Thanks for the info. I am wondering the classification of D1, D1S and D7, correct me if I am wrong,
So D1 is a small sized balanced light, not as much throw as C8,
and D1S is going to have a bit more throw than D1,
and D7 is going to be a flood light like D4, but with 7 emitters.
Are there any plans on other Dx?
Added a little DC FIX to mine and the partial squareness is almost entirely gone and itās a tad bit floodier. My approximating shoebox doesnāt see any more light loss than whatever 1 of my ācalibratedā lumens is worth at 100% 7135. I also tried melting/burning it off with repeated turbo runs with no failures. Now I can hold off from buying more optics for the time being.
I picture the D7 being very reminiscent of the DQG Tiny. As my anticipation heightens Iām hiding my credit card.
Yes, D1 and D4 tubes are interchangable, meaning D1 can also use the 18350 tube to become a tiny thrower.
D1 around 40Kcd, 1*XP-L HI, ultra small body, slightly bigger than D4 as it can be seen above, true all arounder for size and throw
D4 around 120Kcd,1*XP-L HI, excellent throw, small body
Iād call D1 a pocket thrower. Less throwy than D8, but much smaller.
D1S is 110 kcd, so just a small thrower.
D7 has 7 emitters and 3 18650s, most likely very floody, though if they keep the styling (head significantly larger than body), it could be throwier than D4 (w.r.t. beam profile, not just intensity). I havenāt seen any pictures or written details, so this is a wild guess.
Iām not aware of any other Emisar lights in the pipeline. Iād love to see some zoomies. And 21700 battery tubesā¦
I asked the same question. It seems (did not look above :person_facepalming: ) there is definitely a D7 coming 3x18650. My question is more of a DQG Tiny 26650 III size (but a little bit longer to avoid the issues shortness causes) so maybe with support they will go for a D? like we keep asking about?
I epoxied a pretty thick and strong magnet to the outside of the tailcap. Not as clean looking as CRXās magnet inside the tailcap, but it works for me.