Finally the XHP70.2 emerges!

[quote=Texas_Ace]

The 15A buck driver you developed is starting to make a lot more sense now. :wink:

You flashlight mad scientist!

Meh, it came as expected . there was so many naysayers saying it wont happen but knowing Cree , getting Xhp70.2 was only a matter of time and cost.

Now i plan to pop one into a Boss with 4x26650 16v DD on a beefy 50mm thick chunky heatsink to get a whopping ~10k lumens single emitter compact thrower worthy of a flasholic envy. :+1:

This is what i call ‘Pushing on the limits of existing technology’. Doing anything less would be better off going the way of buying a production light.Why bother……

sorry, i dont keep up with the topic
if i change all the XHP70 in my olight X7 to XHP70.2, how many lumens i will gain, and is it worth doing

Nobody has done tests yet.
It will also depend if you’re using a CC or DD driver.
If it’s CC then you will get an efficiency increase and probably very little additional lumens, if it’s DD you will get an efficiency decrease and much higher output.

Link to the driver?

:+1:

Vinh at Sky Lumen got a batch of these 70.2’s in and has already made a few 20k+ lumen monsters.

:+1:

Of course it’s CC driver
Currently it’s about 3000 lumen per xhp70, still not the maximum
I think if i change to ver 2, maybe i will reach 10k-11k lumen

Could you help? I m looking for 16 mm DTP mcpcb for xhp70 for 12 V and with isolated thermal pad.

IMO for 12V there is none. However there is one modified 16mm one for 6V only available here XHP70 6V 16mm DTP Copper MCPCB
But I think this process is not possible with the 12V pcb.

12V: http://kaidomain.com/p/S025183.16mm-Dia-x-1_5mm-T-12V-DTP-Copper-MCPCB-for-Cree-XHP70-2pcs
But what do you mean with isolated thermal pad? It is connected to the LED-Base directly.

6V is also aviable: http://kaidomain.com/p/S025182.16mm-Dia-x-1_5mm-T-6V-DTP-Copper-MCPCB-for-Cree-XHP70-2pcs

I mean isolated from - and +.
In mcpcb above thermal pad connected with - (or + it doesn’t matter)
In 6v version thermal pad is isolated but not a in 12v.

I does not know any mcpcb where the terminal pad is connected to LED+ or LED-.
Only some LEDs like Osram Oslon black flat have a connection between terminal Pad and LED-.

With DTP (direct termial path) the terminal pad can be connected to the flashlight body, which mostly is connected to battery-.
A connection of battery+ to the flashlight-body is very rare. I have made such a connection in a Skyray King with Nichia 144 LEDs, which do not have a terminal pad.

The diode contacts are not isolated from thermal pad, just look at image from kd. I want to use boost driver that require thermal pad to be isolated from driver out.

OK, now I know what your problem is.
… as it is written in the datasheet of XHP70: “Recommended PCB Solder Pad 12 V Configuration (thermal pad is connected to anode and cathode and is not electrically isolated)”

Than you need to do it yourselfs.

On the 6V Board, you can cut the traces in the middle of the + and - pads to connect the new pads among each other. That means, you will not need capton. You can use the “CREE” and “XHP70” scripting on the board to connect the new pads with a cable.

Interesting.
Still waiting for someone to test the XHP70, 20A without burning up and still making good output sounds impressive based on the rough tests a few posts ago.
If it can do 20+ A with less than 8.4v then it will probably do more than 0.5A with 12.6v in the 12v configuration.
Only tests will tell for sure :slight_smile:

I received a XHP70.2 from KD (P2 3B) yesterday and did a test with my usual method. I could not repeat the results of Tom and Kawi, the led maxed out at 12A (I measured 6600lm), above that the output slowly went down. I stopped the test at 15A. After cooling down I tried going directly to 15A and got 8000lm at start and 7000lm at 30 seconds. Considering that Tom got comparable numbers but out the front of a flashlight, so maybe 15% less compared to bare led lumens (which would be 9200lm and 8000lm), I’m on the low side of them.

I checked my reflow by unsoldering the led, and the led made good contact over the entire solder pads.

A very possible explanation for our differences could be my way of mounting. I think the (active, with a fan) cooling of my rig is good enough or at least as well as the flashlight builds of Tom and Kawiboy, but the (20mm) ledboard was not soldered on the heatsink, but screwed down tight with thin ArticSilver5 in between. With the close to 100W of heat to dissipate, this may be a limitation. When I have time I will solder the 20mm star onto a larger 3mm thick copper disc, and clamp that to my test-mount, so that the contact surface is way larger (more than 3 times). Then I will do the test again, and make a post about it.