+2
JasonWW:That reminds me. It is important that everybody have their Paypal account info up to date. Shipping address, your name, email and phone number is all pulled from there.
YES! This is SUPER important. Many of the issues from the last batch were caused be incorrect info and having to update order info after the order was placed. This time around there will be a $5 fee for any changes to the information after the order is placed. Also if there are any issues with the shipping or otherwise due to the information not being correct, all associated fees and charges will be the buyers responsibility (there were a few cases of the wrong address being used and the order was returned to lumintop, costing them more then the light just in the combined shipping costs). If the issue is lumintops fault they eat the cost themselves without an issue. I Should add this to the OP when I get some time.
all that was written on the ordering page and therefore accepted by the people who bought a GT
disclaimer:
- Neither Lumintop nor the GB team is in any way responsible for customs duty, taxes, brokerage fees, or any other additional fees. These are the buyer’s responsibility to calculate and pay.
- If the package is delivered with taxes, duties or other fees payable and/or the buyer refuses the package for any reason, a refund will not be given until the complete light has been returned to Lumintop. Note that shipping costs are non-refundable.
- You are responsible that the shipping address forwarded to us via the PayPal invoice is correct. If the light cannot be delivered we can try to resend, but additional costs that may result are on you.
a lot of the cases could have been handled very different by lumintop and the team
saving them a lot money and time
.. just saying ;)
but we should add “we have the right to refund your money and cancel your order at any time if problems occur during the shipping process caused by unforseen circumstances“
To keep this thread from dieing here a question that may also also interest others…
TA, did you do some beamshots with your BLF GT having the XHP70 installed?
I would really like to see this in comparison to the stock setup…
I had actually posted some a few months ago. Although I never got a beamshot with the dedomed emitter come to think of it.
Here is the xhp70.2 with dome on:
XHP35 prototype CW in the same location (I can’t seem to find my production beamshots right now):
XHP70.2 GT vs a 1000m thrower, the G36 IIRC:
119 patient days later my light is here. DHL delivered today. Based on everyone’s feedback I was expecting a monster light and it was even larger than expected. Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen.
Ya, it is huge. My family is surprised that I can get flashlight that is bigger than my other big flashlights.
You should hear what my family says about mine…
Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Not brightest but longest throwing LED reflector light I am aware of.
DENGOH:Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Not brightest but longest throwing LED reflector light I am aware of.
Ya. Is that why NASA ordering more?
I wonder NASA try to custom GT, can they share some pictures? :sunglasses:
Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Yeah, maybe more appropriately called a searchlight.
There are HID spotlights larger than the GT and my light though, idk if you would call those a flashlight.
For example the lemax LX70 or those big HID searchlights sold in stores which don’t get anywhere near the millions of candlepower they advertise.
Texas_Ace: DENGOH:Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Not brightest but longest throwing LED reflector light I am aware of.
Ya. Is that why NASA ordering more?
I wonder NASA try to custom GT, can they share some pictures? :sunglasses:
Yes, they wanted to try the best commercial product out to see what it can do. This is pretty common as it costs a whole lot less to research with an existing product even if it is not exactly what you need then it does to start from scratch.
Not sure they will send pictures but I can ask.
I do know that they really want the warmest tint they can get. 3000k is the coolest they want and keep asking if I can get anything warmer. For real world throw warmer tints are simply better.
DENGOH: Texas_Ace: DENGOH:Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Not brightest but longest throwing LED reflector light I am aware of.
Ya. Is that why NASA ordering more?
I wonder NASA try to custom GT, can they share some pictures? :sunglasses:Yes, they wanted to try the best commercial product out to see what it can do. This is pretty common as it costs a whole lot less to research with an existing product even if it is not exactly what you need then it does to start from scratch.
Not sure they will send pictures but I can ask.
I do know that they really want the warmest tint they can get. 3000k is the coolest they want and keep asking if I can get anything warmer. For real world throw warmer tints are simply better.
so i guess they simply wait public develops a new light and buy it instead of spending thousands buck in developing new light
Texas_Ace: DENGOH: Texas_Ace: DENGOH:Yours are custom right? GT is stock. GT might be among the world’s biggest stock flashlight at this moment.
Not brightest but longest throwing LED reflector light I am aware of.
Ya. Is that why NASA ordering more?
I wonder NASA try to custom GT, can they share some pictures? :sunglasses:Yes, they wanted to try the best commercial product out to see what it can do. This is pretty common as it costs a whole lot less to research with an existing product even if it is not exactly what you need then it does to start from scratch.
Not sure they will send pictures but I can ask.
