Why? The battery voltage under load should be about 3.8V, using a good battery, so this means about 3.8 V *4.7 A = 17.86 W input into driver, with the 90% efficiency of the H1A this means 0.9*17.86 W=16.074 W to the led, and cree lists 2654 lumen with the 18W max input, taking this into account, and 10% losses from reflector/lens, expected lumens are 2654 lm/18 W*16.074 W*0.9 = 2133.02 lm, so above the 2000 lm at startup.
(Correct me if my math is wrong)
The led gives 2200 lumen at 18w
And your math said the led recieve 16W, so i guess the lumen is about 2000-2100 lumen
With 10% loss of glass and reflector, maybe the number is nearly below 2000 lumen
Still impressive
Thanks for your kind words and nice comments explaining some great things . I was away from home for a few days , so now i got the time to read the comments and update the review
Beamshots coming in a few minutes , and conclusion maybe too .
Great review. Got one of these myself and am pleasantly impressed. Feels like a comfortable 2000 lumens to the naked eye compared to convoy c8 and L6, and slots nicely in between in terms of performance.
Reckon you can convince kaidomain to put a xhp35 hi into the same set up? Even keeping the current around the 4A level? I’d buy that. Don’t have enough time or skills for even simple mods myself.
It is a common thing in many lights when going from highest to lowest level, it is hardware-related but can be suppressed by the software. (I’m not an expert).
Out of interest, with the H1A driver that is being used, is there an MCU on-board? I've looked at the photos, and everything seems to be obscured by a huge (I assume) inductor?
Honestly, this light has killed xpl based c8s for me. They just don’t compete. Yes, they throw a bit further, but you can SEE so much more with this out to 200m.
I’d love to see more lights with the xhp50.2, maybe an updated A6? And bistro UI too.
I almost like it more than my Q8 (don’t tell Miller et. Al. Though!)