2mm ZWB2 filter tested (visible light blocking filter suitable for 365nm UV flashlights)

He quoted $3.83/ea which is the same price he sells two of the non-coated filters for now. He says they need to be produced (manufactured) and will get back to me. Will keep you informed

Hereā€™s a graph showing one companyā€™s projected improvement

That would be cool, what would be phenomenal would be to get some 12mm & 10mm sizes made too.

^

And SRK/Maglite size. I want to make a UV multi-emitter.

Also, interested in the A/R coating aspect, but different sizes more.

Iā€™m interested in a couple at least. I have two Nichia NVSU233A-U365 1030mW chips on the way right now. My first uv emitters so Iā€™m trying not to get too excited. :smiley:

Anyone found a source for larger than 20.5mm diameter lenses? I want to build a multi-emmiter light or even maybe a 365nm C8, because, why not :stuck_out_tongue:

Looked on AX, only sheets for a few hunnert bux each.

I wanted some for a ā€™501 or ā€™502, ā€™though yeah, a C8 would be nice!

Yes,on aliexpress there is a mix of offers with random thickness and diameter, sometimes more offers, sometimes hardly any. Usually tens of dollars for anything more than 25mm.

Pardon a dumb question. I ordered a set (2pcs) of ZWB2 filters from Simonā€™s Convoy store in AliExpress and it just arrived a few days ago. Iā€™m wondering when I place the ZWB2 filter inside the Convoy S2+ UV Nichia flashlight, can I place it behind the existing plain glass lens (which is what I just did ā€” so it has a plain glass lens in front, and the ZWB2 filter just behind it), or do I need to remove the plain glass lens altogether (ie. only the ZWB2 filter)?

When shining some other light on the ZWB2 filter, it looks like it has concentric circles/rings, though I donā€™t notice the concentric rings when using the Convoy UV w/ ZWB2 flashlightā€¦

Donā€™t know about the circles but I always replaced the glass with the filter.

Yeah, when 2 pieces of glass get close enough that thereā€™s a very small air-gap, you get funky optical properties. Some places would be in contact, some places would have a clear air-gap, others would be in that twilight zone in-between where itā€™d essentially be a vacuum (ie, other than maybe H2, no molecules would be able to fit.

So what youā€™re seeing is a sort of standing-wave of the 2 distinctly different interfaces: glassā€“glass, glassā€“air, and glassā€“vacuum, and the different refractive funkiness of each zone.

Thatā€™s why I donā€™t even like to keep the original glass when refitting with a TIR. Weird things can happen.

ā€”

Oh, wait a secā€¦ you mean just the nekkid ZWB2 filter and no other glass on/under it? Hmm, never really noticed that. Will have to look. :smiley:

^ ah, now I see what rings were meant (they are called Newton rings, an interference effect between layers close to each other, close to parallel but not exact.)

Ah, good. I was hoping someoneā€™d remember what they were called. I was drawing a blank.

Learned something new today. Yes, Newton rings are indeed what Iā€™m seeing.

Thus by placing 2 pieces of glass (the non-AR-coated glass lens and the ZWB2 filter) close together, there is indeed an air-gap between them that causes these Newton ringsā€¦ I wonder which one is the slightly convex curved glass ā€” the plain glass lens or the ZWB2 filter ā€” more likely the ZWB2 filter?

Is the coated version still available somewhere?

I do not understand, the coated version of what do you mean? (ZWB2 filters as far as I know are not coated).

There was a coated version mentioned above but I donā€™t know if it was released.

Ah sorry, I see, I should have read some posts back, the discussion is from last year and apparently Iā€™m so senile already that I totally forgot.

I guess Simon never went on with it and pirate stopped bugging him about it. It is not in his store at least.

Ah thatā€™s sad. The coated version would have been an even better addition than the non coated filter I think.

Just reread this post - forgot to update -sorry. Upon further investigation I was told that AR coatings are not really efficient for UVA and result in a significant transmission loss, so I just dropped it (sadly donā€™t remember the details). Of course Iā€™m sure there are specialty houses which can create very efficient coatings, but at a very inefficient price (I was quote a couple hundred for one piece, and a setup charge as I remember).