I do know that they really want the warmest tint they can get. 3000k is the coolest they want and keep asking if I can get anything warmer. For real world throw warmer tints are simply better.
so i guess they simply wait public develops a new light and buy it instead of spending thousands buck in developing new light
Yep, something like that. This is pretty common in all sorts of research to use the best you can find and then test it before building your own.
I got my first one with batteries inside shipped to the Philippines.
After using my GT for two weeks, I think I would say its neutral 4000k tint is kind of “boring” in a good way.
It doesn’t have much light saber effect and very comfortable to use in dusty night. It makes my SST40 SR95S UT beam look harsh when use them side by side.
And when it shines on very distant object that is not completely dark, due to its tint is so neutral that blend well and not harsh, it is quite difficult to judge via eyesight whether its light actually reaches the distant object. I think that is why people think CW is better because CW will make the distant object looks illuminated easily due to its harshness.
Why I say it is “boring”, because it is a bit too comfortable or natural and less intimidating than CW light. I am thinking if I ever mod it with XHP70.2, I will put a 3000k led in it, hope that it will be more intimidating in comfortable way. I can’t see clearly beyond 500m anyway.
After using my GT for two weeks, I think I would say its neutral 4000k tint is kind of “boring” in a good way. It doesn’t have much light saber effect and very comfortable to use in dusty night. It makes my SST40 SR95S UT beam look harsh when use them side by side. And when it shines on very distant object that is not completely dark, due to its tint is so neutral that blend well and not harsh, it is quite difficult to judge via eyesight whether its light actually reaches the distant object. I think that is why people think CW is better because CW will make the distant object looks illuminated easily due to its harshness. Why I say it is “boring”, because it is a bit too comfortable or natural and less intimidating than CW light. I am thinking if I ever mod it with XHP70.2, I will put a 3000k led in it, hope that it will be more intimidating in comfortable way. I can’t see clearly beyond 500m anyway.
Is that a straight LED swap?
3000k XHP70.2 GT looks really good, a lot like a halogen searchlight but with a much nicer beam. It is not a whitewall queen but looks really nice outside and it really does seem to be visible further away.
DENGOH:After using my GT for two weeks, I think I would say its neutral 4000k tint is kind of “boring” in a good way. It doesn’t have much light saber effect and very comfortable to use in dusty night. It makes my SST40 SR95S UT beam look harsh when use them side by side. And when it shines on very distant object that is not completely dark, due to its tint is so neutral that blend well and not harsh, it is quite difficult to judge via eyesight whether its light actually reaches the distant object. I think that is why people think CW is better because CW will make the distant object looks illuminated easily due to its harshness. Why I say it is “boring”, because it is a bit too comfortable or natural and less intimidating than CW light. I am thinking if I ever mod it with XHP70.2, I will put a 3000k led in it, hope that it will be more intimidating in comfortable way. I can’t see clearly beyond 500m anyway.
Is that a straight LED swap?
The xhp70.2 requires a new MCPCB. Right now the only way to get them is to mod an existing mcpcb but I am trying to get lumintop to make them to sell. They made some prototypes but are still dodging my questions when I ask if they will sell them. I think they are worried about demand.
The stock driver can also be used with a resistor mod or I have a new driver I am prototyping that will allow max power with the xhp70.2.
AdrianWA: DENGOH:After using my GT for two weeks, I think I would say its neutral 4000k tint is kind of “boring” in a good way. It doesn’t have much light saber effect and very comfortable to use in dusty night. It makes my SST40 SR95S UT beam look harsh when use them side by side. And when it shines on very distant object that is not completely dark, due to its tint is so neutral that blend well and not harsh, it is quite difficult to judge via eyesight whether its light actually reaches the distant object. I think that is why people think CW is better because CW will make the distant object looks illuminated easily due to its harshness. Why I say it is “boring”, because it is a bit too comfortable or natural and less intimidating than CW light. I am thinking if I ever mod it with XHP70.2, I will put a 3000k led in it, hope that it will be more intimidating in comfortable way. I can’t see clearly beyond 500m anyway.
Is that a straight LED swap?
The xhp70.2 requires a new MCPCB. Right now the only way to get them is to mod an existing mcpcb but I am trying to get lumintop to make them to sell. They made some prototypes but are still dodging my questions when I ask if they will sell them. I think they are worried about demand. The stock driver can also be used with a resistor mod or I have a new driver I am prototyping that will allow max power with the xhp70.2.
If its a straight mcpcb swap I might do it myself. But if I have to add anything to the existing one I might pass on that
It is possible they might offer the mcpcb with LED already installed. Although I first have to convince them to sell them at all lol