Yes.
Correct.
The ratings match my usual keywords for ratings, I am working on a list to include.
Thank you. Rating in that manner makes it all very easy & clear for almost anyone to understand, as far as I am concerned. 
Excellent, just excellent! :+1:
Might you squeeze in the number of cells (where you have the number of slots)?
1,2,3,4
or
2,4
would be the possibilities, I think.
I find the chargers that only allow pairs to be really annoying, as so many things I find use three cells.
Not a bad idea, but the picture of each charger already shows the number of cell that can be used in it.
Strike that comment…. there is already a column for number of slots. Anything besides what is listed already would be clutter, IMHO.
I really do like the key to the rating system also KHJ. I like it better than using a “big smiley”… this makes it easier to understand I think.
Thank you.
I do not believe I can do that. I cannot see a good way to add that information to the list. I am not sure it will be a good idea to fill more information into the slot column.
I have updated the original post with the latest improvements.
Thinking a bit about it, I found a way. Now I will color the numbers in the two single slot current columns red, if the charger need a pair to charge.
I have updated the table.
Any comments about this?
No comment. Keep it as it is (now).
Thank you!
Pretty much whatever you decide works for me HKJ. This will be a very good and valuable reference. Thank you. 
I cannot promise that 100%, other good ideas may show up.
I am also wondering about how many different indexes to generate (The only work for me is the initial configuration, after that it will be automatic):
All charges
NiMH only chargers
Universal chargers (NiMH+LiIon)
LiIon chargers (Any charger with support for LiIon)
Analyzers (All chemistries)
Good chargers
Bad chargers
Chargers with power bank function
USB powered chargers
Chargers support >70mm long cells.
It can easily be too many, I will have to limit it.
Great reference, thank you HKJ! Sticky’d.
Thanks HKJ. Great list.
That works for me, thanks for making it easier to tell which ones need that.
Might be nice if it was possible to sort by clicking on the the desired column, like slots, current, charger name etc. It’s always frustrating to have to through the entire table to find a specific charger. Most of the time if it’s not possible to sort I don’t even bother.
For me, I’d be happy with just the basics:
All charges
NiMH only chargers
Universal chargers (NiMH+LiIon)
LiIon chargers (Any charger with support for LiIon)
Analyzers (All chemistries)
For chargers that support >70mm long cells, maybe you could color the max cell length in green in the table? That would make it stand out a little more for people looking for that.
Suberb work, as always, HKJ!
I have added many more chargers and now the first post shows a page from my server.
It is also possible to select between different indexes.
I am still very open to comments:
Improvements to the index
More explanations
Errors in the index (There will be some).
Very nice indeed! :+1:
I have been tinkering a bit more with the index adding more data and more different indexes.
Two tables have an extra column now.
Wonderful!
Just gonna throw out some wishful thinking, having all this info with a search like paramtrek.com would be amazing!
I am not going to do that. With all the indexes I have made you will usual be able to get a fairly limited number of chargers to select from.