any interest in 2*AA flashlight?

I don’t see the point in 2x14500. Anyone wanting to use lithium-ion, would be better off just going for a 18650 light. But 2xAA is a nice form factor for general use. Decent run-time compared to 1xAA, but still small enough to carry in a jacket pocket.

I like my T01 (1xAA), but I tend not to use my 2xAA’s much anymore. Probably it’s because a 1x18650 is a better alternative, for those that don’t mind lithium-ion cells. But for those that want to stick to AA’s, I think a T02 would be a great fit.

Interested in 2xAA or 2xNiMH with decent performance, for non flashaolics.

Forget 2x14500. They are expensive compared to their capacity.

A short tube for just one AA would be a nice option.
USB charging for NiMH would be great.

Please manker…. make a good 2xaa with ability to recharge 2x NIMH via micro usb or usb type c…

But not having to unscrew the head to acces the usb port. I mean…. preferably usb port with a rubber cap to avoid water/moisture.

And forget 14500.

please please!

800 lm??? Please, stop this stupid hunting for hundrets of lumens! I´d prefer 350-400 lm without step down and with good runtime(more than hour of 400 flat regulated lumens would be fantastic).

There are already plenty of 2xAA out there that does that already. High powered 2xAA is limited to only Armytek Prime and Partner A2.

Yes, the Armytek Prime A2 will already do what he wants.

I agree with samyy. 800 lumens seems over the board for a 2xAA light. How useful can it be if it drains the batteries in seconds and you’re left with a dead light or very little runtime after that? My interest in this kind of light is for friends and family who have no clue about Li-ion cells. They are usually plenty happy with a few hundred lumens.

Forgot the model name, but I had exactly that light in mind. Thnx! @Manker, I would buy something like this immediately.

But, it was literally just said in the posts above yours (the ones you quoted) - that the light you want already exists! We don’t need another light like the others. So, if Manker will make it 800lm, it will be worth making and lots of us will buy it. Besides, have you never heard of modes?

Seconds??? 800 lumens with two Eneloop Pro AA’s should be able to maintain that for at least half an hour. Heat will probably require thermal regulation, but in cold weather that wouldn’t need to kick in at all.

Besides, if you want 500 lumens, get an Armytek Prime A2. It will run for an hour on that, or use lower modes if you want it to run all night.

If you only want to use alkalines, then you’re right to give up on any high-power light. Stick to a maglite or any department store light. (You won’t get regulated output, though.) Or, use the Armytek in lower modes, and alkalines will work fine.

Guys…

I think that something with a crazy turbo mode of 800 lumens, high of 500 lumens, medium of 300 lumens, low of 80 lumens, ultralow of 15, and firefly of less than 1 lumen is a perfect choice.

That would be decent runtimes depending the mode you choose.

If you need huge output you put turbo…. the you need less output you put lower .ode and so on.

If good to have the chance to have 800 lumens for a burst.

Seems reasonable….

I would be interested if:
-the AA batteries were placed size by side, and not 1 behind the other like majority of lights This would keep the light compact in length.
-the output and general performance was designed mostly around NiMH batteries. I agree with others, if using 2 x 14500, may as well go with a 18650 light.

Not to be Mr Glass Half-Empty, but I’m not sure just how practical a 2×AA light would be.

You’re losing the compactness of a 1×AA light, so it wouldn’t be nearly as pocketable.

You’re having 2 cells in series, which is dangerous for Li-ion cells (matched 14500s?), and using alkaleaks, you know one is going to drain faster’n the other and start leaking all over the place, turning the insides into a salt-mine.

With 2×AA, I’d rather use an 18650 light already, which would be shorter, yet have much greater output and runtime. Or just a 1×AA light with a 14500.

I got a few TK4As and SF11s which are 4×AA lights, tomato-paste-can lights. I already had an alkaleak brown one of the nice shiny brass nipples in the tailcap when it started leaking. Now, as soon as I see any drop in performance, I empty the light and use the individual (non-leaking) cells in 1×AA lights, watching them carefully. It’s a pain.

2×NiMH might be problematic, also unless you watch each cell. Low-voltage indication would get tricky, twin half-spent alkaleaks on turbo might drop to the 1.xV range, enough for at least one NiMH cell to run down well below 1V.

I’ve got two Quark 2AA-X lights that I stopped using because even though I love the twist-for-turbo head, “maximum” would steadily drop as the cells wore down. Can’t use a pair of 14500s with the low-voltage head, so I went and got the 1×AA tube for it. Still is a waste, as it still fades with cell-wear, and I still don’t use it anymore, now that so many other 1×AA lights (SP10/TK05/etc.) outperform it. It’s not very pocketable, and is a waste to holster.

I just don’t see any advantage to a 2×AA light over, well, anything.

And besides, 2wks after Manker comes out with it, there’ll be a UTorch UT2AA coming out. :smiling_imp:

There is nothing stopping Manker from making a flashlight that has both 800 lm turbo mode as well as 400 lm high mode. Don’t turn on the turbo mode if you don’t want to.

We will show the design soon

Could be interesting. I have several Manker lights, including the Bluetooth-controlled GodMess, and other Manker AAA & AA lights. The Manker E03H is currently my favorite single AA 1.5 volt light i ever owned, and use it more than any other EDC light i have.

I like 2xAA for chucking in a glove box or fishing tackle box etc. Especially with some Eneloops in it. But some 14500s could be interesting for more day to day use.

Then…. it is going to have usb recharge??

If not, I am not interested

I’m not sure why the demand for built-in charging. Yes, it’s convenient, but often comes with the cost of losing waterproofing. It also adds to the size and weight of the light. Also, there’s the complexity of charging two cells which are in series. Will the circuitry charge them independently, or will it just charge them as a single battery? If it’s just treated as a single battery, that could result in premature wearing of the cells.

I can see why people would like USB charging, but are they also willing to accept the downsides?

I like to have a couple of lights that have built-in charging. It makes is easy for travel. But I wouldn’t want it on most of my lights.

Personally I don’t see the advantage of a flashlight being able to recharge the battery. I have several that can but I find it easier, and of course quicker, to just pop in another battery when I have too. If I have time to wait for the built-in charger to recharge the battery then I have time to put the battery in a dedicated charger that will likely do a better and faster job. I guess if I only had a single battery for the flashlight then it would be handy to have, but how many people only have a single battery for their flashlight? And especially for a AA light?