[PART 1] Official BLF GT Group Buy thread. Group buy officially closed! Lights shipping.

Sorry, too late:

The warmer tint of the production model means that less light is diffracted in the air, and more of it hits the target. That’s why you get less of a lightsaber effect… Most people prefer neutral or warm white tints for throwers (when they actually want to see the things they’re pointing their light at).

It seems odd that this is your first post on BLF…?

As it has been explained many times, the more you see the beam the less light gets to the target - that’s what happens with CW tint. The T in GT is for thrower, not saber.

Unfortunately - the camera doesn’t lie… it is crystal clear from the video that the new model has a marked reduction in performance.

I know people have different preferences of tint… but in my experience of both users and the progression of recent years of flashlight development, yellow is inferior - by far.
I remember watching numerous comparison videos of stuff like the first XLH diodes etc… and the latest and best was always the ‘brightest and whitest’. It gives more clarity and is just, well, brighter.

Okay, gothcha. :+1:

I can make a video from an 1000 lumen flashlight seem brighter than a 3000 lumen light or with white balance adjusting tricking your eyes.

Your eyes doesn’t lie. You need to see it in person to judge.

Not sure what the ‘odd’ comment is implying…

I’m saying that as per the linked video… there’s a marked reduction in performance of the new model… if you read the associated thread comments on that video you will see others making the same observation…

Yeah… of course i’ll try it when it arrives… but c’mon… I mean just watch the linked vid from about 03:12 onwards……

…even the beam ray from the newer model is weaker… before you even look at what they’re pointed at…

I think the odd part is that your 4 posts on the forum is on these last two pages, so you couldn’t have purchased a GT?

Was he using PM to be added to the list?

No no… not odd at all… I’m on the list and have paid - the list which is now closed… only reason I’m posting now is that I just came across the video whist looking for any recent posts about the flashlight… and got worried… been a member since last year

??

Did you post your first post here asking to be added to the list?

That is Matt (Vestureofblood on this forum), he tested the prototype light which had “giggles” written on it and it also had a cooler temp led in it.

The fact is, the camera CAN lie. The real proof is measuring the output with a meter than is not influenced by color temperature. Both lights are putting out about 2,500 lumen. Both have the same throw measurements.

A neutral white led was desired earlier in the product development (like 4500k to 5000k), but there was not enough stock available once production was about to begin. So the decision was made to go a bit warmer to a 4000k color temp where we knew we could get all high bin, high quality leds in the quantity that was needed.

I just searched the paid list and didn’t see your name on it

I’ll PM you… confused…

Both of my GT’s tested at the emitter on Turbo were what they were supposed to be 2.50amps.

1.99 amps on High…

’A neutral white led was desired earlier in the product development (like 4500k to 5000k), but there was not enough stock available once production was about to begin.’

…really wish I’d known this prior to ordering… :frowning:

…something tells me I won’t be alone in this either…

Yup :slight_smile:

As difficult as this thread is to follow, this has been known for some time. You probably won’t be alone, and I was skeptical until I had my production unit in hand. But it is glorious. Don’t judge it until you try it.