Pros:
- Small (-er than DQG Tiny II)
- Wide and uniform flood (wider & cleaner than UF-H2b!)
- Good mode arrangement (Lo-Hi, without memory)
- No PWM
- Magnet in tail is stronger than the one in DQG Tiny II
- Build quality seems good
- No battery rattle, even when off
- "Gentleman's DQG" (Stylish, no knurling, polished ends)
Cons:
- No knurling -> a bit slippery, but not so much than I thought it to be!
- Output feels a bit low (because there's NO hotspot)
- Not available as NW
- Turning on doesn't feel as easy as DQG Tiny II (a bit more stiff, maybe just because it's new?)
I'll add more pros/cons as soon as I notice them & might even write a full review later (if/when time)
Here's two pictures comparing to DQG Tiny II:
Sorry about the picture quality, didn't have time to use flash(es).. :(
I own the DQG Tiny II NW from the group buy back in the days. It isn't available anymore ... you have to wait for the III or III titan. Here you write a letter to this one man enterprise and tell him to hurry up and make it inexpensive. ;-)
Won't it be a totally green light at that lumen rate? My Quark's lows really are green. And my totally floody UF H3D is totally blue. I couldn't find a good flood light with good tint yet.
During daytime you might not notice it being on. Significantly less than DQG Tiny II.
It's also hard to say because of the floody beam pattern, but I would estimate it to less than 1 lumen (when compared to Thrunite Ti Firefly and 3lm versions).
I received my Preon P0 yesterday. I hadn’t expected that the Light is so floody. Very special. The magnet tail ist strong and I like the low ‘low’ mode. Imho the best I’ve seen so far.