t necessarily PWM, they just look like the “ripples” in a stream of water reflecting light at different angles to me.

wle
wle's picture
Offline
Last seen: 16 hours 28 min ago
Joined: 01/07/2015 - 13:49
Posts: 1208
Location: atlanta ga

all you have to do is wave your finger back and forth rapidly, in the beam

or point at a rotating ceiling fan

wle

BurningPlayd0h
BurningPlayd0h's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 39 min ago
Joined: 06/22/2018 - 02:16
Posts: 564
Location: MN

wle wrote:
all you have to do is wave your finger back and forth rapidly, in the beam

or point at a rotating ceiling fan

wle

There’s zero chance someone will be able to see 10kHz or faster PWM doing that.

fonfan
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 54 min ago
Joined: 08/13/2015 - 19:44
Posts: 217
Location: RF SPb

Fast movement of light source – the best PWM test.

WANTED Zebralights. My flashlights

wle
wle's picture
Offline
Last seen: 16 hours 28 min ago
Joined: 01/07/2015 - 13:49
Posts: 1208
Location: atlanta ga

BurningPlayd0h wrote:
wle wrote:
all you have to do is wave your finger back and forth rapidly, in the beam

or point at a rotating ceiling fan

wle

There’s zero chance someone will be able to see 10kHz or faster PWM doing that.

maybe but

a. at that frequency, isn;t it imperceptible?
b. would the shower test work for that, assuming PCM/no PCM matters at that frequency?

Relampago
Relampago's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 19 sec ago
Joined: 04/14/2019 - 11:44
Posts: 406

Ha ha. It was a trick question. She’s not even using a flashlight.

“Electricity is really just organized lightning”
― George Carlin

gchart
gchart's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 27 min ago
Joined: 03/19/2016 - 11:57
Posts: 1618
Location: Central IL

She’s screwing with us… “PWM” are the initials of the person whose face is on the right side Wink

CREEXHP70LED
CREEXHP70LED's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 10 hours ago
Joined: 01/03/2019 - 13:16
Posts: 268

Lol…..Selene is playing a game for sure… Big Smile

I just read her response. Sounds like both are PWM however, just at different frequencies or types…. Silly

 

 

 

ToyKeeper
ToyKeeper's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 01/12/2013 - 14:40
Posts: 9628
Location: (469219) 2016 HO3

… (this space intentionally blank, to put the answer at the top of page 2 instead of the bottom of page 1) …

Pages